| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys 17:13 - Aug 30 with 52585 views | Darran |
You know the ones,Warwick,Spratty,T2C.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:35 - Sep 1 with 1565 views | jackonicko |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:31 - Sep 1 by Starsky |
If you think of the Rev Ian paisley's voice when reading that, it's brill. Lol. |
I'd gone for Kelly Maloney. Natch. |  | | |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:36 - Sep 1 with 1561 views | Davillin |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 18:23 - Sep 1 by Spratty |
I note you still don't answer the question. I understand it is an uncomfortable question for you.
Actually I have repeatedly defended both you and PRJ in the past, you even thanked me for it so did PRJ.
Obviously as is your right you looked the other way when Darran has repeatedly abused me and others. I can understand why you might do that.
You do not answer my questions is it OK for a mod to call someone who posts a perfectly polite post a Hideous C*nt? Do you think it is an acceptable example to set. Or the continual racial abuse aimed at some of our overseas fans or the facilitation of ongoing accusations of Child abuse using multiple IDs. This is fact not fiction and I have posted links and copies of ignored abuse complaints as evidence.
Do you think repeatedly accusing someone of child abuse on a public forum is not very serious and vile abuse. Especially when it is actually facilitated by the chief (sic) mod and by extension the site owner.
Although I have made clear in the past I do not support any abuse there are I agree levels and I have little doubt which the Police would take most seriously. I also think it is difficult to be taken seriously complaining about abuse when you are willing to support those that continually give it out, especially those in a position of power.
I do not agree with T2Cs abuse nor yours nor for that matter PRJ's (when he says the most vile things about players and continually accuses people of wanting to look good on the internet when they give their sincerely held views). I am sure none of you really give a Sh1t what I think and that is of course fine.
I think there is also no question that T2C is a passionate supporter of our team and he posts a lot of heartfelt good sense. I would also like to thank him for his kind words about my earlier post.
Defend Darran no way - he is an insidious power monger who it is sad to say behaves in a manner not fitting to be a mod. Did you defend PRJ when Darran followed him to the other site stalking him there and posting terrible things about him on here? It is all about Darran and his inability to remove his ego from the modding of this site. He is setting the gold standard that others must see as acceptable. |
I have had differences of opinion with most, if not all, of the courteous posters on this forum, as well with a half-dozen or dozen of the discourteous ones. Of the latter, I always gave them an open and unbiased reception until they resorted to one of the behaviours that I have repeatedly said are not acceptable to me [see next paragraph]. When they have, I simply put them on ignore. And have taken one or two off and silently let them demonstrate their civility.
I have said many times on here that I enjoy contention in discourse. I do not, however, appreciate insults, foul language as a substitute for reason, and intentional misrepresentation of what I write.
I ask this strictly rhetorical question [in four parts]. Have I ever done any of those things to you? Have you ever done any of them to me? No and no. Are we now in a kind of contentious discussion? Yes. Has it become even remotely rude and insulting? No.
I can honestly say that about virtually all of the posters on this forum -- even when they are directly criticizing something about my post, or about my character. I know that there are some whose language gets too close to the edge of my three concerns, but with other posters and not me. I believe that I have never commented on those posts or posters, nor put any of them on "ignore."
To the specific question you say that I'm not answering.
First, I am not "in an uncomfortable position in the least. " For an explanation, please read on.
Nor would I characterize my answer to you as "looking the other way," because as I wrote above, I restrict my concerns to those who treat me uncivilly. Neither Darran nor Perchrockjack have done so. Nor has either tried to have me banned from the forum in order to have T2C not insult people and use foul language -- or say he won't. They have, in fact, been as civil to me as you have. Candidly, I don't even know whether you have treated some other poster uncivilly, and if you did, I'd not have made an issue of it.
Regarding the "child abuse" matter, I remember fairly clearly that, at the time, I thought the post under consideration was misinterpreted as an accusation of "child abuse" in the usual sense of the words, but, again, it was not my business, nor do I remember who was involved.
It is not even remotely within my remit to give an opinion on whether it is "OK for a mod to call someone who posts a perfectly polite post a Hideous C*nt." If he says that to me, however, I would not appreciate it. If he said it to me one-hundredths as often as T2C has said far worse, I would be more concerned. But it would be in his capacity as "poster," not as "mod." I need to make it clear that my saying that is not in any way a criticism of you or your views on the matter.
Now your last question answered. I remember some disturbance about moving to "the other site," but I must be misremembering who it was. Again, none of it was directed at me, so I did not comment.
