| WAC on 12:38 - May 24 with 925 views | JaySaint |
| WAC on 12:37 - May 24 by Sadoldgit |
In a few months? Really? From what I have read it is highly unlikely that we will teach a deal by the current deadline. Where are you getting your information from? |
The news |  |
|  |
| WAC on 12:44 - May 24 with 913 views | Sadoldgit |
| WAC on 12:38 - May 24 by JaySaint |
The news |
I watch the news too. They say on the news I watch that talks aren’t going well. Some are saying that the deadline needs to be extended because they won’t be able to reach a deal by the current deadline. I don’t know where you are getting your news from but I have not heard anyone saying that it will be done and dusted in a few months. |  | | |
| WAC on 12:46 - May 24 with 913 views | JaySaint |
| WAC on 12:44 - May 24 by Sadoldgit |
I watch the news too. They say on the news I watch that talks aren’t going well. Some are saying that the deadline needs to be extended because they won’t be able to reach a deal by the current deadline. I don’t know where you are getting your news from but I have not heard anyone saying that it will be done and dusted in a few months. |
the govts position is that it will be done either way by the end of the year.
everything else is pure speculation | |
| |
| WAC on 12:53 - May 24 with 896 views | Sadoldgit |
A poll in the Swindon Advertiser says that 81% of the votes say yes, he should resign and only 18% says he shouldn’t. We can all play this game. | | | |
| WAC on 13:15 - May 24 with 888 views | kentsouthampton |
| WAC on 12:53 - May 24 by Sadoldgit |
A poll in the Swindon Advertiser says that 81% of the votes say yes, he should resign and only 18% says he shouldn’t. We can all play this game. |
Labour won't want him sacked, he's a recruitment poster boy for them. |  | | |
| WAC on 13:15 - May 24 with 878 views | Sadoldgit |
| WAC on 13:15 - May 24 by kentsouthampton |
Labour won't want him sacked, he's a recruitment poster boy for them. |
Good point! | | | |
| WAC on 13:21 - May 24 with 874 views | DorsetIan |
| WAC on 10:23 - May 24 by Boris_ |
The hysteria about Cummings is tedious. Are people really as 'livid' as they are making out? Or perhaps it's just people crying about a Tory government and Brexit again? Absolutely mental. |
The people who are “livid” are the one who have done as the govt instructed and stayed at home, while elderly loved ones died alone in other parts of the country, or where they too could have made their lives easier by moving nearer to family helpers.
None of this has happened to me, so I’m not livid. I just find it amazing that this guy is so bulletproof that this rag bag government is prepared to throw common sense and decency to the wind to defend him.
Look at the way he dressed - he clearly does not believe that normal rules and conventions apply to him. Fine - I hate conformity for the sake of it - but don’t adopt an ‘I can do what the f*ck I want’ attitude when you’re part of a govt which is already failing miserably to lead the nation through very very difficult times, and expect to stay in your job when you’re caught out.
Not one iota of contrition from Cummings. No acknowledgement that others might find what he has done disappointing. And, of course, he’s got no constituents, so he’s only accountable to Boris and the sycophant cabinet ministers, all of whom dare not cross him in case he stays in post.
My only dilemma is that if he goes, Priti Patel is probably safer for longer... | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| WAC on 14:43 - May 24 with 848 views | Sadoldgit |
| WAC on 11:17 - May 24 by kentsouthampton |
Johnson is desperate to keep him because he knows where all the bodies are buried. |
Cummings is married to the Editor of The Spectator. There is a story doing the rounds that Johnson drunkenly exposed himself to her before she married Cummings. Also Johnson’s fiancée used to be with Harry Cole, the hack who does the smear pieces on Starmer for the Daily Mail. George Orwell would love this. | | | |
| WAC on 15:57 - May 24 with 817 views | saint22 |
| WAC on 14:43 - May 24 by Sadoldgit |
Cummings is married to the Editor of The Spectator. There is a story doing the rounds that Johnson drunkenly exposed himself to her before she married Cummings. Also Johnson’s fiancée used to be with Harry Cole, the hack who does the smear pieces on Starmer for the Daily Mail. George Orwell would love this. |
It’s like the Rebekah brooks / cameron show all over again
Odious bunch of self serving tools | | | |
| WAC on 15:59 - May 24 with 811 views | kentsouthampton |
[Post edited 24 May 2020 16:01]
| | | |
| WAC on 10:34 - May 25 with 707 views | Boris_ |
It’s not the same thing though, is it? |  |
| |
| WAC on 10:36 - May 25 with 706 views | JaySaint |
literally 2 weeks ago, so many were complaining how confusing the rules are/were
now, the rules are/were crystal clear | |
| |
| WAC on 11:32 - May 25 with 690 views | Sadoldgit |
| WAC on 10:36 - May 25 by JaySaint |
literally 2 weeks ago, so many were complaining how confusing the rules are/were
now, the rules are/were crystal clear |
According to you they were/are. Clearly us non Tories didn’t realise that there was “wiggle room” on interpretation for important people. | | | |
| WAC on 11:43 - May 25 with 678 views | DorsetIan |
| WAC on 10:36 - May 25 by JaySaint |
literally 2 weeks ago, so many were complaining how confusing the rules are/were
now, the rules are/were crystal clear |
The unclear rules were the later, coming out of lockdown, ones.
They were contrasted with the earlier ‘stay home’ messaging which was very clear.
Stay...at...home...
Not:
Drive...to....Durham... | |
| |
| WAC on 11:44 - May 25 with 677 views | JaySaint |
| WAC on 11:32 - May 25 by Sadoldgit |
According to you they were/are. Clearly us non Tories didn’t realise that there was “wiggle room” on interpretation for important people. |
they are clear, it was not me who was complaining that they could not be understood | |
| |
| WAC on 11:59 - May 25 with 666 views | cocklebreath |
| WAC on 10:34 - May 25 by Boris_ |
It’s not the same thing though, is it? |
Suprise suprise here’s Russell to back the odious fooker |  |
| |
| WAC on 11:59 - May 25 with 666 views | saint22 |
| WAC on 11:44 - May 25 by JaySaint |
they are clear, it was not me who was complaining that they could not be understood |
Well Dumbinic didn’t understand the clear rules either dud he? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
