| Dunne off? on 15:11 - Feb 4 with 2894 views | Benny_the_Ball |
| Dunne off? on 08:31 - Feb 4 by PlanetHonneywood |
Ultimately, these are 29 pages of our LFW lives that we'll never get back. |
Rumour has it that the length of contract to be offered will be correlated to the number of pages this thread reaches.
EDIT: Ooops, that's taken it to 30! [Post edited 4 Feb 15:24]
|  | |  |
| Dunne off? on 16:25 - Feb 4 with 2687 views | numptydumpty |
| Dunne off? on 06:26 - Feb 4 by Wilkinswatercarrier |
Just woken up. Did we do 28 pages on something that didn't happen ? 🤣
Personally I think we should have sold, but he's a Ranger until the end of the season so hopefully he doesn't get grief. Pretty sure he won't in the ground, social media on the other hand.......
My personal favourite was someone tweeting that he should fck off to Sheffield and they hope he does his ACL in his first game.
The mentality of some people. |
Wasn't yourself that said that Wilkins, was it ???
You said we should move on Field, Smyth, Cook and Dunne.
All bang average, I remember you saying !!!
That would have gone down well...
Replacing them with Madsens and Celars available...... [Post edited 4 Feb 16:27]
|  |
| |
| Dunne off? on 16:32 - Feb 4 with 2628 views | Juzzie |
| Dunne off? on 15:09 - Feb 4 by W7Ranger |
What's a bigger risk?
27 year old Dunne on a 4 year contract?
Or
24 year old CB from a champ/league 1 club (that we might have to buy?) on a 3 year contract? [Post edited 4 Feb 16:20]
|
They're both a risk. All signings are a risk. See 'Richard Ord'. |  | | |
| Dunne off? on 16:49 - Feb 4 with 2535 views | W7Ranger |
| Dunne off? on 16:32 - Feb 4 by Juzzie |
They're both a risk. All signings are a risk. See 'Richard Ord'. |
Then we'll never sign anyone if you're worried about "what if's" all the time. |  | | |
| Dunne off? on 17:02 - Feb 4 with 2450 views | Dorse |
I declare this thread over and Dunne.
I'm here all week. |  |
| 'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!' |
| |
| Dunne off? on 17:25 - Feb 4 with 2330 views | dmm |
Someone suggested doing a AI summary of this thread. Anyone willing to oblige? It would be interesting to see one. |  | | |
| Dunne off? on 17:33 - Feb 4 with 2285 views | Juzzie |
| Dunne off? on 16:49 - Feb 4 by W7Ranger |
Then we'll never sign anyone if you're worried about "what if's" all the time. |
That's kind of my point and I'm not the one who's worried.
I think the point is that people should be a bit more understanding/trusting about the signings that are made and not dissect them to atomic level.
Speculation is OK but it's just that. In reality we simply do not know. Don't bother quoting click-bait websites as a source, they're just speculative too. | | | |
| Dunne off? on 18:00 - Feb 4 with 2165 views | eastside_r |
Well I for one am thrilled to pieces that Jimmy is staying, even if he walks for free in the summer. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Dunne off? on 19:07 - Feb 4 with 1931 views | BrianWilson |
| Dunne off? on 17:25 - Feb 4 by dmm |
Someone suggested doing a AI summary of this thread. Anyone willing to oblige? It would be interesting to see one. |
The forum thread titled "Dunne off?" on the Loft For Words website discusses the potential departure of QPR defender Jimmy Dunne amid interest from Sheffield United. Participants express a range of opinions on the matter.
Some members believe that if Dunne is unwilling to sign a new contract, the club should consider selling him to secure a transfer fee, rather than risk losing him for free when his contract expires. This perspective emphasizes the importance of prudent financial management for the club.
Others argue that Dunne's commitment and passion for QPR make him an invaluable asset, suggesting that the club should make every effort to retain him, even if it means offering a more substantial contract. They highlight his significant contributions on the field and his positive influence in the dressing room.
There is also skepticism about the reliability of transfer rumors, with some forum members suggesting that reports linking Dunne to other clubs may be speculative or tactics to expedite contract negotiations.
Additionally, the thread touches upon the challenges of replacing key players, referencing past instances where the club struggled to find suitable replacements after selling important squad members.