Regarding "the gold standard" on this forum, that standard, whatever it was, has since been abandoned. EXCRPT among those whose personal standards still guide them to stay civil and courteous. |  |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:38 - Sep 1 with 1546 views | Spratty |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:04 - Sep 1 by Darran |
Do think calling a Danish poster Bacon Boy is racism Andrew? |
Was a little more than that as I recall bacon snorkling bender springs to mind
Which you seemed rather amused to repeatedly recall as I only mentioned bacon |  | | |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:44 - Sep 1 with 1524 views | perchrockjack |
Vile things about players.fook me that goes back to mark gower days and yeah a shockingly overated player.
Vasquez a disgusting coward.
There we go. All over. And they've gone on to better things while we are here ripping each other to pieces.
It's purely down to T2C.simple.
We can all relate and yeah Darren and you spratty if you put your minds to it,
Chrissy is different gravy.
He s on his own and will destroy this site as he s almost done before.
Depends if you're arsed really..
Fin |  |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:49 - Sep 1 with 1475 views | _ |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:44 - Sep 1 by perchrockjack |
Vile things about players.fook me that goes back to mark gower days and yeah a shockingly overated player.
Vasquez a disgusting coward.
There we go. All over. And they've gone on to better things while we are here ripping each other to pieces.
It's purely down to T2C.simple.
We can all relate and yeah Darren and you spratty if you put your minds to it,
Chrissy is different gravy.
He s on his own and will destroy this site as he s almost done before.
Depends if you're arsed really..
Fin |
Another LAST post?
And another FIN?? |  |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:49 - Sep 1 with 1474 views | _ |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:36 - Sep 1 by Davillin |
I have had differences of opinion with most, if not all, of the courteous posters on this forum, as well with a half-dozen or dozen of the discourteous ones. Of the latter, I always gave them an open and unbiased reception until they resorted to one of the behaviours that I have repeatedly said are not acceptable to me [see next paragraph]. When they have, I simply put them on ignore. And have taken one or two off and silently let them demonstrate their civility.
I have said many times on here that I enjoy contention in discourse. I do not, however, appreciate insults, foul language as a substitute for reason, and intentional misrepresentation of what I write.
I ask this strictly rhetorical question [in four parts]. Have I ever done any of those things to you? Have you ever done any of them to me? No and no. Are we now in a kind of contentious discussion? Yes. Has it become even remotely rude and insulting? No.
I can honestly say that about virtually all of the posters on this forum -- even when they are directly criticizing something about my post, or about my character. I know that there are some whose language gets too close to the edge of my three concerns, but with other posters and not me. I believe that I have never commented on those posts or posters, nor put any of them on "ignore."
To the specific question you say that I'm not answering.
First, I am not "in an uncomfortable position in the least. " For an explanation, please read on.
Nor would I characterize my answer to you as "looking the other way," because as I wrote above, I restrict my concerns to those who treat me uncivilly. Neither Darran nor Perchrockjack have done so. Nor has either tried to have me banned from the forum in order to have T2C not insult people and use foul language -- or say he won't. They have, in fact, been as civil to me as you have. Candidly, I don't even know whether you have treated some other poster uncivilly, and if you did, I'd not have made an issue of it.
Regarding the "child abuse" matter, I remember fairly clearly that, at the time, I thought the post under consideration was misinterpreted as an accusation of "child abuse" in the usual sense of the words, but, again, it was not my business, nor do I remember who was involved.
It is not even remotely within my remit to give an opinion on whether it is "OK for a mod to call someone who posts a perfectly polite post a Hideous C*nt." If he says that to me, however, I would not appreciate it. If he said it to me one-hundredths as often as T2C has said far worse, I would be more concerned. But it would be in his capacity as "poster," not as "mod." I need to make it clear that my saying that is not in any way a criticism of you or your views on the matter.
Now your last question answered. I remember some disturbance about moving to "the other site," but I must be misremembering who it was. Again, none of it was directed at me, so I did not comment.
Regarding "the gold standard" on this forum, that standard, whatever it was, has since been abandoned. EXCRPT among those whose personal standards still guide them to stay civil and courteous. |
Do you realise how much you talk about yourself?
Is this insecurity? | |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:53 - Sep 1 with 1454 views | perchrockjack |
Starsky spratty. In tandem. I'm fecked | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:59 - Sep 1 with 1430 views | Starsky |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:53 - Sep 1 by perchrockjack |
Starsky spratty. In tandem. I'm fecked |
It's easy to remember Starsky. I'm the one that likes the Swans and Spratty is the one that likes Laudrup. |  |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:06 - Sep 1 with 1412 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 15:16 - Sep 1 by Darran |
Yeah you have you've done it to many and many of them think you're a pr-ck for trying to ruin Phils site.
Run along now. |
To be fair Darran you started this thread to ridicule people who have a different point of view to others. A bit rich for you to be playing the "you're trying to ruin Phil's site !" card now.
