| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 21:55 - Sep 3 with 5622 views | jack2jack |
'IT' was not the right fit, not HE, don't know if the wording is significant or not!
Just wondering! |  | |  |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:01 - Sep 3 with 5589 views | jackrmee |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 21:55 - Sep 3 by jack2jack |
'IT' was not the right fit, not HE, don't know if the wording is significant or not!
Just wondering! |
I copy/pasted it right from WOL article mate, so it must have said "he". |  |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:08 - Sep 3 with 5553 views | LeonWasGod |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 21:55 - Sep 3 by jack2jack |
'IT' was not the right fit, not HE, don't know if the wording is significant or not!
Just wondering! |
Are you saying it’s more likely to mean fit financially rather than technically, otherwise they wouldn’t have spent what seemed like weeks pursuing him? If so, I agree. |  | | |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:09 - Sep 3 with 5551 views | jackrmee |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:01 - Sep 3 by jackrmee |
I copy/pasted it right from WOL article mate, so it must have said "he". |
Ah I see what's happened...the transcript says "it" and the WOL article says "he". They've changed the wording for some unknown reason. Media aye 
Not that I think it means much tbh. | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:10 - Sep 3 with 5540 views | jack2jack |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:01 - Sep 3 by jackrmee |
I copy/pasted it right from WOL article mate, so it must have said "he". |
It deffo says it, which leads me to believe and I think it's been quoted, it was down to a few quid, which also says to me that they are not willing to put money in, for players who could add value, not much support for GP there is it.And it's not like we're talking millions.
I know we've got to balance the books, but sometimes it's speculate to accumulate.
Just my observation👠| | | |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:14 - Sep 3 with 5518 views | jackrmee |
"We’re not selling the club. We’re here to rebuild and we’re determined. So if anybody’s hoping we’re selling the club, they’re sorely mistaken."
"You’re going to be stuck with us for a while."
Dear me. | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:16 - Sep 3 with 5497 views | TNT |
I thought no negativity was allowed on here until January? |  |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:18 - Sep 3 with 5482 views | jack2jack |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:08 - Sep 3 by LeonWasGod |
Are you saying it’s more likely to mean fit financially rather than technically, otherwise they wouldn’t have spent what seemed like weeks pursuing him? If so, I agree. |
That's exactly what I'm saying.👠| | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:19 - Sep 3 with 5475 views | jackrmee |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:16 - Sep 3 by TNT |
I thought no negativity was allowed on here until January? |
 | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:24 - Sep 3 with 5433 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:16 - Sep 3 by TNT |
I thought no negativity was allowed on here until January? |
Forgot to send my Xmas cards, damn. |  |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:25 - Sep 3 with 5429 views | _ |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:10 - Sep 3 by jack2jack |
It deffo says it, which leads me to believe and I think it's been quoted, it was down to a few quid, which also says to me that they are not willing to put money in, for players who could add value, not much support for GP there is it.And it's not like we're talking millions.
I know we've got to balance the books, but sometimes it's speculate to accumulate.
Just my observation👠|
No, it suggests £6.5m was a pisstake from a lower league club for one of their players that hadn't played the last 12 games where they'd won 10 of them. |  |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:26 - Sep 3 with 5422 views | jackrmee |
TBF that is quite a decent interview and they come out sounding rather tidy and talking sense.
Of course, it could well be a piece of sheepskin being draped across my retinas, but who knows? [Post edited 3 Sep 2018 22:28]
| |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:28 - Sep 3 with 5405 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:26 - Sep 3 by jackrmee |
TBF that is quite a decent interview and they come out sounding rather tidy and talking sense.