Overall, the discussion reflects a balance between the desire to retain a dedicated player and the need for strategic financial decisions to ensure the club's long-term stability. [Post edited 4 Feb 19:10]
|  |
| "a diseased bunch of mofos if there ever was one, their beauty is so awesome that listening to them at their best is like being in some vast dream cathedral decorated with a thousand gleaming American pop culture icons."
- Lester Bangs on The Beach Boys |
| |
| Dunne off? on 20:42 - Feb 4 with 1772 views | BristolR |
| Dunne off? on 19:07 - Feb 4 by BrianWilson |
The forum thread titled "Dunne off?" on the Loft For Words website discusses the potential departure of QPR defender Jimmy Dunne amid interest from Sheffield United. Participants express a range of opinions on the matter.
Some members believe that if Dunne is unwilling to sign a new contract, the club should consider selling him to secure a transfer fee, rather than risk losing him for free when his contract expires. This perspective emphasizes the importance of prudent financial management for the club.
Others argue that Dunne's commitment and passion for QPR make him an invaluable asset, suggesting that the club should make every effort to retain him, even if it means offering a more substantial contract. They highlight his significant contributions on the field and his positive influence in the dressing room.
There is also skepticism about the reliability of transfer rumors, with some forum members suggesting that reports linking Dunne to other clubs may be speculative or tactics to expedite contract negotiations.
Additionally, the thread touches upon the challenges of replacing key players, referencing past instances where the club struggled to find suitable replacements after selling important squad members.
Overall, the discussion reflects a balance between the desire to retain a dedicated player and the need for strategic financial decisions to ensure the club's long-term stability. [Post edited 4 Feb 19:10]
|
I’ve just used BristolAiEIEIO GPT
“Yeh but no but yeh but no but yeh”
Apparently |  | | |
| Dunne off? on 20:47 - Feb 4 with 1760 views | Myke |
| Dunne off? on 18:00 - Feb 4 by eastside_r |
Well I for one am thrilled to pieces that Jimmy is staying, even if he walks for free in the summer. |
This is in no way personally aimed at you Eastside R and I know you are in no way alone on this. But it is this short term vision that has us - and will keep us - a mid-table (at best) Championship club for the foreseeable future. It can never be about the player, it has to be about the club, if we are serious about moving forward. I have some faith in our CEO that he won't allow Jimmy to leave for free and a new contract will be announced in due course. I hope so, or this is a very bad deal for the club. |  | | |
| Dunne off? on 22:40 - Feb 4 with 1562 views | eastside_r |
| Dunne off? on 20:47 - Feb 4 by Myke |
This is in no way personally aimed at you Eastside R and I know you are in no way alone on this. But it is this short term vision that has us - and will keep us - a mid-table (at best) Championship club for the foreseeable future. It can never be about the player, it has to be about the club, if we are serious about moving forward. I have some faith in our CEO that he won't allow Jimmy to leave for free and a new contract will be announced in due course. I hope so, or this is a very bad deal for the club. |
Well Myke, I am going to have to respectfully disagree and I think you are somewhat misrepresenting me.
I will reiterate the point I made to you earlier in the thread. Jimmy Dunne has agency in this. You keep saying the club should be doing this or not doing that but this matters not a jot in this circumstance.
What contract Jimmy Dunne signs and with whom will be decided by one person, Jimmy himself. | | | |
| Dunne off? on 22:43 - Feb 4 with 1533 views | GaryHaddock |
Tonight he played like a dude about to sign a contract (or already has) to me. |  | | |
| Dunne off? on 00:55 - Feb 5 with 1385 views | Superhoops2808 |
| Dunne off? on 22:43 - Feb 4 by GaryHaddock |
Tonight he played like a dude about to sign a contract (or already has) to me. |
Agreed, you would not stand there and take the applause and fans cheering his name if you were offski in the summer |  | | |
| Dunne off? on 07:01 - Feb 5 with 1184 views | Rsole |
Sure, here’s a review of the discussions regarding Jimmy Dunne’s departure from QPR during the January 2025 transfer window, now that the situation has been concluded:
### Review of the Forum Discussions:
When the speculation around Jimmy Dunne’s potential departure first started, fans on **LoftforWords** were deeply divided on the matter. Over the course of the window, opinions evolved as more information became available, but several themes consistently emerged.
1. **Financial Considerations**: From the outset, many fans acknowledged QPR’s precarious financial situation, which led to speculation that they might be forced to sell key players. In Dunne’s case, his expiring contract made him a prime candidate for a January transfer.
