 | Forum
Reply | Independent Supporters Group
at 23:15 4 Dec 2017
One question. Have you ever met Uxbridge & actually spoken to him in person? Actually, make that two. What gives you the right to your opinion but not him to his? |
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 19:24 13 Nov 2017
I am not someone using a secondary user name.
I am actually a person who chooses not to disclose their identity. Because I don't have to. I haven't demanded that anyone reveal their identities, I don't wish to know. If you choose to do so, that's your call.
The only time people start calling for posters to identify themselves is when said poster disagrees with the opinions of some people on here. Then all the accusations about user names begins, frankly that's just paranoia on some folk's parts.
Fear not, I shan't post again, defending anyone or anything. It's just not fun, which is what a good old debate should be. |
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 21:20 12 Nov 2017
Monmouth, over the 6 or so years I've read this site, I've always found your posts most insightful.
I've not once today said that I'm in full agreement with the trust or the statement which was issued.
I believe that there are several members doing a very hard job fighting against the tide, as Matt alluded to and to tar each one with the same brush as those who sit mutely at forums and don't interact with the fan base at all is wholly unfair.
This site is a witch hunt at times and those who get it in the neck are the ones who interact, a change is needed at board level but the apathy faced by those who are fighting for it is unfathomable. [Post edited 12 Nov 2017 21:39]
|
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 20:54 12 Nov 2017
A Welsh swan? You mean "swan in Welsh" right? Not sure the swans in this kingdom are allowed nationalities, I could be wrong.
I'm motivated by the Trust because I believe you can do more from the inside than the outside. I'm not saying the trust is perfect. Especially not at the moment. I do believe that it's uncalled for singling out people for decisions made by a democratic board. It's like laying the blame for Brexit at your door. |
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 20:40 12 Nov 2017
I think that it's a bit rich that certain people from the trust are singled out when the majority won't face public scrutiny. Just my personal opinion.
I believe in the trust. The initial aim that is. That subject motivates me to post. I just can't find it in me to contribute to how rubbish we are this season. |
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 20:27 12 Nov 2017
I am nobody's stooge.
I don't come on this site often and post even less frequently.
Work, home, partner & 3 kids afford me very little time to do so. I chose to pipe up tonight. Shoot me. |
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 20:19 12 Nov 2017
Are we really doing this again?
Unless you or I were party to the discussions we could have no way of knowing what advice was taken.
Unless, of course, you know something we don't. |
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 20:16 12 Nov 2017
I do actually. What makes you think I'm a no mark lurker in the cowardly bushes?
Because I called you out? Disagreed with you?
Is no one entitled to an opinion unless it's the same as yours? Considering what's going on with Matt's resignation from the Trust board, surely what's needed is more opinions, not people being shouted down because they believe differently. |
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 20:09 12 Nov 2017
No Lisa, I was disagreeing with your view.
I read your points and gave my reasons for disagreeing with them. If I discredited them then I achieved more than I set out to. [Post edited 12 Nov 2017 20:11]
|
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 19:58 12 Nov 2017
If by "singled Lisa out" you mean disagreed with some of the things she said, yup, that was me.
If by "everyone" you mean one person, Murph, I believe, well you've got me again.
Am I on the Trust board, nope. Though I doubt there are any left who are willing to enter into online discussions with the fans.
I stand by the belly tickling comment too. You loved it, that much was obvious. |
| Forum
Reply | Genuine question - from a Trust Member
at 18:57 12 Nov 2017
I'm sure that the irony of this post is not lost on many.
Remind us again of the time you "had the balls" to stand as a board member... You prefer having your belly tickled by Dineen... |
| Forum
Reply | FAO Lisa
at 00:19 19 Aug 2017
You think you're a fan. Yup. Ok. |
| Forum
Reply | FAO Lisa
at 00:08 19 Aug 2017
Thank you. Appreciate your input. You must like cats [Post edited 19 Aug 2017 0:10]
|
| Forum
Reply | FAO Lisa
at 23:56 18 Aug 2017
From your posts you seem like a dick. Ain't real life wonderful. You MASSIVE TVVAT |
| Forum
Reply | FAO Lisa
at 23:37 18 Aug 2017
How's about you read my posts and then judge. |
| Forum
Reply | FAO Lisa
at 23:20 18 Aug 2017
I'm sure we will |
| Forum
Reply | FAO Lisa
at 23:15 18 Aug 2017
Maybe the points which were made were either a) in hand or b) irrelevant. |
| | Alarch
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 9 | | Comment Votes: | 0 | | Prediction League: | 0 | | TOTAL: | 9 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
