Emma Raducanu 2022 23:41 - Jan 10 with 14042 views | Dr_Parnassus | Right, new year, new Raducanu thread for the believers and non believers out there. She kicks off the season in Sydney later today against Elena Rybakina looking for a win and some nice form going into the Aussie Open. It’s a fairly comfortable Rybakina win for me. Straight sets if I was pushed. Although always difficult to predict after the Xmas break. | |
| | |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 18:43 - Jan 18 with 1509 views | shingle |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 20:38 - Jan 16 by Dr_Parnassus | What am I twisting? You just have no idea what you are talking about and think you are correcting someone when you aren’t. I am talking about main tour events, not challengers or ITF’s. I said “outside the US Open first and second round exits is pretty much what we saw from her” - that is simply a fact. The 4th Round in Wimbledon accounted for the “pretty much”, I have spoken about that Wimbledon run in detail previously. The Challenger event was not counted - and won’t be counted… as it’s a Challenger event. The top seed in the challenger event you are trying to claim was world number 30 (Danielle Collins), the second was world number 50 (Petra Martic). These are not mandatory events, if you are unsure what that means, it means the top players don’t have to play them… Tennis is my profession as many people on here can attest, I would suggest you take your medicine on the subject as you will never “win” if you wish to debate it with me, I assure you. You will just be making yourself look silly (again). [Post edited 16 Jan 2022 20:59]
|
You lost as soon as you put up false facts earlier you header that is why others pulled you up on it, and once you realise you messed up you come out with your I did not mean that tournament because it is a lesser tournament jargon, mate I can assure you the only person who thinks you are as you say an expert is you, a legend in your own mind type of guy. | | | |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 22:03 - Jan 18 with 1441 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 18:43 - Jan 18 by shingle | You lost as soon as you put up false facts earlier you header that is why others pulled you up on it, and once you realise you messed up you come out with your I did not mean that tournament because it is a lesser tournament jargon, mate I can assure you the only person who thinks you are as you say an expert is you, a legend in your own mind type of guy. |
False facts? You mean facts you didn’t understand, tried to correct due to your lack of understanding of the sport, then realised you were wrong and still sticking with it regardless? I have spoken previously about the difference between ITF, Challenger and Main Tour. Those of us in tennis discount ITF and Challenger when discussing records on the main tour, they are often split and not merged. A bit like counting LDV Vans Trophy wins when discussing Premier League record. When Raducanu’s US Open win is reported on, they state “her first tour title”… why? When she has already won X2 ITF titles?…. Because they aren’t counted on the main tour. Andy Murray is known to have won 46 singles titles… Why? When I know for a fact he’s won 53 if you count the x5 ITF futures titles and x2 Challenger titles?…. Because they aren’t counted on the main tour. You sound ridiculous but just don’t realise it. All because of your haste to correct what was a correct sentence. If you don’t understand that, that’s not my problem. I have tried very nicely to explain it to you several times, but judging from your posting history - understanding doesn’t seem to be your goal, you just want to troll. [Post edited 18 Jan 2022 22:58]
| |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 23:15 - Jan 18 with 1368 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 13:39 - Jan 18 by raynor94 | Not to shabby today, we await the experts opinion |
Nobody said she would never win another game again mind Raynor. What was said is she would never win another Grand Slam title. She will have a fine career and park herself in the top 25 for a while. It was the laughable comparisons to Serena that caused the interest on here and the simple stance that she will not even come close to dominating the game as suggested. She’s a decent player, but she’s not an elite player. Elite as in top 5 consistently. She will win far more games than she loses though, like everyone else in the top 25. There will be a few forays into the second week of a slam but I’ll be shocked if she ever makes another GS Semi let alone win another Final. | |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 06:19 - Jan 19 with 1323 views | shingle |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 22:03 - Jan 18 by Dr_Parnassus | False facts? You mean facts you didn’t understand, tried to correct due to your lack of understanding of the sport, then realised you were wrong and still sticking with it regardless? I have spoken previously about the difference between ITF, Challenger and Main Tour. Those of us in tennis discount ITF and Challenger when discussing records on the main tour, they are often split and not merged. A bit like counting LDV Vans Trophy wins when discussing Premier League record. When Raducanu’s US Open win is reported on, they state “her first tour title”… why? When she has already won X2 ITF titles?…. Because they aren’t counted on the main tour. Andy Murray is known to have won 46 singles titles… Why? When I know for a fact he’s won 53 if you count the x5 ITF futures titles and x2 Challenger titles?…. Because they aren’t counted on the main tour. You sound ridiculous but just don’t realise it. All because of your haste to correct what was a correct sentence. If you don’t understand that, that’s not my problem. I have tried very nicely to explain it to you several times, but judging from your posting history - understanding doesn’t seem to be your goal, you just want to troll. [Post edited 18 Jan 2022 22:58]
|