- **Fan quote**: *“We all know the club's financial mess. If we don’t sell Dunne now, we might get nothing for him in the summer. It's painful but probably necessary.”*
- **Fan quote**: *“We need the cash more than we need the player right now, unfortunately. It’s hard to admit but we’re in no position to be sentimental.”*
2. **Emotional Attachment to Dunne**: Despite the financial realities, many fans expressed reluctance to see Dunne leave. His leadership and consistency in defense made him a fan favorite, and his departure was viewed by many as a massive blow to the team’s stability.
- **Fan quote**: *“Dunne’s been our rock at the back this season. I don’t care what the finances say, we can’t afford to lose him now. It’ll destroy our defense.”*
- **Fan quote**: *“If Dunne leaves, we’ll have to rely on untested youth or some panic buy. I’m genuinely worried about the impact on our survival chances.”*
3. **Speculation on Potential Moves**: As rumors of interest from higher-tier clubs began circulating, especially from Premier League teams and clubs pushing for promotion, fans speculated that Dunne could be a target for teams looking to shore up their defense. Some feared QPR would be unable to hold onto him, especially if a Premier League side came in with an offer.
- **Fan quote**: *“There’s talk of Villa and Wolves sniffing around him. If one of those comes in with a decent offer, I can’t see us turning it down.”*
- **Fan quote**: *“If we don’t sell him now, another club will come in, and we’ll get peanuts for him in the summer. It’s a tough call but that’s the reality.”*
4. **Optimism on Retaining Him**: A portion of the fanbase remained hopeful, arguing that if QPR could stay within touching distance of a playoff spot or escape relegation, they might be able to convince Dunne to stay. Some believed the club would prioritize keeping him for the second half of the season to strengthen their survival hopes or promotion ambitions.
- **Fan quote**: *“If we stay in the mix for promotion or even mid-table stability, maybe Dunne will stay. He’s always seemed committed to the cause, and he’s been a leader in the squad.”*
- **Fan quote**: *“I reckon he’ll stay. QPR needs him, and he knows he’s the main man here. Let’s just hope we can make him feel that we’ve got a future together.”*
---
### What Happened Next:
As the transfer window closed, it was confirmed that **Jimmy Dunne remained at QPR**. While there had been serious interest from multiple clubs, none were able to meet QPR’s valuation or come through with an offer that would sway the club’s decision to sell. The club’s management, understanding Dunne's importance to the team, decided to hold onto him and prioritize his contribution to the team's survival or promotion push for the remainder of the season.
This decision was met with relief by many supporters who had feared that a mid-season departure would destabilize the squad. However, the financial pressures on the club have not disappeared, and there remains speculation that QPR may be forced to reconsider selling key players in the summer.
---
### Speculation Going Forward:
Looking ahead, there are a few potential scenarios fans have been discussing:
1. **Summer Transfer in 2025**: Given his contract situation, many expect that Dunne could still leave at the end of the season for a reduced fee or even for free. If he continues to perform well, interest from Premier League clubs or promoted sides could intensify, and QPR may face a difficult decision about whether to cash in during the summer or risk losing him for nothing.
- **Fan speculation**: *“If he has another solid half-season, we’re likely to see more suitors in the summer. We’ll need to act fast to either secure him on a new contract or take the money now.”*
2. **Contract Extension Talks**: There’s also some speculation that QPR might attempt to tie Dunne down to a new deal if they can find a way to meet his wage demands, especially if the club’s financial outlook improves by the end of the season.
- **Fan speculation**: *“It’d be great if the club could find a way to extend his contract, but it feels unlikely unless there’s a drastic improvement in the financial situation.”*
3. **Team Performance Impact**: If QPR’s league position improves, Dunne’s importance to the team could become even more critical, making it harder for him to leave. However, if the club struggles to avoid relegation, financial pressures could force them to sell in the summer regardless.
In short, while Jimmy Dunne stayed at QPR in January 2025, his future beyond this season remains uncertain, with many fans hoping for a resolution that allows him to stay longer but acknowledging that financial realities could dictate otherwise. |  |
| Those possessed by devils, try and keep them under control a bit, can't you ?
|
| |
| Dunne off? on 07:07 - Feb 5 with 1156 views | Rsole |
| Dunne off? on 07:01 - Feb 5 by Rsole |
Sure, here’s a review of the discussions regarding Jimmy Dunne’s departure from QPR during the January 2025 transfer window, now that the situation has been concluded:
### Review of the Forum Discussions:
When the speculation around Jimmy Dunne’s potential departure first started, fans on **LoftforWords** were deeply divided on the matter. Over the course of the window, opinions evolved as more information became available, but several themes consistently emerged.
