| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 12:17 - Jan 9 with 1543 views | judd |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 12:09 - Jan 9 by Brierls |
Mr Dunphy has said its Beech's job to lose. The bit about Beech being appointed until the end of the season seems to have stemmed from a 'Sky Sports understands..' story, there has been nothing official as far as I'm aware. |
Alternatively, is their a split in our Boardroom? |  |
|  |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 12:36 - Jan 9 with 1463 views | Brierls |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 12:17 - Jan 9 by judd |
Alternatively, is their a split in our Boardroom? |
Quite possibly. There was over the appointment of Eyre (allegedly). |  | | |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 12:59 - Jan 9 with 1396 views | frenzied |
lets give chris beech a chance to the end of the season,,Flitcroft is better off where he is....altho i dont expect Barnsley to get into play offs this season ,dont write them off for next season |  | | |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 09:36 - Jan 11 with 827 views | SuddenLad |
Seems as though Flicker is annoyed at the very suggestion of being linked with the job.
It couldn't be clearer:
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11765/7422303/
|  |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:08 - Jan 11 with 787 views | 100notout |
can't see any annoyance in that statement | |
| |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:09 - Jan 11 with 784 views | AtThePeake |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:08 - Jan 11 by 100notout |
can't see any annoyance in that statement |
I think the headline is a strange one, as it does make it sound as is Flicker is angry.
The statement itself actually sounds like he could be interested if Barnsley were going to be happy to let him go but obviously they won't be. |  |
| |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:19 - Jan 11 with 770 views | 442Dale |
It's the same quotes appearing in two separate Sky articles. Check the previous post's link.
Bloody lazy journalists. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:22 - Jan 11 with 763 views | SuddenLad |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:08 - Jan 11 by 100notout |
can't see any annoyance in that statement |
'Flitcroft Slams Dale Berth'
The word 'slams' suggests a hint of pique. | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:28 - Jan 11 with 752 views | 100notout |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:22 - Jan 11 by SuddenLad |
'Flitcroft Slams Dale Berth'
The word 'slams' suggests a hint of pique. |
If you read what he is quoted as saying there is no annoyance. In fact as ATP says "the statement itself actually sounds like he could be interested if Barnsley were going to be happy to let him go but obviously they won't be".
Typical journalism -using a (probably inaccurate) headline to make something out of nothing | |
| |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 15:30 - Jan 11 with 710 views | KenBoon |
Sky Sports are the drizzling shits.
And am I the only person who thinks Dave Flitcroft/Barnsley going public with this story is a bit low? |  | | |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 15:51 - Jan 11 with 682 views | fitzochris |
| Dale have their eye on Flitcroft on 10:28 - Jan 11 by 100notout |
If you read what he is quoted as saying there is no annoyance. In fact as ATP says "the statement itself actually sounds like he could be interested if Barnsley were going to be happy to let him go but obviously they won't be".
Typical journalism -using a (probably inaccurate) headline to make something out of nothing |
If the headline is at fault, then the sub/web editor is to blame, not the journalist. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
