Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Southampton 09:33 - Sep 16 with 2420 viewsPlankton

We tried to tell you
0
Southampton on 09:36 - Sep 16 with 2400 viewsonehunglow

It really is time to move on though it’s hard looking at what this individual did and is doing .
We were taken in,as have been Soton.

Fin

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
Southampton on 09:52 - Sep 16 with 2372 viewsKeithHaynes

Southampton on 09:36 - Sep 16 by onehunglow

It really is time to move on though it’s hard looking at what this individual did and is doing .
We were taken in,as have been Soton.

Fin


It’s easy to to say we, when you mean you.

A great believer in taking anything you like to wherever you want to.
Blog: Do you want to start a career in journalism ?

0
Southampton on 10:23 - Sep 16 with 2318 viewsKeithHaynes

Bearing in mind they are seventh with three wins from six. More entitled premier league fans.

A great believer in taking anything you like to wherever you want to.
Blog: Do you want to start a career in journalism ?

0
Southampton on 11:15 - Sep 16 with 2269 viewsJACKMANANDBOY

At risk of stating the obvious, the resources and expectation associated with a relegated Premier League team means Martin won't be able to repeat the pattern of results he delivered at MK Don's and with us.

Besian Idrizaj Forever a Jack
Poll: When will Duff Revert to 4 at the Back

0
Southampton on 12:00 - Sep 16 with 2195 viewsonehunglow

Southampton on 09:52 - Sep 16 by KeithHaynes

It’s easy to to say we, when you mean you.


It’s just grammatical nuances Keith.
I could have used “one” or indeed “ you” ( vous” but I try to keep it tidy
Put it this way,many were taken in.
There ya go.

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
Southampton on 13:26 - Sep 16 with 2106 viewsReslovenSwan1

Southampton on 12:00 - Sep 16 by onehunglow

It’s just grammatical nuances Keith.
I could have used “one” or indeed “ you” ( vous” but I try to keep it tidy
Put it this way,many were taken in.
There ya go.


I never feel comfortable saying "we" because I am not an owner of Swansea city. Members of the Trust can say this as they notionally own 11% of the club. The members are at fault for not auditing their leadership in the period 2014-2022. Their strategy was 'bonkers'. The members were passive due to a lack of self confidence perhaps?

I have a gripe with Martin as he jumped ship. He is now telling SFC that he needs time. At Swansea he was given a lot of time and seemed to be improving very slowly. Perhaps he needed another season. If he believes his own principles he would have rejected SFC and continued his holy quest.

Duff has the potential to prove to the US owners he is better by finishing higher than Martin this season.

Marti was alway looking for "big transfer windows". His problem was defence and he had his players in place. Fisher , Sorinola, Wood, Darling plus Cabango he helped bring through. The january "catastrophe" was a diversion away from Martin players performing badly.
[Post edited 16 Sep 2023 14:04]

Wise sage since Toshack era
Poll: Will Cabango and Darling sign new contracts?

0
Southampton on 13:30 - Sep 16 with 2101 viewsJACKMANANDBOY

Southampton on 09:52 - Sep 16 by KeithHaynes

It’s easy to to say we, when you mean you.


The poster is a member of the Royal Family.

I think poster meant to say we as one would say I rather than you when he meant me.
[Post edited 16 Sep 2023 13:34]

Besian Idrizaj Forever a Jack
Poll: When will Duff Revert to 4 at the Back

0
Southampton on 14:10 - Sep 16 with 2015 viewsonehunglow

Southampton on 13:26 - Sep 16 by ReslovenSwan1

I never feel comfortable saying "we" because I am not an owner of Swansea city. Members of the Trust can say this as they notionally own 11% of the club. The members are at fault for not auditing their leadership in the period 2014-2022. Their strategy was 'bonkers'. The members were passive due to a lack of self confidence perhaps?

I have a gripe with Martin as he jumped ship. He is now telling SFC that he needs time. At Swansea he was given a lot of time and seemed to be improving very slowly. Perhaps he needed another season. If he believes his own principles he would have rejected SFC and continued his holy quest.

Duff has the potential to prove to the US owners he is better by finishing higher than Martin this season.

Marti was alway looking for "big transfer windows". His problem was defence and he had his players in place. Fisher , Sorinola, Wood, Darling plus Cabango he helped bring through. The january "catastrophe" was a diversion away from Martin players performing badly.
[Post edited 16 Sep 2023 14:04]


The “ we” is surely a generic term for a fan base ,not individuals .

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
Login to get fewer ads

Southampton on 14:19 - Sep 16 with 2009 viewsSullutaCreturned

Southampton on 09:52 - Sep 16 by KeithHaynes

It’s easy to to say we, when you mean you.


He can't mean himelf when from the very beginning he was against him!

In fact he got pelters for not giving him any chance from the beginning.

Southampton fans are obviously a touch more reactive than us but guess what, to heck with them and Russell Martin. If he ruins them he's just doing us a favour.
0
Southampton on 14:25 - Sep 16 with 1985 viewsonehunglow

Southampton on 14:19 - Sep 16 by SullutaCreturned

He can't mean himelf when from the very beginning he was against him!

In fact he got pelters for not giving him any chance from the beginning.

Southampton fans are obviously a touch more reactive than us but guess what, to heck with them and Russell Martin. If he ruins them he's just doing us a favour.


One man’s pelters ….!
Nobody likes to be proven wrong after trusting.
It’s horrible .

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
Southampton on 18:38 - Sep 16 with 1854 viewslifelong

Southampton on 14:19 - Sep 16 by SullutaCreturned

He can't mean himelf when from the very beginning he was against him!

In fact he got pelters for not giving him any chance from the beginning.

Southampton fans are obviously a touch more reactive than us but guess what, to heck with them and Russell Martin. If he ruins them he's just doing us a favour.


He’ll keep on about it for the next 5 years.
0
Southampton on 20:01 - Sep 16 with 1767 viewsonehunglow

Southampton on 18:38 - Sep 16 by lifelong

He’ll keep on about it for the next 5 years.


I’d be happy to still be with us for five years
Assume nothing boys ,nothing.
It’s only opinions
Nobody is going to war
Got that

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
Southampton on 05:53 - Sep 17 with 1544 viewsjack247

Wish Barnsley had told us
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024