1. **Financial Considerations**: From the outset, many fans acknowledged QPR’s precarious financial situation, which led to speculation that they might be forced to sell key players. In Dunne’s case, his expiring contract made him a prime candidate for a January transfer.
- **Fan quote**: *“We all know the club's financial mess. If we don’t sell Dunne now, we might get nothing for him in the summer. It's painful but probably necessary.”*
- **Fan quote**: *“We need the cash more than we need the player right now, unfortunately. It’s hard to admit but we’re in no position to be sentimental.”*
2. **Emotional Attachment to Dunne**: Despite the financial realities, many fans expressed reluctance to see Dunne leave. His leadership and consistency in defense made him a fan favorite, and his departure was viewed by many as a massive blow to the team’s stability.
- **Fan quote**: *“Dunne’s been our rock at the back this season. I don’t care what the finances say, we can’t afford to lose him now. It’ll destroy our defense.”*
- **Fan quote**: *“If Dunne leaves, we’ll have to rely on untested youth or some panic buy. I’m genuinely worried about the impact on our survival chances.”*
3. **Speculation on Potential Moves**: As rumors of interest from higher-tier clubs began circulating, especially from Premier League teams and clubs pushing for promotion, fans speculated that Dunne could be a target for teams looking to shore up their defense. Some feared QPR would be unable to hold onto him, especially if a Premier League side came in with an offer.
- **Fan quote**: *“There’s talk of Villa and Wolves sniffing around him. If one of those comes in with a decent offer, I can’t see us turning it down.”*
- **Fan quote**: *“If we don’t sell him now, another club will come in, and we’ll get peanuts for him in the summer. It’s a tough call but that’s the reality.”*
4. **Optimism on Retaining Him**: A portion of the fanbase remained hopeful, arguing that if QPR could stay within touching distance of a playoff spot or escape relegation, they might be able to convince Dunne to stay. Some believed the club would prioritize keeping him for the second half of the season to strengthen their survival hopes or promotion ambitions.
- **Fan quote**: *“If we stay in the mix for promotion or even mid-table stability, maybe Dunne will stay. He’s always seemed committed to the cause, and he’s been a leader in the squad.”*
- **Fan quote**: *“I reckon he’ll stay. QPR needs him, and he knows he’s the main man here. Let’s just hope we can make him feel that we’ve got a future together.”*
---
### What Happened Next:
As the transfer window closed, it was confirmed that **Jimmy Dunne remained at QPR**. While there had been serious interest from multiple clubs, none were able to meet QPR’s valuation or come through with an offer that would sway the club’s decision to sell. The club’s management, understanding Dunne's importance to the team, decided to hold onto him and prioritize his contribution to the team's survival or promotion push for the remainder of the season.
This decision was met with relief by many supporters who had feared that a mid-season departure would destabilize the squad. However, the financial pressures on the club have not disappeared, and there remains speculation that QPR may be forced to reconsider selling key players in the summer.
---
### Speculation Going Forward:
Looking ahead, there are a few potential scenarios fans have been discussing:
1. **Summer Transfer in 2025**: Given his contract situation, many expect that Dunne could still leave at the end of the season for a reduced fee or even for free. If he continues to perform well, interest from Premier League clubs or promoted sides could intensify, and QPR may face a difficult decision about whether to cash in during the summer or risk losing him for nothing.
- **Fan speculation**: *“If he has another solid half-season, we’re likely to see more suitors in the summer. We’ll need to act fast to either secure him on a new contract or take the money now.”*
2. **Contract Extension Talks**: There’s also some speculation that QPR might attempt to tie Dunne down to a new deal if they can find a way to meet his wage demands, especially if the club’s financial outlook improves by the end of the season.
- **Fan speculation**: *“It’d be great if the club could find a way to extend his contract, but it feels unlikely unless there’s a drastic improvement in the financial situation.”*
3. **Team Performance Impact**: If QPR’s league position improves, Dunne’s importance to the team could become even more critical, making it harder for him to leave. However, if the club struggles to avoid relegation, financial pressures could force them to sell in the summer regardless.
