| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? 14:47 - Aug 17 with 8558 views | Darran |
Now I know there were several people involved in the sale of the club to the Americans but apparently only one,Huw Jenkins went down the legal route of asking the Trust to rip up the Shareholders Agreement so to keep things simple I'm just going to use Huw Jenkins as the example.
Huw Jenkins verbally asks the Trust to rip up the Shareholders Agreement,then he makes it all official and his solicitor writes to the Trust asking them to rip up the Shareholders Agreement to smoothly push the sale through and the Trust refuses.
Then in the Fans Forum with the two American owners at the Liberty they state in front of everyone that Jenkins told them to keep everything quiet so the Trust wouldn't find out what was going on behind their backs.
So my question is how isn't it a criminal act when a Chairman of a multi-million pound company,any company acts like this?
What am I missing here because it's the one thing I can't get my head around? |  |
| |  |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 17:57 - Aug 17 with 1291 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 17:54 - Aug 17 by Darran |
I'm baffled by it all Lis,I'd have thought there'd have been some kind of code of conduct involved for directors of a multi million pound company. |
There is FFS.
But the party that suffers as a result needs to be willing to bloody do something about it.
The fact that they aren't is why so many people on here today are leaving.
I'm baffled that you can't understand that. |  | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:01 - Aug 17 with 1283 views | Darran |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 17:57 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
There is FFS.
But the party that suffers as a result needs to be willing to bloody do something about it.
The fact that they aren't is why so many people on here today are leaving.
I'm baffled that you can't understand that. |
Don't be rude.
I kind of can now but something is still bugging me. | |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:05 - Aug 17 with 1277 views | jack2jack |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:01 - Aug 17 by Darran |
Don't be rude.
I kind of can now but something is still bugging me. |
The fact that the trust knew nothing of the sale to the Americans perhaps Mmmmm! |  | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:07 - Aug 17 with 1270 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:01 - Aug 17 by Darran |
Don't be rude.
I kind of can now but something is still bugging me. |
I'm not being rude.
You're basically asking why someone gets robbed, but chooses not to report it, and the police don't do anything. | | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:08 - Aug 17 with 1268 views | Meraki |
There's a few more skeletons in the closet to come out I think. | | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:11 - Aug 17 with 1259 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:08 - Aug 17 by Meraki |
There's a few more skeletons in the closet to come out I think. |
The deal includes an agreement to never pursue legal action as a result of what's gone on. Nothing will ever be revealed whether it exists or not. | | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:17 - Aug 17 with 1239 views | Wingstandwood |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 17:57 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
There is FFS.
But the party that suffers as a result needs to be willing to bloody do something about it.
The fact that they aren't is why so many people on here today are leaving.
I'm baffled that you can't understand that. |
I've donated a little over £1,000+ to SCST since it started, was an uber-loyalist, sadly today I've have deceided to leave.
It's a toothless, ineffectual, wimpish 'hand-in-glove' patsy organisation not worth paying even a single Penny for a years membership!.......The utterly shameful Huw Cooze affair (is that traitor-scumbag still drinking down traitor H.Q Morgans?) really put me in the picture, i.e. thats the calibre of some of the (hidden motive(s)/hidden adgenda) self serving scumbag filth and lowlife sh#t that has 'infiltrated' it at times. |  |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:18 - Aug 17 with 1223 views | Flashberryjack |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:11 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
The deal includes an agreement to never pursue legal action as a result of what's gone on. Nothing will ever be revealed whether it exists or not. |
Nail on the head. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:20 - Aug 17 with 1218 views | max936 |
Nobody can yet the Trust still recommended the membership to accept the yanks deal, I wouldn't trust any of them after that. |  |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:20 - Aug 17 with 1215 views | Meraki |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:11 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
The deal includes an agreement to never pursue legal action as a result of what's gone on. Nothing will ever be revealed whether it exists or not. |
Yes, call me a cynic but I think thats why the 'accept the deal' vote was pushed through - everyones dirty laundry stays in the basket. | | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:28 - Aug 17 with 1198 views | longlostjack |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:20 - Aug 17 by Meraki |
Yes, call me a cynic but I think thats why the 'accept the deal' vote was pushed through - everyones dirty laundry stays in the basket. |
I hope that the QC was made aware of ALL of the facts. |  |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:38 - Aug 17 with 1173 views | Darran |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:07 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
I'm not being rude.
You're basically asking why someone gets robbed, but chooses not to report it, and the police don't do anything. |
Ok so are you saying that the only people that could have taken Jenkins to court are the Trust? | |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:40 - Aug 17 with 1167 views | Wingstandwood |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:20 - Aug 17 by max936 |
Nobody can yet the Trust still recommended the membership to accept the yanks deal, I wouldn't trust any of them after that. |
Bang on! And you no doubt know that (I've heard it!) many people are saying and thinking "What have the sell-outs and Yanks got on the Trust" for the Trust to recommend a deal like that in the first place. After all it does rather seem to go against Trust ethos/ideology and very reason for its existence in the first place.
Was there a ‘silver-bullet’ that they (the sell-outs and Yanks) could magically pull out of the hat when required in a courtroom?...... Something to completely destroy the Trusts case and credibility?
