| Laudrup to QPR on 18:18 - Feb 25 with 1934 views | jacksinceever |
| Laudrup to QPR on 18:06 - Feb 25 by Uxbridge |
Well, my thoughts on that particular topic are known, however in the interests of balance it should be pointed out that the figures taken out are still relatively small (the equivalent of a 12 week Zaha loan fee) and their combined renumeration apart from dividends over the last 10 years is less than Karren Brady was paid for the last year by West Ham.
I'm not a fan of the divi payments but such things should be put in context, and they are not incompatible with the argument that way more often than not their decisions are made in the best interests of the club. Laudrup fans may disagree but the evidence is looking pretty strong so far that his departure has helped. It's sad that the "owned by fans and run by fans" mantra no longer holds true for many though, and there are a fair few reasons for that. |
Good post, though I feel that overall we are one of the most democratically run clubs in the country. I'd rather see our current set-up than have a multi-millionaire of any persuasion using us as his plaything at sacking managers and staff at will |  | |  |
| Laudrup to QPR on 18:34 - Feb 25 with 1907 views | Spratty |
“I want to make it clear – I am speaking on behalf of Michael Laudrup,” - so Michael it was something to do with you. Now who is the liar?
Mmmmmm slight logic flaw there - did ML confirm that he had authorised Tutu to say that even if that was his opinion? On the basis of not jumping to assumptions |  | | |
| Laudrup to QPR on 18:52 - Feb 25 with 1866 views | Banosswan |
| Laudrup to QPR on 18:06 - Feb 25 by Uxbridge |
Well, my thoughts on that particular topic are known, however in the interests of balance it should be pointed out that the figures taken out are still relatively small (the equivalent of a 12 week Zaha loan fee) and their combined renumeration apart from dividends over the last 10 years is less than Karren Brady was paid for the last year by West Ham.
I'm not a fan of the divi payments but such things should be put in context, and they are not incompatible with the argument that way more often than not their decisions are made in the best interests of the club. Laudrup fans may disagree but the evidence is looking pretty strong so far that his departure has helped. It's sad that the "owned by fans and run by fans" mantra no longer holds true for many though, and there are a fair few reasons for that. |
Remuneration.... |  |
| Ever since my son was... never conceived, because I've never had consensual sex without money involved... I've always kind of looked at you as... a thing, that I could live next to... in accordance with state laws. | | Poll: | How do you like your steak? |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:10 - Feb 25 with 1823 views | Spratty |
| Laudrup to QPR on 17:03 - Feb 25 by ItchySphincter |
Been saying it for weeks. |
Sorry must have missed it.
Recall some of your literary greats like Tw*t - normally hidden in Dazza's shadow.
However nothing of substance except possibly suggesting I wanted the team to lose - epic fail there. Was one of our most vocal supporters cheering the team on when they went 2 down on Sunday. Perhaps you think that was delight at losing? There were certainly a fair number of Liverpool supporters amongst us cheering their team on.
Don't judge others by your own standards.  Although judging by the lack of leadership on the pitch pre Feb 4th I must admit to similar fleeting thoughts of sabotage. Still good to see the sulking seems to have stopped. | | | |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:22 - Feb 25 with 1803 views | swanny |
| Laudrup to QPR on 17:34 - Feb 25 by clement |
so is he going to qpr then? |
wish he bloody would and take all his fanboys with him xxx |  |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:27 - Feb 25 with 1795 views | exiledclaseboy |
What a strange thread. How many other manager sackings make it as far as the High Court? Will this one? Will it f*ck. Will Laudrup sue Jenkins for "defamation"? Will he f*ck. Will this get settled between lawyers for the two parties who will come to an agreement on behalf of their clients. Of course it will.
I know for a fact that at least one fully qualified and practising solicitor has posted on this thread. Guess who it isn't. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:30 - Feb 25 with 1785 views | swanny |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:27 - Feb 25 by exiledclaseboy |
What a strange thread. How many other manager sackings make it as far as the High Court? Will this one? Will it f*ck. Will Laudrup sue Jenkins for "defamation"? Will he f*ck. Will this get settled between lawyers for the two parties who will come to an agreement on behalf of their clients. Of course it will.