In short, while Jimmy Dunne stayed at QPR in January 2025, his future beyond this season remains uncertain, with many fans hoping for a resolution that allows him to stay longer but acknowledging that financial realities could dictate otherwise. |
Clearly it’s hallucinating about relegation and financial concerns ! | |
| Those possessed by devils, try and keep them under control a bit, can't you ?
|
| |
| Dunne off? on 07:32 - Feb 5 with 1110 views | DannyPaddox |
| Dunne off? on 17:25 - Feb 4 by dmm |
Someone suggested doing a AI summary of this thread. Anyone willing to oblige? It would be interesting to see one. |
Dunne
Ullagone
No!
Not
Exiting
ps: why the desire to AI things at every turn? It’s effing depressing. |  | | |
| Dunne off? on 09:06 - Feb 5 with 966 views | loftboy |
| Dunne off? on 19:07 - Feb 4 by BrianWilson |
The forum thread titled "Dunne off?" on the Loft For Words website discusses the potential departure of QPR defender Jimmy Dunne amid interest from Sheffield United. Participants express a range of opinions on the matter.
Some members believe that if Dunne is unwilling to sign a new contract, the club should consider selling him to secure a transfer fee, rather than risk losing him for free when his contract expires. This perspective emphasizes the importance of prudent financial management for the club.
Others argue that Dunne's commitment and passion for QPR make him an invaluable asset, suggesting that the club should make every effort to retain him, even if it means offering a more substantial contract. They highlight his significant contributions on the field and his positive influence in the dressing room.
There is also skepticism about the reliability of transfer rumors, with some forum members suggesting that reports linking Dunne to other clubs may be speculative or tactics to expedite contract negotiations.
Additionally, the thread touches upon the challenges of replacing key players, referencing past instances where the club struggled to find suitable replacements after selling important squad members.
Overall, the discussion reflects a balance between the desire to retain a dedicated player and the need for strategic financial decisions to ensure the club's long-term stability. [Post edited 4 Feb 19:10]
|
30 pages summed up in one post , excellent work. |  |
| |
| Dunne off? on 12:33 - Feb 5 with 723 views | Myke |
| Dunne off? on 22:40 - Feb 4 by eastside_r |
Well Myke, I am going to have to respectfully disagree and I think you are somewhat misrepresenting me.
I will reiterate the point I made to you earlier in the thread. Jimmy Dunne has agency in this. You keep saying the club should be doing this or not doing that but this matters not a jot in this circumstance.
What contract Jimmy Dunne signs and with whom will be decided by one person, Jimmy himself. |
Hi Eastside, I don't think you can really mis-represent (and I'm summarising here) that you are thrilled that he is staying even if he leaves for free in the summer. As I said many fans feel the same way, but it is short-termism and does not benefit the club in any way. Whether Dunne stayed or went will have very little bearing on where we finish this season - which will probably be somewhere between 10th and 16th - but the 2M we (apparently) could have bagged for him, could, incrementally at least, have contributed to us being more financially competitive in this league. Whether Dunne leaves for free in the summer, or whether he stays for another 2/3 years he will never be as financially valuable to us again as he is now. He is a decent Championship player, no more, no less ( a thoroughly likeable and honest person, don't get me wrong), but the only reason, SU were even testing the water was because he was out of contract in the summer and they thought they could get him on the cheap. If they were really 'desperate' for a CB, their own John Egan was available on a free and surely a safe bet until the end of the season.
