| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? 17:46 - Feb 17 with 3697 views | extratimeR |
How the hell did he do that? Diving backwards and heading it up and behind?
The Bristol player on our Goal line couldn't believe it. |  | | |  |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:01 - Feb 17 with 3597 views | HammersmithR |
Was offside | | | |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:07 - Feb 17 with 3521 views | ParkRoyalR |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:01 - Feb 17 by HammersmithR |
Was offside |
In fairness, Field didn't know that, just shows his desire and what he brings to this team,
In a game off fine margins, Field defending the near-post corners in our last two games could have made a difference. | | | |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:17 - Feb 17 with 3434 views | KerryE |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:01 - Feb 17 by HammersmithR |
Was offside |
Gordon Banks was onside  | | | |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:26 - Feb 17 with 3362 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:01 - Feb 17 by HammersmithR |
Was offside |
Thanks. I was wondering what the free was for. I was hoping that it was for a foul on Field as that would have made the clearance even better.
Extraordinary clearance. |  |
| |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:35 - Feb 17 with 3290 views | Toast_R |
Almost as good as the Argentinian who stole Linekers equaliser in 86. |  | | |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:46 - Feb 17 with 3206 views | SK_hoops |
Going to be hard to pick a starting 11 now. Field, Anderson, Hodges, Hayden, Colback, Chair, Willock. All of them could be starters.
Hopefully the competition will get them playing even better. [Post edited 17 Feb 18:47]
| | | |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:55 - Feb 17 with 3164 views | Jules4367 |
Yep but why do we keep allowing flick ons from corners?!!!
On any other day (and probably against Rotherham) that would have been a goal !
Happy for the win but all another team has to do is look at the recordings and see where our continued weakness lies.
This is not being negative..we ALL can see that teams know we cannot defend corners. Some may say Field was defending whereas the realist will say it was luck and the ball should have been nowhere near heading (no pun intended) towards our goal line!
A fabulous result today but reality says - beware! | | | |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 19:08 - Feb 17 with 3083 views | VancouverHoop |
A fabulous result today but reality says - beware!
"Reality?".... What a concept! Who expects reality when you support QPR? | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 21:34 - Feb 17 with 2760 views | FredManRave |
| Was Sam Fields Backward Header Goal Save Better than Gordon Banks In Mexico? on 18:26 - Feb 17 by BrianMcCarthy |
Thanks. I was wondering what the free was for. I was hoping that it was for a foul on Field as that would have made the clearance even better.
Extraordinary clearance. |
It was a foul.
That's based on nothing more than I want it to have been.
So, therefore, it's now fact.
In the future, when there are unbelievable goal line clearances, they'll be calling them a, "Fielder".
Fact. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
