| Right then ye f..... 19:26 - Aug 4 with 24933 views | TheResurrection |
Have a bit of that.
Young side, trying to play football, dug in and get the rewards.
To the usual fackwits on Planet tvvat, fack you...
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:02 - Aug 5 with 1496 views | builthjack |
Clucas true value when we signed him was nearer £10m.
A panic buy.
So if we get £8m for him that's about right.
Also, as he is on £57k a week here, and his wages will drop to nearer £30-£35k, he will demand a signing on fee of around £2m.
So we end of with £6m.
So our loss will be in the region of £9.7m.
But... does anyone want him? |  |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:04 - Aug 5 with 1487 views | Treforys_Jack |
Why do people engage with this poster is beyond me. Thread after thread having to have the last word. |  | | |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:05 - Aug 5 with 1481 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:04 - Aug 5 by Treforys_Jack |
Why do people engage with this poster is beyond me. Thread after thread having to have the last word. |
Because when he lies about people, they have to defend themselves against it.
Other people might decide to let it go but I will happily call him out on it everytime. |  |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:07 - Aug 5 with 1466 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:02 - Aug 5 by builthjack |
Clucas true value when we signed him was nearer £10m.
A panic buy.
So if we get £8m for him that's about right.
Also, as he is on £57k a week here, and his wages will drop to nearer £30-£35k, he will demand a signing on fee of around £2m.
So we end of with £6m.
So our loss will be in the region of £9.7m.
But... does anyone want him? |
The buying club pays a signing on fee, not the selling club.
It’s also known as a loyalty payment and split over the length of the contract. If they hand in a transfer request they lose the remainder of it. [Post edited 5 Aug 2018 11:08]
| |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:07 - Aug 5 with 1466 views | Wingstandwood |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:02 - Aug 5 by builthjack |
Clucas true value when we signed him was nearer £10m.
A panic buy.
So if we get £8m for him that's about right.
Also, as he is on £57k a week here, and his wages will drop to nearer £30-£35k, he will demand a signing on fee of around £2m.
So we end of with £6m.
So our loss will be in the region of £9.7m.
But... does anyone want him? |
That Swansea Sound commentator at an away game certainly doesn't want him i.e. the angry "Sam Bloody Clucas" descriptive sort of said it all......Great signing Jenkins Boi.
Looks like the deal is off and the club is going have to continue to pay the wasters wages! [Post edited 5 Aug 2018 11:14]
|  |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:08 - Aug 5 with 1466 views | Treforys_Jack |
Peoples posting styles are hard to change even when using a different username. | | | |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:09 - Aug 5 with 1451 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:08 - Aug 5 by Treforys_Jack |
Peoples posting styles are hard to change even when using a different username. |
As is their common sense apparently. | |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:09 - Aug 5 with 1453 views | builthjack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:07 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
The buying club pays a signing on fee, not the selling club.
It’s also known as a loyalty payment and split over the length of the contract. If they hand in a transfer request they lose the remainder of it. [Post edited 5 Aug 2018 11:08]
|
It depend s on the agreement between clubs.
Swansea are looking to get him off the books and will take the loss. | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:10 - Aug 5 with 1444 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:09 - Aug 5 by builthjack |
It depend s on the agreement between clubs.
Swansea are looking to get him off the books and will take the loss. |
No it doesn’t.
A loyalty bonus is an agreement between the buying club and player. | |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:11 - Aug 5 with 1444 views | 34dfgdf54 |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:01 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
You said that I claimed Clucas would not lose value.
That is a lie.
Shown as an off the cuff lie by the fact last week you said I had called it perfectly when it was reported we would lose 25% on him.
Keep up. |
So just to clarify, losing 50%, is “retaining value” to you yeah? Genuine question. |  | | |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:12 - Aug 5 with 1439 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:11 - Aug 5 by 34dfgdf54 |
So just to clarify, losing 50%, is “retaining value” to you yeah? Genuine question. |
Getting £8m-£10m is clearly retaining value yes. [Post edited 5 Aug 2018 11:18]
| |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:14 - Aug 5 with 1425 views | builthjack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:10 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
No it doesn’t.
A loyalty bonus is an agreement between the buying club and player. |
You know for sure in this case? | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:17 - Aug 5 with 1406 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:14 - Aug 5 by builthjack |
You know for sure in this case? |
Absolutely. It is an incentive to stay at the club, it is released yearly to the player. A signing on fee, is another term for the loyalty payments you hear about. | |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:26 - Aug 5 with 1376 views | icecoldjack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:12 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
Getting £8m-£10m is clearly retaining value yes. [Post edited 5 Aug 2018 11:18]
|
No, it means you've lost £9m .