Of course, you are right when you say the player will ultimately decide when and where he will go, but that is not what I meant by saying we have to think about the club and not the player. The situation with Dunne and Paal, simply should not be allowed to happen. Sign an extension or be sold, with 2 years still on a contract should be the CLUB policy and I believe Nourry is edging towards that scenario. That is the only way the club can take back control. Think of all the great QPR players we have watched over the years, but once they leave - for whatever reason- we move onto the next one. Some players are always going to be more popular than others - Dunne and Paal are classic examples of that - but ultimately none of them are more important than moving the club forward. | | | |
| Dunne off? on 12:37 - Feb 5 with 686 views | GaryHaddock |
| Dunne off? on 12:33 - Feb 5 by Myke |
Hi Eastside, I don't think you can really mis-represent (and I'm summarising here) that you are thrilled that he is staying even if he leaves for free in the summer. As I said many fans feel the same way, but it is short-termism and does not benefit the club in any way. Whether Dunne stayed or went will have very little bearing on where we finish this season - which will probably be somewhere between 10th and 16th - but the 2M we (apparently) could have bagged for him, could, incrementally at least, have contributed to us being more financially competitive in this league. Whether Dunne leaves for free in the summer, or whether he stays for another 2/3 years he will never be as financially valuable to us again as he is now. He is a decent Championship player, no more, no less ( a thoroughly likeable and honest person, don't get me wrong), but the only reason, SU were even testing the water was because he was out of contract in the summer and they thought they could get him on the cheap. If they were really 'desperate' for a CB, their own John Egan was available on a free and surely a safe bet until the end of the season.
Of course, you are right when you say the player will ultimately decide when and where he will go, but that is not what I meant by saying we have to think about the club and not the player. The situation with Dunne and Paal, simply should not be allowed to happen. Sign an extension or be sold, with 2 years still on a contract should be the CLUB policy and I believe Nourry is edging towards that scenario. That is the only way the club can take back control. Think of all the great QPR players we have watched over the years, but once they leave - for whatever reason- we move onto the next one. Some players are always going to be more popular than others - Dunne and Paal are classic examples of that - but ultimately none of them are more important than moving the club forward. |
Wasn’t the £2m figure reliant on him winning the grand national or stealing the Koh-i-Noor or something?
£400k the upfront figure I heard, which defo isn’t enough. | | | |
| Dunne off? on 13:20 - Feb 5 with 513 views | ngbqpr |
| Dunne off? on 12:33 - Feb 5 by Myke |
Hi Eastside, I don't think you can really mis-represent (and I'm summarising here) that you are thrilled that he is staying even if he leaves for free in the summer. As I said many fans feel the same way, but it is short-termism and does not benefit the club in any way. Whether Dunne stayed or went will have very little bearing on where we finish this season - which will probably be somewhere between 10th and 16th - but the 2M we (apparently) could have bagged for him, could, incrementally at least, have contributed to us being more financially competitive in this league. Whether Dunne leaves for free in the summer, or whether he stays for another 2/3 years he will never be as financially valuable to us again as he is now. He is a decent Championship player, no more, no less ( a thoroughly likeable and honest person, don't get me wrong), but the only reason, SU were even testing the water was because he was out of contract in the summer and they thought they could get him on the cheap. If they were really 'desperate' for a CB, their own John Egan was available on a free and surely a safe bet until the end of the season.
Of course, you are right when you say the player will ultimately decide when and where he will go, but that is not what I meant by saying we have to think about the club and not the player. The situation with Dunne and Paal, simply should not be allowed to happen. Sign an extension or be sold, with 2 years still on a contract should be the CLUB policy and I believe Nourry is edging towards that scenario. That is the only way the club can take back control. Think of all the great QPR players we have watched over the years, but once they leave - for whatever reason- we move onto the next one. Some players are always going to be more popular than others - Dunne and Paal are classic examples of that - but ultimately none of them are more important than moving the club forward. |
With you on the principle...but it's not as simple as "sign an extension or be sold." What if there's no buyer? Or only derisory offers? Do we then just continue to pay them their (*salary figure redacted to retain competitive advantage*) while letting them (LFW Glossary klaxon) "rot in the reserves"?
It would appear this where we ended up with Paal after the summer window, we've elected to keep picking him. |  |
| |
| Dunne off? on 14:35 - Feb 5 with 365 views | Myke |
| Dunne off? on 13:20 - Feb 5 by ngbqpr |
With you on the principle...but it's not as simple as "sign an extension or be sold." What if there's no buyer? Or only derisory offers? Do we then just continue to pay them their (*salary figure redacted to retain competitive advantage*) while letting them (LFW Glossary klaxon) "rot in the reserves"?
It would appear this where we ended up with Paal after the summer window, we've elected to keep picking him. |
Yeah the Paal point is a fair one. I actually think he had shown great integrity considering the club clearly tried to move him on. I suppose no 'rule' is foolproof. But I do feel that we need to be more proactive in ensuring we get better deals for our better players. The next wave of talent coming along - Morgan, Kelly and Lloyd- it'll be interesting to see the club's (and the fans) stance on them in 2 years time | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
