By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Dóllar is on the verge of collapse, things look bleak for the US. Every country that General Wesley in 2007 said they would attack is being attacked, going back to 2001. They are all countries that do not want to sell oil under the Dollar or support this.
Iran will be next, if they don't join forces with Syria already. The end game will be a world War. A War not on the ground but in the air and guerrilla like, that will have an impact on us the likes of which this generation has never seen. Iraq now support Irán , so that one really worked.
The US will want a new world order and currency. It seems that is there plan for survival.
Not scare mongering but things do not look good.
[Post edited 4 Sep 2013 18:19]
Where there is hoop there's the hoops.
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 18:23 - Sep 7 with 5286 views
I thought arabs were Semitic.Oh well,whatever and whoever,'tis to war they'll be a goin' as sure as vindaloo gives you diarhoea. And there ain't nothing you can do about it little man.
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 18:23 - Sep 7 by TheBlob
I thought arabs were Semitic.Oh well,whatever and whoever,'tis to war they'll be a goin' as sure as vindaloo gives you diarhoea. And there ain't nothing you can do about it little man.
[Post edited 7 Sep 2013 18:24]
You're right again Blob,there's over 300 million Arab semites around the world plus millions more from other tribes and races including my late mother who was Akkadian Assyrian the 1st ever semite language used. And i'm an anti semite
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 18:45 - Sep 7 with 5260 views
We cannot afford another war, our infrastructure is creaking at the seams.
So and I hate to say this standing back, whether he did/didn't use chemical weapons is immaterial. The money that any strike would cost should be spent here.
How many old people who fought for this country will die this winter because they cant afford to heat and eat?
Beer and Beef has made us what we are - The Prince Regent
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 19:22 - Sep 7 with 5234 views
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 15:21 - Sep 7 by 1BobbyHazell
"most trustworthy sources on earth"!!!!!!!!
What the same trustworthy sources who lied about WMD's so that they could invade a country and commit mass genocide?
Or the same trustworthy sources that supported Saddam during his use of chemical weapons?
Or the same trustworthy sources that are funding and arming the al-queda linked rebels who have been using chemical weapons against the Syrian populace themselves?
I share your anger and dismay at the crossing of "every boundary of decency and humanity". But I believe we have a big responsibilty to know and acknowledge when it is done by 'us' if we are going to be a part of positive change and genuine peace.
A very informative video which you could use that as a template for any other Middle Eastern war that the Illuminati funded America pursue. Typical that they'll back any evil regime whilst it suits them then turn against them when it doesn't. Evil bastards Here's more
[Post edited 7 Sep 2013 19:32]
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 19:32 - Sep 7 with 5219 views
So can you just remind me exactly which conspiracy is being espoused now, by whom and for what purpose. Are we saying it is the illuminati, Obama and the US military complex, the Rothschilds, the zionist, semites, anti semites, Iranians, Hezbollah, the pope, Al Queda, the Chinese, the Russians, Bilderberg, the royal family or David Icke.
Personally I am still going with the Lizards as being by far and away the most credible option. Makes about as much sense as anything so far.
Never knowingly understood
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 19:34 - Sep 7 with 5218 views
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 19:32 - Sep 7 by danehoop
So can you just remind me exactly which conspiracy is being espoused now, by whom and for what purpose. Are we saying it is the illuminati, Obama and the US military complex, the Rothschilds, the zionist, semites, anti semites, Iranians, Hezbollah, the pope, Al Queda, the Chinese, the Russians, Bilderberg, the royal family or David Icke.
Personally I am still going with the Lizards as being by far and away the most credible option. Makes about as much sense as anything so far.
If you have nothing of interest to say,then shut up you're boring
[Post edited 7 Sep 2013 19:52]
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 20:12 - Sep 7 with 5184 views
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 17:45 - Sep 5 by Orthodox_Hoop
Who is 'they'? If you mean do I think the rebels orchestrated the gas attack against the civilian population in order to get an international response, then yes I think 'they' did it.
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 15:57 - Sep 7 by LythamR
"Being anti-zionist is exactly the same as being anti-semetic. There is no difference. The logic of anti-Zionism is that the Jews are the only nation on earth that are not allowed to have pride in their national identity. It is absurd and clearly beyond the pale of regular society."
What about the Palestinians, they also are not allowed to have pride in their national identity.
The jewish people are not aggresively militant on the whole, The majority of Zionists are, therefore it is quote possible to be anti Zionist without being anti semetic
No. It is not possible to be anti-zionist without being anti-Semitic. They are the same thing.
It is possible to oppose the policies of Israel's government. Lots of people, Jews and non-Jews alike, oppose the policies of the Israeli government. But being anti-zioninst (opposed to Jews having a national identity) is the same as being anti-Jewish -- which we call anti-Semitism.
Of course the Palestinians are allowed to have pride in their national identity. Who ever said they weren't?
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 07:31 - Sep 8 by DylanP
No. It is not possible to be anti-zionist without being anti-Semitic. They are the same thing.
It is possible to oppose the policies of Israel's government. Lots of people, Jews and non-Jews alike, oppose the policies of the Israeli government. But being anti-zioninst (opposed to Jews having a national identity) is the same as being anti-Jewish -- which we call anti-Semitism.
Of course the Palestinians are allowed to have pride in their national identity. Who ever said they weren't?
"But being anti-zioninst (opposed to Jews having a national identity) is the same as being anti-Jewish -- which we call anti-Semitism."
Then explain to me the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network.
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 15:41 - Sep 7 by MrSheen
I described the reports of Ethiopian immigrants being coerced into taking shots of Depo-Provera, a contraceptive that lasts three months, as a "massive, shameful embarrassment" to Israel, and said I was pleased that it had stopped. I linked to two different views of what had happened.