I know for a fact that at least one fully qualified and practising solicitor has posted on this thread. Guess who it isn't. |
I'm sorry :( I know I've been dragging it on but I couldn't resist. .....mea culpa | |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:34 - Feb 25 with 1764 views | Dr_Winston |
| Laudrup to QPR on 18:34 - Feb 25 by Spratty |
“I want to make it clear – I am speaking on behalf of Michael Laudrup,” - so Michael it was something to do with you. Now who is the liar?
Mmmmmm slight logic flaw there - did ML confirm that he had authorised Tutu to say that even if that was his opinion? On the basis of not jumping to assumptions |
No. I'm sure that Laudrup's friend and agent of more than 20 years standing decided to publically chastise his clients employers entirely of his own free will. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:35 - Feb 25 with 1758 views | Starsky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:27 - Feb 25 by exiledclaseboy |
What a strange thread. How many other manager sackings make it as far as the High Court? Will this one? Will it f*ck. Will Laudrup sue Jenkins for "defamation"? Will he f*ck. Will this get settled between lawyers for the two parties who will come to an agreement on behalf of their clients. Of course it will.
I know for a fact that at least one fully qualified and practising solicitor has posted on this thread. Guess who it isn't. |
Who the feck is Sue Jenkins? |  |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:36 - Feb 25 with 1750 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:35 - Feb 25 by Starsky |
Who the feck is Sue Jenkins? |
Arf. Thought I'd mistyped for a second there.  | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:41 - Feb 25 with 1724 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:30 - Feb 25 by swanny |
I'm sorry :( I know I've been dragging it on but I couldn't resist. .....mea culpa |
Well I'd never have guessed that, except for where I guessed that a page or so ago.
Where you will recall I also enquired as to your specialised subject; no doubt you'll forgive Exlied, who apparently hasn't grasped that different lawyers do different types of work. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:45 - Feb 25 with 1715 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:41 - Feb 25 by Shaky |
Well I'd never have guessed that, except for where I guessed that a page or so ago.
Where you will recall I also enquired as to your specialised subject; no doubt you'll forgive Exlied, who apparently hasn't grasped that different lawyers do different types of work. |
To be fair, I wasn't referring to Swanny. If she is indeed a fully qualified and practising solicitor that means that two such people have posted on this thread. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:47 - Feb 25 with 1704 views | Darran |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:27 - Feb 25 by exiledclaseboy |
What a strange thread. How many other manager sackings make it as far as the High Court? Will this one? Will it f*ck. Will Laudrup sue Jenkins for "defamation"? Will he f*ck. Will this get settled between lawyers for the two parties who will come to an agreement on behalf of their clients. Of course it will.
I know for a fact that at least one fully qualified and practising solicitor has posted on this thread. Guess who it isn't. |
I've been saying it for a couple of weeks now,thousands of managerial sackings in my lifetime but I' I can't ever remember a fuss like this.
And I wholeheartedly agree with you absolutely nothing will happen as much as Shaky,Sproutty and TDH want it too. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:50 - Feb 25 with 1694 views | monmouth |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:45 - Feb 25 by exiledclaseboy |
To be fair, I wasn't referring to Swanny. If she is indeed a fully qualified and practising solicitor that means that two such people have posted on this thread. |
Amongst a fair few fully qualified dickheads? |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:50 - Feb 25 with 1687 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:45 - Feb 25 by exiledclaseboy |
To be fair, I wasn't referring to Swanny. If she is indeed a fully qualified and practising solicitor that means that two such people have posted on this thread. |
You miss the point I was making that a "fully qualified and practising solicitor" may or may not have something to add to the discussion depending on his/her specialisation.
A partner in corporate law at Allen & Overy would be handy, some divorce lawyer not so much. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:50 - Feb 25 with 1690 views | swanny |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:45 - Feb 25 by exiledclaseboy |
To be fair, I wasn't referring to Swanny. If she is indeed a fully qualified and practising solicitor that means that two such people have posted on this thread. |
Pfft - not guilty, just interested in pointing out the bleedin' obvious.....ie there are two sides to every story and as is proved by the Leon Knight episode.....we mostly get to know the square route of fudge
all.
