| Communication 19:57 - Dec 30 with 6221 views | WirralDale |
Hi all, as I'm new to the forum (although I read the posts) I wanted to second what another poster mentioned recently.
I have a few ideas about fund raising, though some may have been considered previously and discounted for whatever reason..
I tried to email the Trust twice the other day, but the messages couldn't be delivered and were bounced back. How can we get our ideas across if we're not heard? I could use snail mail I suppose.
I don't make it to many home games anymore, but I do watch on iFollow , despite it being a frustrating experience more often than not!  |  | | |  |
| Communication on 11:13 - Dec 31 with 1351 views | fourfourtwo |
| Communication on 11:00 - Dec 31 by WirralDale |
Thanks. It's a shame my name has caused all this trouble..
My brother was only trying to defend me. I'm a 60 year old woman, don't know Jarvis, certainly wouldn't want anything to do with him.
I was born and brought up in Rochdale, went to Meanwood school and moved nearly 40 years ago. We're fourth (or fifth?) generation Dale fans and took our Dad to a freezing Wembley to watch the Spurs game the year before he died. We had his wake at Spotland.
I'd give you my name but you probably wouldn't recognise it!
Can we draw a line under this?
Up the Dale! |
Apologies for the mix up. There was no need for your brother to start insulting my intelligence when you look at what’s unfolding all across the internet. | | | |
| Communication on 11:29 - Dec 31 with 1299 views | RooleyMoorBlue |
| Communication on 10:29 - Dec 31 by fourfourtwo |
Get a grip FFS.
My original post was aimed at Alexander Jarvis who it looked likely to be. First post, from The Wirral, dig at The Trust.
There has been no abuse or personal insults aimed at your sister. If it is a genuine coincidence and mistake then that’s some coincidence and all it is.
There’s no need to sulk. |
If saying an email was bounced, (something that was mentioned previously) is considered by you to be a dig at the Trust, you are probably too sensitive to be constructive. If "fat weasel face" wasn't aimed at WirralDale why was it in your reply to their post?
You don't even have the decency to apologise and continue to use excuses to back up your actions.
I'm not one to sulk and when someone calls me a pillock after informing others that the poster can be vouched for, it annoys me to say the least.
If every new poster has to justify themselves just to satisfy your paranoia, you will drive people away, which I would have thought defeats the object.
I suggest in future you ask new posters to prove who they say they and see how well it is received.
As far as I'm concerned that is the end of it because you're obviously not man/woman enough to admit you were in the wrong and apologise, despite being given ample opportunity.
Better late than never I suppose. [Post edited 31 Dec 2022 11:31]
|  | | |
| Communication on 11:43 - Dec 31 with 1256 views | James1980 |
Would forum members who are also involved with The Trust object to having that information on a pinned and locked thread? That way if similar situation arose a PM could be sent to one or more of them to pass on to the trust. | |
| |
| Communication on 09:39 - Jan 1 with 943 views | EllGazzell |
 |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
