Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed 11:06 - Jan 2 with 2192 views | queensparker | Excellent news - happy new year! | | | | |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:10 - Jan 2 with 2160 views | BrianMcCarthy | The piece mentions agreements and partnering, failing to mention planning permission, but I read that as planning confirmed. Does everyone else? edit:- " meaning planning permission for the club’s new training complex can now be issued." Not "has been issued" but "can now be issued". The Facbook headline is "Planning Permission Issued" so slight confusion. Sorry for being pedantic but is anyone up to date with current English Planningspeak? [Post edited 2 Jan 2014 11:14]
| |
| |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:23 - Jan 2 with 2092 views | secretranger | Essentially what this means is that the legal agreement that accompanies the planning permisson (section 106 agreement) has been signed meaning that planning permission is now in place. Before that we only had a 'resolution to grant planning permission' subject to the signing of the S106. I believe that the legal challenge is a separate issue which relates to the transfer of the land and still needs to be resolved. | | | |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:24 - Jan 2 with 2085 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:23 - Jan 2 by secretranger | Essentially what this means is that the legal agreement that accompanies the planning permisson (section 106 agreement) has been signed meaning that planning permission is now in place. Before that we only had a 'resolution to grant planning permission' subject to the signing of the S106. I believe that the legal challenge is a separate issue which relates to the transfer of the land and still needs to be resolved. |
Thanks secretranger, Is is still possible for the legal challenge to derail the planning and construction, do you know? | |
| |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:24 - Jan 2 with 2082 views | hoopstilidie | Don't like to say "told you so" but, well, you get where I'm going with that one. | |
| |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:26 - Jan 2 with 2073 views | Gloucs_R | The club aims to bring the new facilities into use in 2016. Followed by a new stadium in 2017/18 | |
| |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:31 - Jan 2 with 2038 views | secretranger | My understanding is that if the legal challenge is successful, Ealing Council would have to go through the bidding process for the sale of the land again. The challenge alleges that the land was 'gifted' to QPR. The council has to show that it went through the due process for the disposal of public sector land. I dont know if this legally prevents QPR from starting construction but I would assume that it would be foolish to do so until it is known that the land is 100% QPR's. | | | |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:38 - Jan 2 with 1996 views | tooting_hoop |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:10 - Jan 2 by BrianMcCarthy | The piece mentions agreements and partnering, failing to mention planning permission, but I read that as planning confirmed. Does everyone else? edit:- " meaning planning permission for the club’s new training complex can now be issued." Not "has been issued" but "can now be issued". The Facbook headline is "Planning Permission Issued" so slight confusion. Sorry for being pedantic but is anyone up to date with current English Planningspeak? [Post edited 2 Jan 2014 11:14]
|
No, I read it differently. It is carefully worded. The story is announcing a development agreement - I don't know what that is but as they say something like they can now proceed with planning permission I presume this is just another stage in the process and that planning is yet to be granted. The tone is presumptive, I guess that is what they are trying to communicate. | |
| Follow me on Twitter @tootinghoop |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 11:48 - Jan 2 with 1952 views | RedbourneR | It's still another great step forward for the club so it's a good way to start the year off. That and the win yesterday of course ... | | | |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 12:00 - Jan 2 with 1923 views | stansleftfoot | It seems that the planning process and thus the public consultation is over, so that the 106 agreement can be signed. Effectively QPR can issue contracts to contractors to start building when they have proved to the council that they can fund the £30 Million project. QPR seem to have made a blind side run and slipped past the objectors by avoiding signing a lease which would transfer ownership or rights for use to QPR. (Free for 200 years) the main bone of contention. The Lease, it has been agreed, will now only be signed when the development is complete. | | | |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 13:08 - Jan 2 with 1731 views | ade_qpr |
Planning permission for Warren Farm confirmed on 12:00 - Jan 2 by stansleftfoot | It seems that the planning process and thus the public consultation is over, so that the 106 agreement can be signed. Effectively QPR can issue contracts to contractors to start building when they have proved to the council that they can fund the £30 Million project. QPR seem to have made a blind side run and slipped past the objectors by avoiding signing a lease which would transfer ownership or rights for use to QPR. (Free for 200 years) the main bone of contention. The Lease, it has been agreed, will now only be signed when the development is complete. |
Have no understanding of the English laws and the 106 agreement. Wondering what's to stop the objectors from firing up again when the lease is signed? If they are complaining about the sale of the land does it matter whether its vacant or structures have been put in place? Sorry for the ignorance but I'm just curious. | |
| If a turtle doesn't have a shell, is he homeless or naked? |
| |
| |