I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 15:23 - Mar 12 with 6500 views | nedflanders | Three days gone and I am still fuming. Not only did we lose, it also cost me a grand..... | | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:24 - Mar 12 with 5076 views | adhoc_qpr | Sue Bob Pollack? | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:27 - Mar 12 with 5063 views | stowmarketrange | I thought I heard on Talksh-t on Saturday that some bookies were paying out for Hill as 1st goalscorer.I know Ladbrokes were one of the names mentioned. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:29 - Mar 12 with 5054 views | Jamie | William Hill paid out. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:32 - Mar 12 with 5042 views | nedflanders |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:27 - Mar 12 by stowmarketrange | I thought I heard on Talksh-t on Saturday that some bookies were paying out for Hill as 1st goalscorer.I know Ladbrokes were one of the names mentioned. |
Yep, i heard a few are too. Unfortunately not the firm i backed it at. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:45 - Mar 12 with 5012 views | bosh67 | Wow, you really are having a f*cking bad start to the week. | |
| |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:47 - Mar 12 with 4998 views | collegeranger | Who did you place the bet with? | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:48 - Mar 12 with 4994 views | collegeranger |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:32 - Mar 12 by nedflanders | Yep, i heard a few are too. Unfortunately not the firm i backed it at. |
Who did you place the bet with? | | | | Login to get fewer ads
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:48 - Mar 12 with 4984 views | WeAreQPR12 |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:47 - Mar 12 by collegeranger | Who did you place the bet with? |
yeah what bookies? all sounds a bit fishy 2 me | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:52 - Mar 12 with 4975 views | carrotcrunch_R | omg unlucky | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:55 - Mar 12 with 4968 views | LadyRanger | ladbrokes, coral, william hill and paddy power all paid out who did you back it with dontexist.com very sad | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:55 - Mar 12 with 4966 views | LadyRanger | ladbrokes, coral, william hill and paddy power all paid out who did you back it with dontexist.com very sad | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:34 - Mar 12 with 4892 views | nedflanders |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 15:48 - Mar 12 by WeAreQPR12 | yeah what bookies? all sounds a bit fishy 2 me |
Yes, i feel the need to lie about it. I felt i would just post on here a complete lie about a bet i didn't have. I work in the industry and therefore wont name the firm involved as if they choose not to pay out - as they are currently stating they wont - then they are in their rights to do this as stated in their rules. Any mention of their name with regards this issue would be derogatory to the firm for something that isn't technically their fault. I just was bemoaning my luck thats all. Geez Clive, i see what you mean about some of the comments on here. Unbelievable.... | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:37 - Mar 12 with 4884 views | Watford_Ranger |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:34 - Mar 12 by nedflanders | Yes, i feel the need to lie about it. I felt i would just post on here a complete lie about a bet i didn't have. I work in the industry and therefore wont name the firm involved as if they choose not to pay out - as they are currently stating they wont - then they are in their rights to do this as stated in their rules. Any mention of their name with regards this issue would be derogatory to the firm for something that isn't technically their fault. I just was bemoaning my luck thats all. Geez Clive, i see what you mean about some of the comments on here. Unbelievable.... |
I don't see how it would be derogatory to say 'I had a tenner on player x at firm y'. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:45 - Mar 12 with 4860 views | Snipper | Well i'd name & shame the firm. You'd also be helping us stay away from betting with the shysters. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:56 - Mar 12 with 4831 views | EssexR |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:45 - Mar 12 by Snipper | Well i'd name & shame the firm. You'd also be helping us stay away from betting with the shysters. |
First post, annoyed enough to register. Bet365 didn't pay out. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:58 - Mar 12 with 4822 views | Snipper |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:56 - Mar 12 by EssexR | First post, annoyed enough to register. Bet365 didn't pay out. |
How much did you have on Clint Hill? | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 17:03 - Mar 12 with 4807 views | Watford_Ranger |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:56 - Mar 12 by EssexR | First post, annoyed enough to register. Bet365 didn't pay out. |
Call them up and say you'll never use them again. Given how small their liability must be they may well cave. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 17:03 - Mar 12 with 4807 views | EssexR |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:58 - Mar 12 by Snipper | How much did you have on Clint Hill? |
Small change, certainly not enough to worry about and not to the extent of the original poster. However, rather in my pocket that the bookies. Wasn't bothered about not being paid out if all bookies were consistent. That's the annoying thing. Time to change accounts. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 17:07 - Mar 12 with 4780 views | W7Ranger |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:34 - Mar 12 by nedflanders | Yes, i feel the need to lie about it. I felt i would just post on here a complete lie about a bet i didn't have. I work in the industry and therefore wont name the firm involved as if they choose not to pay out - as they are currently stating they wont - then they are in their rights to do this as stated in their rules. Any mention of their name with regards this issue would be derogatory to the firm for something that isn't technically their fault. I just was bemoaning my luck thats all. Geez Clive, i see what you mean about some of the comments on here. Unbelievable.... |
Get stake money back at least surely??? | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 17:08 - Mar 12 with 4780 views | nedflanders |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:45 - Mar 12 by Snipper | Well i'd name & shame the firm. You'd also be helping us stay away from betting with the shysters. |
Hi Snipper - thats pretty much why i wont name the firm. They haven't done anything wrong by not paying out, would of been nice if the firm in question had followed suit and made an ex-gratia payment but they have explained their reasoning to me as to why they won't and in all honesty, its not their fault the linesman was incompetent. Anyway, things can only get better. Onwards and upwards to Cheltenham!! | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 17:20 - Mar 12 with 4757 views | LadyRanger |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:34 - Mar 12 by nedflanders | Yes, i feel the need to lie about it. I felt i would just post on here a complete lie about a bet i didn't have. I work in the industry and therefore wont name the firm involved as if they choose not to pay out - as they are currently stating they wont - then they are in their rights to do this as stated in their rules. Any mention of their name with regards this issue would be derogatory to the firm for something that isn't technically their fault. I just was bemoaning my luck thats all. Geez Clive, i see what you mean about some of the comments on here. Unbelievable.... |
oh well you never miss what you never had. and by the way you lost a score at the most not a grand at all. did i miss 7 million on the lottery by not having six numbers no i lost a quid. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 17:20 - Mar 12 with 4755 views | LadyRanger |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 16:34 - Mar 12 by nedflanders | Yes, i feel the need to lie about it. I felt i would just post on here a complete lie about a bet i didn't have. I work in the industry and therefore wont name the firm involved as if they choose not to pay out - as they are currently stating they wont - then they are in their rights to do this as stated in their rules. Any mention of their name with regards this issue would be derogatory to the firm for something that isn't technically their fault. I just was bemoaning my luck thats all. Geez Clive, i see what you mean about some of the comments on here. Unbelievable.... |
oh well you never miss what you never had. and by the way you lost a score at the most not a grand at all. did i miss 7 million on the lottery by not having six numbers no i lost a quid. | | | |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 19:04 - Mar 12 with 4662 views | W7Ranger |
I backed Clint Hill to score first on Sat at 66/1 on 17:20 - Mar 12 by LadyRanger | oh well you never miss what you never had. and by the way you lost a score at the most not a grand at all. did i miss 7 million on the lottery by not having six numbers no i lost a quid. |
What if you'd forgotten to do the Lottery one Saturday and the 6 numbers you've used for donkeys years come in. Do you still think "oh well, I've still got my Pound"??? | | | |
| |