Did some people know about the whole torrid affair/sell-out deal all the time but decided to say f#ck all? The Huw Cooze affair alone really looked like major spanner in the works stuff? Too cosy (beyond sane comprehension) hey? Apparently he was betrayed in the most disgusting and disgraceful of ways but still drank in the worst possible place imaginable. [Post edited 17 Aug 2017 18:44]
| |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:40 - Aug 17 with 1164 views | BillyChong |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:17 - Aug 17 by Wingstandwood |
I've donated a little over £1,000+ to SCST since it started, was an uber-loyalist, sadly today I've have deceided to leave.
It's a toothless, ineffectual, wimpish 'hand-in-glove' patsy organisation not worth paying even a single Penny for a years membership!.......The utterly shameful Huw Cooze affair (is that traitor-scumbag still drinking down traitor H.Q Morgans?) really put me in the picture, i.e. thats the calibre of some of the (hidden motive(s)/hidden adgenda) self serving scumbag filth and lowlife sh#t that has 'infiltrated' it at times. |
That once hailed model club as far as fan ownership was concerned is no more | | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:41 - Aug 17 with 1161 views | Neath_Jack |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:38 - Aug 17 by Darran |
Ok so are you saying that the only people that could have taken Jenkins to court are the Trust? |
 |  |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:58 - Aug 17 with 1116 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:38 - Aug 17 by Darran |
Ok so are you saying that the only people that could have taken Jenkins to court are the Trust? |
The Trust, as the party to suffer a loss, are the ones that would need to take any action within their legal right, to be compensated for that loss.
You couldn't take action against someone who's stolen something from someone else could you if the person who was stolen from says 'no, you're all right mate'.
How could anyone else do anything? | | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:07 - Aug 17 with 1085 views | Darran |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:58 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
The Trust, as the party to suffer a loss, are the ones that would need to take any action within their legal right, to be compensated for that loss.
You couldn't take action against someone who's stolen something from someone else could you if the person who was stolen from says 'no, you're all right mate'.
How could anyone else do anything? |
Well that's the bit I can't get my head I'd have thought there'd have been some kind of overseer,some kind of financial ombudsman that would have taken on the criminal side of things that wouldn't have cost the Trust one penny when it went to go court. | |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:08 - Aug 17 with 1078 views | Darran |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:41 - Aug 17 by Neath_Jack |
|
Go bum The Res I'm being serious here. | |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:12 - Aug 17 with 1062 views | Valerie |
Could we have a list of the trust board members names who were desperately arguing for "no legal action" please? | | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:24 - Aug 17 with 1032 views | Oldjack |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 18:58 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
The Trust, as the party to suffer a loss, are the ones that would need to take any action within their legal right, to be compensated for that loss.
You couldn't take action against someone who's stolen something from someone else could you if the person who was stolen from says 'no, you're all right mate'.
How could anyone else do anything? |
Because Darran believes they broke the law by disregarding a legally binding contract and the police should be involved |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:40 - Aug 17 with 1009 views | Darran |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:24 - Aug 17 by Oldjack |
Because Darran believes they broke the law by disregarding a legally binding contract and the police should be involved |
Outstanding post Alan without doubt one of your finest. | |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:43 - Aug 17 with 1002 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:24 - Aug 17 by Oldjack |
Because Darran believes they broke the law by disregarding a legally binding contract and the police should be involved |
As I've already said, the contract breach if there was one is not a criminal matter.
The lack of notice of the change in articles is, technically, but usually remedied by civil action.
The reality is, as with virtually every other matter, the wronged party, have to, you know, REPORT IT! | | | |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:54 - Aug 17 with 985 views | Oldjack |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:43 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
As I've already said, the contract breach if there was one is not a criminal matter.
The lack of notice of the change in articles is, technically, but usually remedied by civil action.
The reality is, as with virtually every other matter, the wronged party, have to, you know, REPORT IT! |
But the Trust have stated it was broken .Even a QC said we had a very strong case , it stinks, The Trust is dead from here on in ,bloody worthless to every JB | |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:59 - Aug 17 with 974 views | Darran |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:43 - Aug 17 by londonlisa2001 |
As I've already said, the contract breach if there was one is not a criminal matter.
The lack of notice of the change in articles is, technically, but usually remedied by civil action.
The reality is, as with virtually every other matter, the wronged party, have to, you know, REPORT IT! |
So if it had been reported could some kind of FSA thingy have taken it on? | |
| |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 20:18 - Aug 17 with 947 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Could someone explain something in laymans terms about the Sellout to me please? on 19:59 - Aug 17 by Darran |
So if it had been reported could some kind of FSA thingy have taken it on? |
The FCA doesn't regulate football clubs Darran.
Then Trust as a shareholder could have applied to the court for permission to bring a claim in the name of the company against the director of the company that they believe acted wrongly. But, as I said, the whole thing would have been pointless as they didn't suffer a loss (as they had too few shares to have stopped the change anyway). They would never have got anywhere.
I'm not being funny, but the way to proceed if you wanted legal remedy was via the legal action that has just been turned down. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
