By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Collaboration with far left activist groups to attempt to peddle a false narrative of widespread sexual assault amongst their political opponents? Its obvious where the bias lies. It’s not brain surgery.
They have bias in all sorts of areas, it's irrefutable (like the right-wing affiliated QT audience organiser who keeps platforming UKIPers).
It's all wrong and should all be stamped out, whichever 'side' the bias is on imo. Some people (edit - not aimed at you) almost seem to want the bias and revel in it though so they can have slanging match over it. All very odd.
Collaboration with far left activist groups to attempt to peddle a false narrative of widespread sexual assault amongst their political opponents? Its obvious where the bias lies. It’s not brain surgery.
As myself and ECB have been banging on about for ages now, you get plenty on the left calling it biased and plenty on the right calling it biased. Just look at QT on Thursdays, also look at how much air time they have given Farage over the years - a man who led a minority party and who failed SEVEN times to get elected. Look at how much airtime Corbyn has been given - probably as equal as that tinpot racist I just mentioned.
As myself and ECB have been banging on about for ages now, you get plenty on the left calling it biased and plenty on the right calling it biased. Just look at QT on Thursdays, also look at how much air time they have given Farage over the years - a man who led a minority party and who failed SEVEN times to get elected. Look at how much airtime Corbyn has been given - probably as equal as that tinpot racist I just mentioned.
It's not rocket science chum.
It's almost as if it's a large organisations staffed by a range of people with different views, influences and connections all scrabbling to get clicks and views in a highly competitive market, isn't it?
As myself and ECB have been banging on about for ages now, you get plenty on the left calling it biased and plenty on the right calling it biased. Just look at QT on Thursdays, also look at how much air time they have given Farage over the years - a man who led a minority party and who failed SEVEN times to get elected. Look at how much airtime Corbyn has been given - probably as equal as that tinpot racist I just mentioned.
It's not rocket science chum.
Are you suggesting minority parties shouldn’t be getting airtime? Especially a minor party that won a national election. That vacuous Leanne has been on plenty of times and there’s always some Liberal Democrat non entity on there.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Are you suggesting minority parties shouldn’t be getting airtime? Especially a minor party that won a national election. That vacuous Leanne has been on plenty of times and there’s always some Liberal Democrat non entity on there.
No I am not, but to suggest a major left wing bias is incorrect and totally crass.
Ebo is a prime example of all that is wrong with the left in the 21st century. People that make the most abhorrent of comnents and see no wrong in it. Comments that are akin to the far right. FACT
The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
So why are they allegedly working closely with a left wing activist group?
So Robinson is being defended on this thread because he hasn't yet been convicted (this time at least) but we should all rush to condemn the BBC when as you say, it's only allegations at this time? Some cognitive dissonance on display there.
I'm also finding it hilarious that Rockin (welcome back by the way), who was once one of our more 'right-wing' posters, is now being painted as some kind of left-wing, MSM brainwashed lemming.
You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help.
Ebo is a prime example of all that is wrong with the left in the 21st century. People that make the most abhorrent of comnents and see no wrong in it. Comments that are akin to the far right. FACT
Gotta agree I'm afraid
When you look at the tactics employed by Hope Not Hate, you'd swear they were the big, nasty extremist organisation they supposedly oppose
Far right and far left have lots in common. They're all c*nts for starters.
So Robinson is being defended on this thread because he hasn't yet been convicted (this time at least) but we should all rush to condemn the BBC when as you say, it's only allegations at this time? Some cognitive dissonance on display there.
I'm also finding it hilarious that Rockin (welcome back by the way), who was once one of our more 'right-wing' posters, is now being painted as some kind of left-wing, MSM brainwashed lemming.
Where have I defended Robinson? If he’a found to have broken the law he should go to prison.
If the BBC were collaborating with the EDL on a documentary falsely contriving to accuse Owen Jones of sexual assault then it would be the same.
The BBC shouldn’t be working closely with political activist groups of either side.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Ebo is a prime example of all that is wrong with the left in the 21st century. People that make the most abhorrent of comnents and see no wrong in it. Comments that are akin to the far right. FACT
Daz you still live in the last century you daft tvvat.
Point out where I made such comment on this thread?
Where have I defended Robinson? If he’a found to have broken the law he should go to prison.
If the BBC were collaborating with the EDL on a documentary falsely contriving to accuse Owen Jones of sexual assault then it would be the same.
The BBC shouldn’t be working closely with political activist groups of either side.
Yeah, you were probably not the right person to quote there. My apologies.
There are others on this thread (Icey in particular) who have rushed to defend Robinson (while claiming they don't care about him) as he hasn't been found guilty of one specific offence, but are happy to jump all over these allegations against the BBC.
I agree with you and Blaze above that the far-right and far-left are equally reprehensible at the moment.
You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help.