Of course, it could well be a piece of sheepskin being draped across my retinas, but who knows? [Post edited 3 Sep 2018 22:28]
|
Could be, one things for sure the sellouts got this all wrong. | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:31 - Sep 3 with 5379 views | longlostjack |
“He is very effective in the role he plays, but ultimately when we did our diligence we thought it was not the ideal fit for us at this time.“
That would be the same diligence that got us Bobbly Bradley would it clueless Jason? Has that diligence got a name? Landon perhaps? |  |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:33 - Sep 3 with 5368 views | jack2jack |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:25 - Sep 3 by _ |
No, it suggests £6.5m was a pisstake from a lower league club for one of their players that hadn't played the last 12 games where they'd won 10 of them. |
Well if he hadn't played, and he was persona non what's it why did we go to the wire with it, no they were arguing over a few quid for a player that Potter wanted, but they let him down, and don't start on players that we've payed to much for, sometimes twice. | | | |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:33 - Sep 3 with 5366 views | jackrmee |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:31 - Sep 3 by longlostjack |
“He is very effective in the role he plays, but ultimately when we did our diligence we thought it was not the ideal fit for us at this time.“
That would be the same diligence that got us Bobbly Bradley would it clueless Jason? Has that diligence got a name? Landon perhaps? |
Maybe they just mean that they think he's heck of a player, but a bit of a prick | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:36 - Sep 3 with 5346 views | longlostjack |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:33 - Sep 3 by jackrmee |
Maybe they just mean that they think he's heck of a player, but a bit of a prick |
It would take one to know one I suppose. | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:43 - Sep 3 with 5296 views | _ |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:33 - Sep 3 by jack2jack |
Well if he hadn't played, and he was persona non what's it why did we go to the wire with it, no they were arguing over a few quid for a player that Potter wanted, but they let him down, and don't start on players that we've payed to much for, sometimes twice. |
To get him at a price we felt more comfortable in spending of course. | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:45 - Sep 3 with 5280 views | TheKirkyLife |
As much as I despise these people I have to agree that a lot of this interview makes sense lining up with rumours heard and confirmed.
We ARE still paying the price for Premier League fire fighting. Avoiding Woods sounds like trying to ensure we don't have a repeat of Roque Mesa. Certainly the feeling I get is that we'll be better prepared in January to invest.
Just hope we're still in and around the play-off picture by then to actually make it worth the time. |  | | |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:48 - Sep 3 with 5256 views | jack2jack |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:43 - Sep 3 by _ |
To get him at a price we felt more comfortable in spending of course. |
Yes yes we all know we're in the sh!t financially. | | | |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:48 - Sep 3 with 5255 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:45 - Sep 3 by TheKirkyLife |
As much as I despise these people I have to agree that a lot of this interview makes sense lining up with rumours heard and confirmed.
We ARE still paying the price for Premier League fire fighting. Avoiding Woods sounds like trying to ensure we don't have a repeat of Roque Mesa. Certainly the feeling I get is that we'll be better prepared in January to invest.
Just hope we're still in and around the play-off picture by then to actually make it worth the time. |
I have a funny feeling that an orderly restructuring would not necessarily include as many wingers. | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:50 - Sep 3 with 5243 views | jackrmee |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:33 - Sep 3 by jack2jack |
Well if he hadn't played, and he was persona non what's it why did we go to the wire with it, no they were arguing over a few quid for a player that Potter wanted, but they let him down, and don't start on players that we've payed to much for, sometimes twice. |
Sounds like, they thought he was a prick, but if they could get him at a bargain price then that would have been OK.
I can see the sense in that tbh. | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:53 - Sep 3 with 5231 views | jackrmee |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:48 - Sep 3 by JACKMANANDBOY |
I have a funny feeling that an orderly restructuring would not necessarily include as many wingers. |
Aye, they wanted rid of Narsingh, Routs and Dyer, hence why they haven't played I think.
Probably go in January along with Bony and get some more youngsters in | |
| |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:56 - Sep 3 with 5205 views | scottishjack |
Honestly, at the end of a weekend where the players and manager snatch an unlikely win? Where there’s the slightest hint of a bit of feel good? They release this?
And suddenly I’m f**king furious again... Brilliant! |  | | |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 23:02 - Sep 3 with 5176 views | _ |
| Statement from The Moneysnatchers in Washington. on 22:56 - Sep 3 by scottishjack |
Honestly, at the end of a weekend where the players and manager snatch an unlikely win? Where there’s the slightest hint of a bit of feel good? They release this?
And suddenly I’m f**king furious again... Brilliant! |
Well that's ridiculous as there's nothing in that interview that doesn't just sum things up precisely.
It's fair and open and has given us an insight into their plans for the Club
Seriously, fans just want to make an issue over anything. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
