HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! 16:33 - Feb 9 with 2521 views | SomersetHoops | That is all. | |
| | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:40 - Feb 9 with 1964 views | QPR1882 | | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:41 - Feb 9 with 1953 views | Ranger78 | He's not even a Premier League footballer! Tony Fernandes would probably be just as good up front! Redknapp constantly escapes criticism and constantly blames everyone else! He has some serious questions to answer in my opinion | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:43 - Feb 9 with 1944 views | corse | he is not a prem player. decent championship player at most. bench for him for the rest of the season then get rid. | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:44 - Feb 9 with 1937 views | WeaverQPR | id keep for next season, decent enough for championship | |
| |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:45 - Feb 9 with 1927 views | Jamie | A week ago people were apoplectic when it was suggested he would be swapped with Crouch. | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:46 - Feb 9 with 1920 views | stuabd |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:44 - Feb 9 by WeaverQPR | id keep for next season, decent enough for championship |
We have to. He's good at that level and he does at least try. | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:46 - Feb 9 with 1916 views | HollowayRanger |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:43 - Feb 9 by corse | he is not a prem player. decent championship player at most. bench for him for the rest of the season then get rid. |
YEA because we wont want decent championship players next season right? | |
| |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:47 - Feb 9 with 1909 views | Ranger78 |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:45 - Feb 9 by Jamie | A week ago people were apoplectic when it was suggested he would be swapped with Crouch. |
Not me. He tries hard... So what.... So would I??? I don't blame Mackie and I love him as a man but its time to move on, he's not very good, end of! | | | | Login to get fewer ads
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:52 - Feb 9 with 1887 views | corse |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:46 - Feb 9 by HollowayRanger | YEA because we wont want decent championship players next season right? |
that what he is now. a decent championship player. he has been going downward. next season he ll be worse. no use next season. | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:01 - Feb 9 with 1847 views | Match82 |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 16:52 - Feb 9 by corse | that what he is now. a decent championship player. he has been going downward. next season he ll be worse. no use next season. |
i think the point was next year we'll need decent championship players. And I think Mackie's shown improvement every year, not exactly his fault if he's being shoved up front, is it? And I'm pretty sure he was in midfield today anyway | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:01 - Feb 9 with 1842 views | DylanP | Agreed. Mackie is a great player. But any time we start with him on the field we are wasting a spot on the field and all his talent. He is fantastic off the bench. That is when he has excelled. When he comes in and injects that extra speed and energy, that is when he makes a difference. Starting him just shows how few attacking options we have inspite of 29 transfers in 2 years. | |
| |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:04 - Feb 9 with 1821 views | Sharpy | "Agreed. Mackie is a great player" No he ain`t | |
| Once you`ve had black, you never go back ! |
| |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:06 - Feb 9 with 1810 views | Nov77 |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:01 - Feb 9 by Match82 | i think the point was next year we'll need decent championship players. And I think Mackie's shown improvement every year, not exactly his fault if he's being shoved up front, is it? And I'm pretty sure he was in midfield today anyway |
Shoved up front? That's the position that HE claims is his best. When he plays crap wide right, people say its not his fault he's playing out of position, when he plays crap up front they say its not his fault he's been playing out of position. Where the hell is his position then? | |
| |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:08 - Feb 9 with 1789 views | QPR1882 |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:06 - Feb 9 by Nov77 | Shoved up front? That's the position that HE claims is his best. When he plays crap wide right, people say its not his fault he's playing out of position, when he plays crap up front they say its not his fault he's been playing out of position. Where the hell is his position then? |
Bench warmer | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:08 - Feb 9 with 1786 views | JAPRANGERS | he is the sort of workman like player we will need as we struggle in the championship next season | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:12 - Feb 9 with 1766 views | Nov77 | Oh Bollox to his work rate, what about some sort of end product, something tangible? Him and Derry go off and all of a sudden we start retaining posession. Go figure. | |
| |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:20 - Feb 9 with 1733 views | Ranger78 |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:12 - Feb 9 by Nov77 | Oh Bollox to his work rate, what about some sort of end product, something tangible? Him and Derry go off and all of a sudden we start retaining posession. Go figure. |
I'm with you. When work rate is the only thing you have to offer, the PL is not for you | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:36 - Feb 9 with 1700 views | QPR1882 | Love all this Mackie work rate bollox........work rate does not put points on the board goals do,Mackie don't score goals. | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:46 - Feb 9 with 1658 views | Nov77 |
Running around a lot counts for nothing if it is aimless and produces nothing.. Scoring a goal does not mean you've had a good game, it means you had a good moment. If you don't score you still need to contribute something to the team, something mackie doesn't do. Here's a question for you. What's the longest pass you've ever seen mackie hit? Guarantee its no longer than twenty yards. That's his field of vision. Totally oblivious to options around him, plays with his head down. Very, very limited player. | |
| |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:48 - Feb 9 with 1635 views | DevonWhite | Hence he was played in midfield today... | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:48 - Feb 9 with 1635 views | Jamie | The irony is that we're slating the only player at our club who might get a game at the team who have just smashed us and are 9-1 up on aggregate. | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:49 - Feb 9 with 1631 views | DevonWhite |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:48 - Feb 9 by Jamie | The irony is that we're slating the only player at our club who might get a game at the team who have just smashed us and are 9-1 up on aggregate. |
That's clearly not true. | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:50 - Feb 9 with 1627 views | QPR1882 |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:48 - Feb 9 by Jamie | The irony is that we're slating the only player at our club who might get a game at the team who have just smashed us and are 9-1 up on aggregate. |
only player ? | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:51 - Feb 9 with 1616 views | Jamie |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:49 - Feb 9 by DevonWhite | That's clearly not true. |
Who else would? Samba? Possibly but they're set at CB, likewise for Cesar where they have Vorm. | | | |
HARRY!!!!! MACKIE IS NOT A STRIKER! on 17:53 - Feb 9 with 663 views | MkPaul | I think we are finding that the answer to the question, what happens to a prem team that needs to start Mackie, Derry, and Hill is they get relegated. It means we cannot keep possession of the football and therefore can't build attacks and ultimately can't score. I admire their effort but seriously they are not good enough. | | | |
| |