And Baker is dead right, you've done more to damage the site than anything he's ever done. You started this stupid and pointless thread and should have quit while you were ahead but you wouldn't let it lie would you! |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:13 - Sep 1 with 1388 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 16:27 - Sep 1 by Davillin |
You are truly the thickwit of this board!
ATTENTION Mr Sumbler! There's another example of " The Second Ejaculation" inserting another gratuitous insult -- a string of insults -- into a thread where I have not made a single post heretofore.
There will be no peace -- or cumulative intelligence and good manners -- until you ban his sorry ass. Don't blame me, or Perch, or Darran, because he told you essentially the same thing on another thread.
He is a poison, a virus, an infection, a cancer killing this forum. You're the oncologist. Start excising, please, before the patient dies. You'll find it in his frontal lobe [if that hasn't already been removed, as the symptoms appear to suggest]. |
Shame on you. You've just done worse than T2C ever did. No one is poisonous or deserves ridicule for having differing opinion . If you want to get to the root cause of this go straight to the OP. | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:14 - Sep 1 with 1385 views | Spratty |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:43 - Sep 1 by Starsky |
I'm avoiding your last sentence. A poor attempt to deflect me away From you not understanding what sarcasm means.
You did it ever so subtely, sarcasm nevertheless.
I stand by what I said. Veiled praise = sarcasm lite. [Post edited 1 Sep 2014 19:43]
|
Subtlety is the art of sarcasm
Subtlety is not my thing. Where did I offend the Board? If you are making accusations lets see them, outside of your agendum against me.
I was quite clear in what I said and totally honest in all of it.
No one could have been more delighted than me at our series of wins and if we win the next game I will be thrilled 5 wins out of 5 will be outstanding and we know we are capable of beating Chelsea because we have done it before.
Ah I see giving credit for defeating Chelsea at theirs previously is like crediting Laudrup with it and we want to espunge anything good that happened under or previous manager or it might make the Board look bad for getting rid of him let alone in such a sh1t way.
Now that is what I call and agenda. Sorry not playing that game.
Have you spoken to anyone about your need to control other people or your need to define a supporter as only someone who meets your rather narrow definition. I support a club not individuals or the old boys network.
You it seems support blatant abuse | | | |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:14 - Sep 1 with 1384 views | Darran |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:06 - Sep 1 by Brynmill_Jack |
To be fair Darran you started this thread to ridicule people who have a different point of view to others. A bit rich for you to be playing the "you're trying to ruin Phil's site !" card now.
And Baker is dead right, you've done more to damage the site than anything he's ever done. You started this stupid and pointless thread and should have quit while you were ahead but you wouldn't let it lie would you! |
You haven't got a clue Stephen. | |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:20 - Sep 1 with 1367 views | Starsky |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:14 - Sep 1 by Spratty |
Subtlety is the art of sarcasm
Subtlety is not my thing. Where did I offend the Board? If you are making accusations lets see them, outside of your agendum against me.
I was quite clear in what I said and totally honest in all of it.
No one could have been more delighted than me at our series of wins and if we win the next game I will be thrilled 5 wins out of 5 will be outstanding and we know we are capable of beating Chelsea because we have done it before.
Ah I see giving credit for defeating Chelsea at theirs previously is like crediting Laudrup with it and we want to espunge anything good that happened under or previous manager or it might make the Board look bad for getting rid of him let alone in such a sh1t way.
Now that is what I call and agenda. Sorry not playing that game.
Have you spoken to anyone about your need to control other people or your need to define a supporter as only someone who meets your rather narrow definition. I support a club not individuals or the old boys network.
You it seems support blatant abuse |
"I support blatant abuse?"
I'm having a football debate with you. Where in my posts does it say I support blatant abuse? | |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:25 - Sep 1 with 1345 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:14 - Sep 1 by Darran |
You haven't got a clue Stephen. |
Looks like you can't spell my name. As well as your own | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:25 - Sep 1 with 1342 views | Davillin |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:13 - Sep 1 by Brynmill_Jack |
Shame on you. You've just done worse than T2C ever did. No one is poisonous or deserves ridicule for having differing opinion . If you want to get to the root cause of this go straight to the OP. |
Now that has to be the most ill-informed condemnation of me yet -- and the competition for that honour is fierce. [Is that doing "worse than T2C"?]
This is a classic, too: "No one is poisonous or deserves ridicule for having differing opinion." I have never challenged T2E's "differing opinion" -- just his foul-mouthed insults.
And if "No one is poisonous or deserves ridicule for having differing opinion," then why aren't you casting "shame" on T2E, who does worse to me for less -- for being a hateful "Yank" and being more intelligent and more educated than he is, with the combination being more than he can bear, and starts his lip quivering in hatred?
