| Coincidence?? 10:44 - Dec 6 with 1610 views | Beaker |
Since Beattie became attacking coach we have been shite up front. Bloody hell, he couldn't even manage Accrington Stanley !! Jobs for the boys me thinks |  | | |  |
| Coincidence?? on 11:08 - Dec 6 with 1569 views | Dan_Swan |
We scored 10 goals in the opening 5 games conceding 4. Since then in 12 games Scored 7 whilst conceding 19.
Beattie is just a scapegoat, We've not played well in months. |  |
| Still following Dr's orders! |
| |
| Coincidence?? on 11:17 - Dec 6 with 1524 views | jack247 |
Very few people on here know how good or bad Beattie is, same goes for all of the management team. | | | |
| Coincidence?? on 11:20 - Dec 6 with 1514 views | perchrockjack |
The results of his work are on the pitch.
They re not good | |
| |
| Coincidence?? on 11:28 - Dec 6 with 1466 views | jack247 |
| Coincidence?? on 11:20 - Dec 6 by perchrockjack |
The results of his work are on the pitch.
They re not good |
That's the results of the management team as a wholes work. I'm not saying Beattie plays a massive or tiny role in it, I just don't know. I very much doubt anyone else on here does either.
I'd expect them all to be handed their p45 before too long regardless. | | | |
| Coincidence?? on 11:30 - Dec 6 with 1461 views | Dan_Swan |
| Coincidence?? on 11:20 - Dec 6 by perchrockjack |
The results of his work are on the pitch.
They re not good |
Same can be said for the whole management team, I just think singling him out is unfair  | |
| Still following Dr's orders! |
| |
| Coincidence?? on 12:14 - Dec 6 with 1384 views | Flashberryjack |
So let me get this straight.......we employ an attacking coach to, well, make us attack better.
He fails miserably to improve that part of our game, in fact makes it even worst.
Maybe it's just me, but I would have thought that any criticism leveled at Beattie would be well and truly justified, when considering how f*cking awful we've been up front. |  |
| |
| Coincidence?? on 12:18 - Dec 6 with 1357 views | Dan_Swan |
| Coincidence?? on 12:14 - Dec 6 by Flashberryjack |
So let me get this straight.......we employ an attacking coach to, well, make us attack better.
He fails miserably to improve that part of our game, in fact makes it even worst.
Maybe it's just me, but I would have thought that any criticism leveled at Beattie would be well and truly justified, when considering how f*cking awful we've been up front. |
We've been just as bad at the back. Blaming one element of the play doesn't make sense | |
| Still following Dr's orders! |
| |
| Coincidence?? on 12:30 - Dec 6 with 1310 views | Flashberryjack |
| Coincidence?? on 12:18 - Dec 6 by Dan_Swan |
We've been just as bad at the back. Blaming one element of the play doesn't make sense |
So would you blame Beattie for that or the defensive/goalkeepers coach? | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Coincidence?? on 12:36 - Dec 6 with 1276 views | giantstoneater |
Just like Cusack before him Monk has brought in a pal to help him out and its failed miserably although can't all be Beatties fault not even Monks but sooner or later the players will have to stand tall and show us why they were so highly regarded by us in the first place. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
