| EFL Outcome 16:17 - Oct 17 with 3115 views | HullDale |
|  | | |  |
| EFL Outcome on 16:32 - Oct 17 with 3004 views | Sandyman |
Named and shamed.
"...David Bottomley... will be banned from operating as a Relevant Person...received a two-year sanction"
Viz comic had him nailed years ago
 |  | | |
| EFL Outcome on 16:37 - Oct 17 with 2941 views | kel |
You’re far from off the hook, Roger.
We know you’re reading. |  |
| “He was deliberately misleading the EFL” |
| |
| EFL Outcome on 16:47 - Oct 17 with 2849 views | blackdogblue |
Hope FCUM read it as he was obviously picture evidenced trying to worm in there….
In some ways I’m devastated KFC Fylde dumped him when they did… I would have taken great pleasure in seeing the club statement ejecting him from the club…..
Fair play to the EFL… we are now in safe hands so the suspension will never come to fruition. |  |
| |
| EFL Outcome on 16:47 - Oct 17 with 2845 views | EllDale |
It would be interesting to know if, at the hearing in London on 5th September. Messrs Bottomley, Curran and Rose were all in the building at the same time. |  | | |
| EFL Outcome on 16:48 - Oct 17 with 2837 views | wozzrafc |
The suspended six point deduction should be seen for what it is:
A) a vindication for the current board and the actions of the fans who moved so quickly to prevent this hostile takeover taking place.
B) the seriousness of the actions taken by the previous director who has received punishment as part of the ruling.
C) the inadequacy of the EFL regulations which had to be changed when this case was brought to light.
We await the publishing of the full judgement from the EFL!! Only then can the full extent of what went down here be shown to the wider world. | | | |
| EFL Outcome on 16:48 - Oct 17 with 2832 views | EllDale |
| EFL Outcome on 16:47 - Oct 17 by blackdogblue |
Hope FCUM read it as he was obviously picture evidenced trying to worm in there….
In some ways I’m devastated KFC Fylde dumped him when they did… I would have taken great pleasure in seeing the club statement ejecting him from the club…..
Fair play to the EFL… we are now in safe hands so the suspension will never come to fruition. |
They aren't EFL clubs though.
Would the ban apply to any of their employees? | | | |
| EFL Outcome on 16:49 - Oct 17 with 2826 views | Sandyman |
Extra loud rendition of a recent song required at home games, because it's what the EFL have done to him!!! All in the public domain.
"Que Sera Sera
Whatever will be will be
Fook off David Bottomley
Que Sera Sera"
Yes David, that is what Rochdale fans sing about you.
There's a couple more as well. [Post edited 17 Oct 2022 16:57]
| | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| EFL Outcome on 16:58 - Oct 17 with 2741 views | blackdogblue |
Not sure but not a glowing point on your CV is it?
Neither is “racialist or “touching” etc, it’s about association or GUILTY with tvvats like him… | |
| |
| EFL Outcome on 17:54 - Oct 17 with 2472 views | DorkingDale |
I strongly suspect that at least one of them was Zooming in from Dubai.... | | | |
| EFL Outcome on 18:02 - Oct 17 with 2417 views | DorkingDale |
So do we take it that Southall was never charged? Or was he exonerated? The information in the public domain did not contain the identities of those charged.
It appears that the thieving slimeball has wriggled out of it again. | | | |
| EFL Outcome on 18:05 - Oct 17 with 2393 views | judd |
| EFL Outcome on 18:02 - Oct 17 by DorkingDale |
So do we take it that Southall was never charged? Or was he exonerated? The information in the public domain did not contain the identities of those charged.
It appears that the thieving slimeball has wriggled out of it again. |
He didn't breach any regulations. His deal was to acquire 25%, which is below the 30% mark set by EFL. [Post edited 17 Oct 2022 18:57]
|  |
| |
| EFL Outcome on 18:31 - Oct 17 with 2274 views | DorkingDale |
| EFL Outcome on 18:05 - Oct 17 by judd |
He didn't breach any regulations. His deal was to acquire 25%, which is below the 30% mark set by EFL. [Post edited 17 Oct 2022 18:57]
|
So, the photographic evidence of him being involved with the scumbags from the start doesn't mean a thing then. What about him claiming to own 35% when the shares hadn't even been registered? Presumably this misinformation does not breach any EFL regulations. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