I also linked to a Wikipedia page on forced sterilisation (not long-lasting contraception), which included a comment that Uzbekistan has a policy of forcibly sterilising mothers with more than two children.
Apologies for the slight mis quote however, i've had a look this morning and on the thread in question your 1st response was not to condemn Israel but try and divert attention to Uzbekistan,Russia and China. It seems to me when ever there is damning information against Israel you go out of your way to make excuses for them.
Your 2nd response was....."This wasn't sterilisation (Depo-Provera shots last three months), but obviously a massive, shameful embarrassment to Israel. However, it was exposed by the press and media there, and stopped, which wouldn't have happened in other countries where similar practices have operated. Ethiopian immigrants have had it worse in other countries in the region."..
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 07:50 - Sep 8 by hoopstilidie
"But being anti-zioninst (opposed to Jews having a national identity) is the same as being anti-Jewish -- which we call anti-Semitism."
Then explain to me the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network.
There are people from every nation that reject their own cultural identity. I know plenty of English people who are anti-patriotic. Jews are no different. Why would they be?
Zion is a mountain. One of the seven mountains that make up Jerusalem. In biblical times, when they talked about the Jewish state established by King David with its capital in Jerusalem, they often called it Zion. In 19th century Europe, national movements were coalescing into political movements. Jewish nationalist decided to call their political movement zionism. Zionism is the name of the jewish national movement. End of. You can't be anti-Zionist, without being anti-Jewish. It is not possible. Because zionism is simply the name of the Jewish national movement.
Anyone can oppose the policies of the State of Israel. Of course there is nothing anti-Semitic about that. The state of Israel is run by politicians. But being anti-zionism means you opposed to the Jews having a national movement. Anti-zionism is anti-semitism. There is no difference.
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 08:50 - Sep 8 by DylanP
There are people from every nation that reject their own cultural identity. I know plenty of English people who are anti-patriotic. Jews are no different. Why would they be?
Zion is a mountain. One of the seven mountains that make up Jerusalem. In biblical times, when they talked about the Jewish state established by King David with its capital in Jerusalem, they often called it Zion. In 19th century Europe, national movements were coalescing into political movements. Jewish nationalist decided to call their political movement zionism. Zionism is the name of the jewish national movement. End of. You can't be anti-Zionist, without being anti-Jewish. It is not possible. Because zionism is simply the name of the Jewish national movement.
Anyone can oppose the policies of the State of Israel. Of course there is nothing anti-Semitic about that. The state of Israel is run by politicians. But being anti-zionism means you opposed to the Jews having a national movement. Anti-zionism is anti-semitism. There is no difference.
[Post edited 8 Sep 2013 9:32]
I repeat, explain to me the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network.
You are confusing political Zionism with Cultural Zionism. Not remotely the same animal.
The US says it will not put boots on the ground. Good. It's not their civil war. Nor is it Russia's. Or Iran's (who have boots on the ground). Or Hezbollah's (who have boots on the ground). Or Al Quaeda's (who have boots on the ground). That's the first problem... Too many boots that shouldn't be there.
I understand the UK is already helping many displaced persons. What more can the international community - especially the Arab League - do to help protect ordinary citizens in Syria and trying to get out of Syria?
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 09:57 - Sep 8 with 4980 views
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 09:51 - Sep 8 by CanadaRanger
Getting back to Syria...
The US says it will not put boots on the ground. Good. It's not their civil war. Nor is it Russia's. Or Iran's (who have boots on the ground). Or Hezbollah's (who have boots on the ground). Or Al Quaeda's (who have boots on the ground). That's the first problem... Too many boots that shouldn't be there.
I understand the UK is already helping many displaced persons. What more can the international community - especially the Arab League - do to help protect ordinary citizens in Syria and trying to get out of Syria?
Somebody's going to seize the stocks of Sarin when the Yanks have stamped the place flat.Boots on the ground imperative.
"And while Canada is not in a position to offer its own military assets for use in Syria, Harper did provide an additional $45 million for groups helping Syrian refugees. With that new contribution, Canada will have provided $203 million in aid since the beginning of 2012."
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 10:14 - Sep 8 with 5010 views
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 09:57 - Sep 8 by TheBlob
Somebody's going to seize the stocks of Sarin when the Yanks have stamped the place flat.Boots on the ground imperative.
All the more reason for the Americans not to get involved. Unless it is to destroy the chemical weapons stocks without endangering non-combatants - which apparently is darn near impossible to do. Mind you, there wouldn't be much left after a couple of those behemoth bunker busters were to hit a facility.
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 10:53 - Sep 8 with 4971 views
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 10:14 - Sep 8 by CanadaRanger
All the more reason for the Americans not to get involved. Unless it is to destroy the chemical weapons stocks without endangering non-combatants - which apparently is darn near impossible to do. Mind you, there wouldn't be much left after a couple of those behemoth bunker busters were to hit a facility.
Why will their be no american boots on the ground, if this syrian regime and its treatment of its civilians is so abhorrent to the USA why will they not commit to boots on the ground, rather than using this situation as another opportunity to test and experiment their expensive toys
0
US deciding on going to War with Syria on 11:12 - Sep 8 with 4959 views
This whole religion thing is a joke.My mate Scottyis part Jewish,she tells me her grandmother was hurled into a mental home by her family for marrying a Cornish fisherman.And they have the nerve to celebrate Yum Kipper. It's all a bit rich.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
is part Jewish,she tells me her grandmother was hurled into a mental home by her family for marrying a Cornish fisherman.And they have the nerve to celebrate Yum Kipper.