When you look at the tactics employed by Hope Not Hate, you'd swear they were the big, nasty extremist organisation they supposedly oppose
Far right and far left have lots in common. They're all c*nts for starters.
So you are assuming I actively support Hope not hate? Fu ck me you are both duller than I thought. Go give your heads a wobble. Because I oppose the right and far right does not make me far left FFS
Yeah, you were probably not the right person to quote there. My apologies.
There are others on this thread (Icey in particular) who have rushed to defend Robinson (while claiming they don't care about him) as he hasn't been found guilty of one specific offence, but are happy to jump all over these allegations against the BBC.
I agree with you and Blaze above that the far-right and far-left are equally reprehensible at the moment.
Totally wrong. Mr half cocked strikes again.
Where have I been happy to jump all over the BBC ? I don't think I've mentioned them in a single post !
My point is purely to highlight that Lennon has a right to voice his opinion and if we are not careful in protecting freedom of thought and speech we will end up in a very dark place indeed .
Like I said in my first comment, you don't really have to agree with what he says but we should respect/defend his right to say what he thinks, in much the same way extreme islamists are protected when shouting vile abuse at dead soldiers families. Can't protect one side without the other, lets protect all and let the facts and the debate draw to a natural conclusion, all simple stuff if willing to look through MSM brain washing.
We have orange man bad, I guess we now have Luton man bad too !!
The allegations Yaxley-Lennon is making here are serious and without foundation. To call someone a paedophile and then go on doorsteps harassing people he disagrees with is asking for trouble.
Stuchbery lies for a living. All you are seeing here is the serve being returned and he doesn’t like it one little bit. One minute Robinson is a “tool of the establishment” the next he’s running to the Police, ‘the establishment,’ because here comes somebody who won’t play the role of cowed victim of their “dirty tricks.”
I don’t know how much you know about H n H or the reasons behind their split from Searchlight, Eb? It’s an amusing tale of the bitter, internecine squabbling of the far left pitting venemous ideologues against would-be gangsters, drug dealers and pederasts, taking in police grasses, MI5 moles, prostituted hacks and debased MPs en route. I’m not entirely sure just yet where Stuchbery sits in this less than starry firmament but he’ll no doubt be there dimly twinkling.
An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it.
So why are they allegedly working closely with a left wing activist group?
Because a lot of the researchers, producers etc... went to Uni with the H n H crowd, drank together at the same Students’ Union bars, went on the same demos, shared bongs together in tents at Glastonbury, caught crabs from the same frightful, hayrick-haired leftie harridan?
Just a thought...
[Post edited 5 Mar 2019 16:04]
An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it.
Where have I been happy to jump all over the BBC ? I don't think I've mentioned them in a single post !
My point is purely to highlight that Lennon has a right to voice his opinion and if we are not careful in protecting freedom of thought and speech we will end up in a very dark place indeed .
Like I said in my first comment, you don't really have to agree with what he says but we should respect/defend his right to say what he thinks, in much the same way extreme islamists are protected when shouting vile abuse at dead soldiers families. Can't protect one side without the other, lets protect all and let the facts and the debate draw to a natural conclusion, all simple stuff if willing to look through MSM brain washing.
We have orange man bad, I guess we now have Luton man bad too !!
You're like a dog with a bone when you get roused by a topic. This is similar to your tantrums about Laudrup leaving.
I am a firm believer in free speech and absolutely Robinson has a right to say whatever he wants. However, he has to face the consequences of what he says if it is deemed to be illegal, hate speech, etc.
If I knew who you were, I could put your name on here and say you were a child molester and should be in jail. I would then have to accept the consequences of saying so if you decided to sue me for libel.
I don't think extreme Islamists should be able to shout abuse at dead soldiers' families without consequences and I don't think extreme right wingers should be allowed to spout hate speech without consequences. The difference is I am perfectly willing to denounce both, but you only venture outside your cave when it's somebody on the right being discussed.
You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help.
Stuchbery lies for a living. All you are seeing here is the serve being returned and he doesn’t like it one little bit. One minute Robinson is a “tool of the establishment” the next he’s running to the Police, ‘the establishment,’ because here comes somebody who won’t play the role of cowed victim of their “dirty tricks.”
I don’t know how much you know about H n H or the reasons behind their split from Searchlight, Eb? It’s an amusing tale of the bitter, internecine squabbling of the far left pitting venemous ideologues against would-be gangsters, drug dealers and pederasts, taking in police grasses, MI5 moles, prostituted hacks and debased MPs en route. I’m not entirely sure just yet where Stuchbery sits in this less than starry firmament but he’ll no doubt be there dimly twinkling.
Ive never said this before, but i like you. I dont always agree with you, but i do appreciate reading your whimsical posts which often come across as well read, insightful and really very mischievous! ;)
Wish i had those levels of subtle tactfulness
"Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper."
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