Your bias is showing. | |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:26 - Sep 1 with 1336 views | Darran |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:25 - Sep 1 by Brynmill_Jack |
Looks like you can't spell my name. As well as your own |
Sorry Steven. | |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:29 - Sep 1 with 1319 views | _ |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:25 - Sep 1 by Davillin |
Now that has to be the most ill-informed condemnation of me yet -- and the competition for that honour is fierce. [Is that doing "worse than T2C"?]
This is a classic, too: "No one is poisonous or deserves ridicule for having differing opinion." I have never challenged T2E's "differing opinion" -- just his foul-mouthed insults.
And if "No one is poisonous or deserves ridicule for having differing opinion," then why aren't you casting "shame" on T2E, who does worse to me for less -- for being a hateful "Yank" and being more intelligent and more educated than he is, with the combination being more than he can bear, and starts his lip quivering in hatred?
Your bias is showing. |
Another post about me??????
*shock*
 | |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:30 - Sep 1 with 1322 views | perchrockjack |
Bryn.
I believe someone has hacked your account.
You are decent minded and I'm certain have a soul.
This all started with T2C being unable to cope with posters disagreeing with him.he has escalated this and I'm told he gets off on it so no sympathy. | |
| |
| Let's all laugh at theAgenda Boys on 20:33 - Sep 1 with 1311 views | Spratty |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:20 - Sep 1 by Starsky |
"I support blatant abuse?"
I'm having a football debate with you. Where in my posts does it say I support blatant abuse? |
It is certainly not a football debate you are having with me though is it
It is a deflection from Darrans abuse which you refuse to comment on whist once again having a go at me for a perfectly reasonable polite and positive post that had the temerity to adhere to the espunge anything good Laudrup was involved in agenda. | | | |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:34 - Sep 1 with 1304 views | _ |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:30 - Sep 1 by perchrockjack |
Bryn.
I believe someone has hacked your account.
You are decent minded and I'm certain have a soul.
This all started with T2C being unable to cope with posters disagreeing with him.he has escalated this and I'm told he gets off on it so no sympathy. |
Another post about me????
*shock*
I'd say this is not just bullying - this is a personal vendetta!! | |
| |
| Let's all laugh at theAgenda Boys on 20:37 - Sep 1 with 1292 views | Starsky |
| Let's all laugh at theAgenda Boys on 20:33 - Sep 1 by Spratty |
It is certainly not a football debate you are having with me though is it
It is a deflection from Darrans abuse which you refuse to comment on whist once again having a go at me for a perfectly reasonable polite and positive post that had the temerity to adhere to the espunge anything good Laudrup was involved in agenda. |
Did you just accuse me of deflecting from Darran's "abuse" by having a football debate?
 | |
| It's just the internet, init. |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:38 - Sep 1 with 1286 views | lifelong |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 19:44 - Sep 1 by perchrockjack |
Vile things about players.fook me that goes back to mark gower days and yeah a shockingly overated player.
Vasquez a disgusting coward.
There we go. All over. And they've gone on to better things while we are here ripping each other to pieces.
It's purely down to T2C.simple.
We can all relate and yeah Darren and you spratty if you put your minds to it,
Chrissy is different gravy.
He s on his own and will destroy this site as he s almost done before.
Depends if you're arsed really..
Fin |
Hey,
Leave Mark Gower out of this.  |  | | |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:40 - Sep 1 with 1278 views | perchrockjack |
Lol
Well I didn't start it rog.
I was harsh
And regret not a word but vile.
Vasquez would have come under that heading though.
Main thing is look at how our board and monk have replaced that deafwood | |
| |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:42 - Sep 1 with 1270 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Let's all laugh at the Agenda Boys on 20:25 - Sep 1 by Davillin |
Now that has to be the most ill-informed condemnation of me yet -- and the competition for that honour is fierce. [Is that doing "worse than T2C"?]
This is a classic, too: "No one is poisonous or deserves ridicule for having differing opinion." I have never challenged T2E's "differing opinion" -- just his foul-mouthed insults.
And if "No one is poisonous or deserves ridicule for having differing opinion," then why aren't you casting "shame" on T2E, who does worse to me for less -- for being a hateful "Yank" and being more intelligent and more educated than he is, with the combination being more than he can bear, and starts his lip quivering in hatred?
Your bias is showing. |
No bias. We agenda boys have to stick together. Just like you three amigos.
What I won't have is anyone implying I want my team to fail just because I think some things at the club could have been done differently. Especially coming from Darran who has a position of some authority on here . Unfortunately his ego has caused him to abuse his power on here in an almost Stalinistic way and it's all to see in this thread.
Do you condone him hoping another poster gets put in hospital and putting it in writing for all to see? I sincerely hope not. | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
