| Careful what you wish for on 20:01 - Nov 5 with 1289 views | danehoop |
I once met briefly Jake Burns and the boys in the early 90's outside a hotel in Leicester.
We were on a stag weekend. We didn't know it but the band were staying in the same hotel. We discovered this at about 6AM when the fire alarm went off and we all had to trapse outside whilst the fire brigade turned up. Needless to say a load a very hungover stag party wasn't exactly appreciative of this situation, generally looking like shyte. SLF were looking even worse than we did, never meet your heros when you all feeling like death warmed up. It doesn't make for great conversation.
Fantastic band and one of the best live bands I have seen (albeit once). |  |
| Never knowingly understood |
|  |
| Careful what you wish for on 20:04 - Nov 5 with 1284 views | kensalriser |
I've read plenty of QPR related drivel in the last 24 hours but this is like a mass outbreak of Mexican dysentry at a horse show. |  |
| |
| Careful what you wish for on 20:12 - Nov 5 with 1262 views | johncharles |
| Careful what you wish for on 20:04 - Nov 5 by kensalriser |
I've read plenty of QPR related drivel in the last 24 hours but this is like a mass outbreak of Mexican dysentry at a horse show. |
Take your word for that |  |
| Strong and stable my arse. |
| |
| Careful what you wish for on 20:40 - Nov 5 with 1217 views | DevonWhite |
| Careful what you wish for on 17:32 - Nov 5 by aves |
Also mentions of Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink - almost spat out my tea. Not past Bungle and gang to go after him. |
Better candidate than pretty much anyone else that's been linked with the job. |  | | |
| Careful what you wish for on 20:47 - Nov 5 with 1199 views | Hunterhoop |
| Careful what you wish for on 20:40 - Nov 5 by DevonWhite |
Better candidate than pretty much anyone else that's been linked with the job. |
Why?
Unproven at this level.
Ex-Chelsea
Worked in a good set up with foundations already laid.
Never had to manage "big" names
Why is the best candidate?
As nutty and unstable as he may be, Pearson is clearly the best candidate given what he did at Leicester at this level very recently. |  | | |
| Careful what you wish for on 21:10 - Nov 5 with 1173 views | DeepcutHoop |
| Careful what you wish for on 20:47 - Nov 5 by Hunterhoop |
Why?
Unproven at this level.
Ex-Chelsea
Worked in a good set up with foundations already laid.
Never had to manage "big" names
Why is the best candidate?
As nutty and unstable as he may be, Pearson is clearly the best candidate given what he did at Leicester at this level very recently. |
And took longer to do it than he could possibly get at QPR.
And he doesn't get on with Hoos.
And he's unstable. You mentioned that, but it's important enough to note again. | | | |
| Careful what you wish for on 21:39 - Nov 5 with 1129 views | Hunterhoop |
| Careful what you wish for on 21:10 - Nov 5 by DeepcutHoop |
And took longer to do it than he could possibly get at QPR.
And he doesn't get on with Hoos.
And he's unstable. You mentioned that, but it's important enough to note again. |
Well, I'll concede the nutty point. He has that "something happened to him as a child" instability, I grant you.
However, the fact it took him longer at Leicester than he'll get here is a poor reflection on our board and fans, not him.
And I'm not sure it was Hoos and him who fell out. Thought it was Hoos and someone else. Happy to be corrected, though. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
