| Kingsley 20:37 - Aug 17 with 2333 views | swan65split |
The more I see him, the more I wonder why we let him leave.
|  | | |  |
| Kingsley on 20:42 - Aug 17 with 2312 views | max936 |
Decent player when he was here and has improved since. |  |
| |
| Kingsley on 21:13 - Aug 17 with 2240 views | KeithHaynes |
He was at the swans when we had a plethora of superb players in the premier league, he didn’t do that well on one loan as well if I recall at Crewe ? We got a decent fee for him. There were quite a few others around the same time who have gone on to have decent careers. |  |
| |
| Kingsley on 01:09 - Aug 18 with 2055 views | nyc_swans |
he made one really good cross that people remember |  | | |
| Kingsley on 06:13 - Aug 18 with 2012 views | angryjack |
| Kingsley on 01:09 - Aug 18 by nyc_swans |
he made one really good cross that people remember |
West ham |  | | |
| Kingsley on 08:30 - Aug 18 with 1890 views | RichardO |
We didn't have a another left back at the time and someone thought it was a good idea to shoehorn the incoming midfielder Clucas into the the defence. So not only did we not use Clucas in the position we bought him for, we also threw in as part of the deal a young promising player that we needed who could surely have done better than Clucas at left back.
One of the dumbest tranfer deals ever! | | | |
| Kingsley on 11:28 - Aug 18 with 1786 views | KeithHaynes |
| Kingsley on 08:30 - Aug 18 by RichardO |
We didn't have a another left back at the time and someone thought it was a good idea to shoehorn the incoming midfielder Clucas into the the defence. So not only did we not use Clucas in the position we bought him for, we also threw in as part of the deal a young promising player that we needed who could surely have done better than Clucas at left back.
One of the dumbest tranfer deals ever! |
Martin Olsson was the main reason Kingsley found it difficult to break in to the first team. Clucas had to be played, he would have been in goal if he was all we had, especially at that price.
This post has been edited by an administrator | |
| |
| Kingsley on 12:52 - Aug 18 with 1715 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Kingsley on 11:28 - Aug 18 by KeithHaynes |
Martin Olsson was the main reason Kingsley found it difficult to break in to the first team. Clucas had to be played, he would have been in goal if he was all we had, especially at that price.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
Clucas in goal, you may be onto something there!
😉 |  |
| |
| Kingsley on 15:52 - Aug 18 with 1619 views | RichardO |
| Kingsley on 11:28 - Aug 18 by KeithHaynes |
Martin Olsson was the main reason Kingsley found it difficult to break in to the first team. Clucas had to be played, he would have been in goal if he was all we had, especially at that price.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
Olsson did have minor injury problems before we got rid of Kingsley so maybe it was a bit short sighted given as I remember it Olsson injury issues got worst which wasn't surprising given the role he played, for me he wasn't used correctly maybe Kingsly was considered too young and inexperienced to be adequate cover but then again who else did we have? [Post edited 18 Aug 2023 18:46]
| | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Kingsley on 16:00 - Aug 18 with 1606 views | swan65split |
| Kingsley on 20:42 - Aug 17 by max936 |
Decent player when he was here and has improved since. |
At the time I thought that Kingsley was the better player between him and Jay, though fair doos both have done wonders.
i still see it as our loss. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