You haven't "retained" anything at all .
If you bought a house for 500k and then sold it for 250k would you go around telling people it retained it's value ? nope, you'd say "i been a daft feck and i lost 250k on that house" |  | | |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:27 - Aug 5 with 1362 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:26 - Aug 5 by icecoldjack |
No, it means you've lost £9m .
You haven't "retained" anything at all .
If you bought a house for 500k and then sold it for 250k would you go around telling people it retained it's value ? nope, you'd say "i been a daft feck and i lost 250k on that house" |
Of course you have.
You will lose money on most big money signings if relegated, as I stated at the time. But a British big money signing tends to retain more of their value than foreign ones.
That simple.
(And if you think we paid either £17m or £19m for Clucas then you are barking). [Post edited 5 Aug 2018 11:28]
| |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:28 - Aug 5 with 1363 views | builthjack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:17 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
Absolutely. It is an incentive to stay at the club, it is released yearly to the player. A signing on fee, is another term for the loyalty payments you hear about. |
I know different in this particular case.
Anyway, time to do some gardening. See ya. | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:30 - Aug 5 with 1351 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:28 - Aug 5 by builthjack |
I know different in this particular case.
Anyway, time to do some gardening. See ya. |
Then you are wrong. Quite simply.
Enjoy the gardening. | |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:31 - Aug 5 with 1353 views | 34dfgdf54 |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:30 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
Then you are wrong. Quite simply.
Enjoy the gardening. |
Oh look.
Wrong again. | | | |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:32 - Aug 5 with 1342 views | E20Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:31 - Aug 5 by 34dfgdf54 |
Oh look.
Wrong again. |
Oh no, please don’t tell me you are also claiming that a signing on fee is paid by the selling club?  | |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:44 - Aug 5 with 1307 views | Neath_Jack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 10:40 - Aug 5 by Darran |
It absolutely baffles me why anyone on here other than The Res replies to E20.
You don’t have to be editor of The Lancet to realise there’s some kind of syndrome like Aspergers going on there.
Leave the bloke alone FFS. |
Because he is one of the best posters this site has ever seen.
Therefore, a lot of posters try and prove how clever they are, by trying to get one over on him. They cannot resist it, like moths to a flame.
Then they get angry and abusive.
Repeat. |  |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:47 - Aug 5 with 1294 views | icecoldjack |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:27 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
Of course you have.
You will lose money on most big money signings if relegated, as I stated at the time. But a British big money signing tends to retain more of their value than foreign ones.
That simple.
(And if you think we paid either £17m or £19m for Clucas then you are barking). [Post edited 5 Aug 2018 11:28]
|
£17m was reported by many, £15m by others, the coont has already done us for a couple of million in wages and signing on bonuses so yeah, it's closer to £17m invested in the boy.
"A British big money signing tends to retain more of their value..unless his name is Sam Clucas" is a better way to put it !
What you mean is in buying an over priced British player you won't quite lose as much if relegated as if you'd bought an overseas player right ?, of course that's just not true but never mind.
There is no retaining of value in selling players at a loss, if there was Huw and Co. would be the worlds financial wizards and the Swans the envy of the world ! notice they arn't and the club is on the brink ?
I know what your getting at but in the real world if buy a player for £17m and sell him for £8m you've made a loss and have retained fook all . | | | |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:51 - Aug 5 with 1282 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:07 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
The buying club pays a signing on fee, not the selling club.
It’s also known as a loyalty payment and split over the length of the contract. If they hand in a transfer request they lose the remainder of it. [Post edited 5 Aug 2018 11:08]
|
There are many instances where a selling club will pay a lump sum to a player to cover a shortfall in wages at the next club if they want him out.
It doesn’t really matter what you call it, if a player has 3 years left on a contract and the new club is paying him say £20k a week less than he would have earned, that shortfall is made up by the selling club if they want the player gone.
Not saying that’s the case with Clucas by the way. |  | | |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 12:14 - Aug 5 with 1218 views | 34dfgdf54 |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:32 - Aug 5 by E20Jack |
Oh no, please don’t tell me you are also claiming that a signing on fee is paid by the selling club? |
What Lisa said above. She’s a lot better with her words than me.
So I’ll just go with.
You’re wrong. Yet again. | | | |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 12:14 - Aug 5 with 1217 views | Loyal |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 19:27 - Aug 4 by Nogginthenog |
Have an up arrow res |
I've down arrowed you chris, just because I can 😘 |  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 12:26 - Aug 5 with 1181 views | LeonWasGod |
| Right then ye facking kunts on 11:04 - Aug 5 by Treforys_Jack |
Why do people engage with this poster is beyond me. Thread after thread having to have the last word. |
 |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