Your getting desperate now just look at the lenth of your replies to everyone, you were wrong with the lists you put up I noticed it others noticed it so politely told you that you messed up and you go off on these long drawn out rants trying to explain yourself, mate your not the expert you think you are accept it and move on, man up and stop being so insecure mun its only a foofball forum you header. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 07:51 - Jan 19 with 1287 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 07:24 - Jan 19 by Gwyn737 | Is that you in the pink?, 😉 |
Nah I’d beat them both | |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 11:03 - Jan 20 with 1085 views | Dr_Parnassus | Well that’s that for Emma from Australia. Another tournament not passing the 2nd round, losing to Kovinic. Kovinic is 98th in the world, 27 years old and never been past the 2nd round of a Slam. Emma slightly hampered by a niggling injury but if she has any serious ambitions about being an elite player (which she should be as US Open champion) - then the likes of Kovinic need to be despatched with ease. | |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 13:29 - Jan 20 with 979 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 13:25 - Jan 20 by Best_loser | You said raducanu should win comfortably today , she lost, that's called getting something wrong , maybe you SHOULD just accept you were wrong for once instead of acting like some automaton that's programmed to never do that |
I did say that she should win comfortably, I stand by that and am correct regardless of outcome. I didn’t say she would win. “Should” doesn’t mean “would”. A reigning Grand Slam Champion should be beating someone barely in the top 100 who has never been past the 2nd round in a Slam at the age of 27 and known for being an average tour player. Do you disagree then? Swansea should stay up this year with the squad they have, if they don’t… they still should have. That statement would not become wrong. If I get something wrong then I will say so, but I’m not going to say I am just to please trolls like you when I obviously was not. The only way I could be “wrong” with what I said is if she went past the 3rd round as I said that “wouldn’t” happen. There is a reason I use “would and wouldn’t” and at other times use “should”. One is a prediction (won’t go past round 3 if she gets there) - the other is a fact (should beat world number 98). Easy when you understand English isn’t it? [Post edited 20 Jan 2022 13:43]
| |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 13:34 - Jan 20 with 975 views | Dr_Parnassus | (Man United 8-0 up against Barnet at half time). Statement 1: “Man Utd should really win from here” Statement 2: “Man Utd will win from here” (Man United go on to lose 8-9). One statement is correct… the other statement is incorrect. No prizes awarded for guessing which one is which due to the ease and obviousness of why one is wrong and the other is right. | |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 13:40 - Jan 20 with 969 views | Best_loser |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 13:29 - Jan 20 by Dr_Parnassus | I did say that she should win comfortably, I stand by that and am correct regardless of outcome. I didn’t say she would win. “Should” doesn’t mean “would”. A reigning Grand Slam Champion should be beating someone barely in the top 100 who has never been past the 2nd round in a Slam at the age of 27 and known for being an average tour player. Do you disagree then? Swansea should stay up this year with the squad they have, if they don’t… they still should have. That statement would not become wrong. If I get something wrong then I will say so, but I’m not going to say I am just to please trolls like you when I obviously was not. The only way I could be “wrong” with what I said is if she went past the 3rd round as I said that “wouldn’t” happen. There is a reason I use “would and wouldn’t” and at other times use “should”. One is a prediction (won’t go past round 3 if she gets there) - the other is a fact (should beat world number 98). Easy when you understand English isn’t it? [Post edited 20 Jan 2022 13:43]
|
Stick to today's game please , stop moving goalposts and being abusive in your usual arrogant way , in future when you say someone should win and they do , don't jump up and down because you didn't say would | | | |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 13:48 - Jan 20 with 956 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 13:40 - Jan 20 by Best_loser | Stick to today's game please , stop moving goalposts and being abusive in your usual arrogant way , in future when you say someone should win and they do , don't jump up and down because you didn't say would |
So I’m guessing by now you have realised what words actually mean and that you can’t just make them up to have your own meanings? Good. Can you teach the rest of your trolls now please? - “Should win” is a fact based on ability - “Man Utd first team “should” beat Barnet reserves”. (That statement will remain correct regardless of result). - “Will win” is a prediction of the future - “Man Utd first team “will” beat Barnet Reserves”. (That is a statement you can get excited about if it fails to happen). Now relate that to what I correctly said - as I was very careful to use both “should” and “wouldn’t” in two different sentences and used them for that exact reason. “ ‘Should’ beat Kovinic”… “ ‘Wouldn’t’ get past round 3 ‘should’ she get there”. As I said, I’m intentionally very careful with my words as I have trolls hanging off every single one of them. So you won’t be able to change the meanings of those intentionally constructed words to suit I’m afraid. Cheers. [Post edited 20 Jan 2022 13:58]
| |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 14:04 - Jan 20 with 931 views | trampie | Blydi hell Dr P favoured Stephens to beat Raducanu and then thought Raducanu would wipe the floor with Kovinic. | |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 14:17 - Jan 20 with 898 views | trampie | You said that if Stephens was in shape that she should beat Raducanu, Stephens lost. You said that Raducanu should beat Danka Kovinic comfortably and Raducanu lost. You got everything wrong Dr P. | |
| |
Emma Raducanu 2022 on 14:29 - Jan 20 with 866 views | trampie | We all know what you said Dr P, you thought that Stephens was going to beat Raducanu and you was wrong and then you thought that Raducanu would beat Kovinic and yet again you was wrong. | |
| |
| |