As long as my team continue to play with fight and commitment, I am happy to stand four square behind the current board. | |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:58 - Feb 25 with 1594 views | waynekerr55 |
| Laudrup to QPR on 18:34 - Feb 25 by Spratty |
“I want to make it clear – I am speaking on behalf of Michael Laudrup,” - so Michael it was something to do with you. Now who is the liar?
Mmmmmm slight logic flaw there - did ML confirm that he had authorised Tutu to say that even if that was his opinion? On the basis of not jumping to assumptions |
Logic flaw????? - Bayram is his agent. That's right, a paid employee of his.
In response Mr Laudrup responded that it was nothing to do with him.
He also made reference that Bayram is his agent at Hilton T4.
Spratty your normally quite balanced (despite what others think) but to infer what you just said is pretty blinkered IMO.
Suppose it's a case of agreeing to disagree on this one |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:59 - Feb 25 with 1588 views | waynekerr55 |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:34 - Feb 25 by Dr_Winston |
No. I'm sure that Laudrup's friend and agent of more than 20 years standing decided to publically chastise his clients employers entirely of his own free will. |
Love is blind doc, love is blind  | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:01 - Feb 25 with 1583 views | reddythered |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:58 - Feb 25 by waynekerr55 |
Logic flaw????? - Bayram is his agent. That's right, a paid employee of his.
In response Mr Laudrup responded that it was nothing to do with him.
He also made reference that Bayram is his agent at Hilton T4.
Spratty your normally quite balanced (despite what others think) but to infer what you just said is pretty blinkered IMO.
Suppose it's a case of agreeing to disagree on this one |
Normally, you'd be right, Laudrup using his agent to create the illusion of plausibility of denial.
However, his agent is batshit certified f***ing loopy, so it may be Laudrup hasn't instructed him with regards to public comments. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:04 - Feb 25 with 1574 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:01 - Feb 25 by reddythered |
Normally, you'd be right, Laudrup using his agent to create the illusion of plausibility of denial.
However, his agent is batshit certified f***ing loopy, so it may be Laudrup hasn't instructed him with regards to public comments. |
Yes, but he openly called Huw a liar, something he hasn't been able to back up. How Laudrup never came out and publicaly denounced those comments made against his employer has left a bad taste in my mouth . He deserved to go over that |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:07 - Feb 25 with 1561 views | Darran |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:04 - Feb 25 by Brynmill_Jack |
Yes, but he openly called Huw a liar, something he hasn't been able to back up. How Laudrup never came out and publicaly denounced those comments made against his employer has left a bad taste in my mouth . He deserved to go over that |
I've also been told about an incident at Old Trafford last away game last season to do with Byron Tittymilk too. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:07 - Feb 25 with 1560 views | tomdickharry |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:47 - Feb 25 by Darran |
I've been saying it for a couple of weeks now,thousands of managerial sackings in my lifetime but I' I can't ever remember a fuss like this.
And I wholeheartedly agree with you absolutely nothing will happen as much as Shaky,Sproutty and TDH want it too. |
Let you into a secret Daz I would have sacked Laudrup last summer but that's another story.
Definition of a consultant -How to get it wrong with confidence one could also level that quote at Lemmings falling over a cliff. That's one for you to work out.  | | | |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:11 - Feb 25 with 1546 views | Darran |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:07 - Feb 25 by tomdickharry |
Let you into a secret Daz I would have sacked Laudrup last summer but that's another story.
Definition of a consultant -How to get it wrong with confidence one could also level that quote at Lemmings falling over a cliff. That's one for you to work out. |
I don't do working out Ed hes gone and that's all that matters. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:15 - Feb 25 with 1530 views | Dr_Winston |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:59 - Feb 25 by waynekerr55 |
Love is blind doc, love is blind |
It truly amazes me that people still think (or choose to believe) that agents agitate against clubs without the players/managers they represent knowing anything about it.
Do they honestly think that Neil Taylor knew nothing about Jamie Moralee deciding to hint about him wanting a move if he doesn't play more games? Or that Tutumlu made public statements about our dealings with Laudrup without clearing it with him first?
Tutumlu was Laudrup's shield. The proxy he used to be critical in public whilst avoiding having to do the dirty work himself. | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:15 - Feb 25 with 1529 views | tomdickharry |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:11 - Feb 25 by Darran |
I don't do working out Ed hes gone and that's all that matters. |
You spot on Daz,think we are all agreed on that . | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
