HUGHES OUT 16:47 - Oct 6 with 4233 views | Gloucs_R | Had enough of his poor team selection, poor subs, poor tactics. | |
| | |
HUGHES OUT on 01:16 - Oct 7 with 849 views | Brightonhoop | Amazing thread. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 03:25 - Oct 7 with 825 views | QPRJennyxxx | FFS!!!!!! | |
| mmmmmm Lee Cook xxxxxxxxx |
| |
HUGHES OUT on 03:39 - Oct 7 with 825 views | WindsorHoopMan |
HUGHES OUT on 23:07 - Oct 6 by Sharpy | . |
Why do we never sing his name? | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 03:41 - Oct 7 with 823 views | QPRJennyxxx | never been sure if the gh is silent or not. | |
| mmmmmm Lee Cook xxxxxxxxx |
| |
HUGHES OUT on 03:52 - Oct 7 with 821 views | WindsorHoopMan |
HUGHES OUT on 03:41 - Oct 7 by QPRJennyxxx | never been sure if the gh is silent or not. |
I do not like the man? I am in my 28th season and he is the only manager that I feel no QPR love for, I know what we need and he is no good. Look at the eyes, they are dead, there is no QPR within him. Oldie, warlock, venables, wad dock, smith bald eagle, they all had QPR within them. I just do not like him, he is not QPR and never will be | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 04:01 - Oct 7 with 816 views | QPRJennyxxx |
HUGHES OUT on 03:52 - Oct 7 by WindsorHoopMan | I do not like the man? I am in my 28th season and he is the only manager that I feel no QPR love for, I know what we need and he is no good. Look at the eyes, they are dead, there is no QPR within him. Oldie, warlock, venables, wad dock, smith bald eagle, they all had QPR within them. I just do not like him, he is not QPR and never will be |
ha ha ha ha ha. | |
| mmmmmm Lee Cook xxxxxxxxx |
| | Login to get fewer ads
HUGHES OUT on 04:09 - Oct 7 with 812 views | QPRJennyxxx |
HUGHES OUT on 03:52 - Oct 7 by WindsorHoopMan | I do not like the man? I am in my 28th season and he is the only manager that I feel no QPR love for, I know what we need and he is no good. Look at the eyes, they are dead, there is no QPR within him. Oldie, warlock, venables, wad dock, smith bald eagle, they all had QPR within them. I just do not like him, he is not QPR and never will be |
but have you really looked in his eyes? really really. moron. | |
| mmmmmm Lee Cook xxxxxxxxx |
| |
HUGHES OUT on 04:29 - Oct 7 with 805 views | WindsorHoopMan |
HUGHES OUT on 04:09 - Oct 7 by QPRJennyxxx | but have you really looked in his eyes? really really. moron. |
Jenny likes the word moron, she learnt it at the children's home today | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 04:37 - Oct 7 with 803 views | BklynRanger | Just watched it again - this morning's legoman feed was hard to see at times. A few things that still seemed true: 1) Clint should not have been picked at left back. Wasn't that the 2nd time in a row? Without learning? For their first the forward didn't have to break his stride - as soon as he saw Long accelerate into space he KNEW the ball was coming in. Hughes weakened the team from the start with that selection. 2) Picking Anton ahead of Clint at CB. Was Anton ready? Had he trained? What was the point of that? Clint and Nelsen had the beginnings of a solid partnership that Hughes could have kept with throughout this period but has chosen not to. 3) Putting SWP in ahead of Hoilett. Hoilett seems better when he starts and he's far better anyway. Other things were largely down to individual mistakes - Traore changed the game by removing the main point of West Brom's attack but he was utterly inept for their 3rd - 2 chances to track his man, both half heartedly ignored. Bosingwa could've snatched a point but leaned back like a tired amateur. I do think we'll be ok but Hughes is in some ways very outmoded. If he doesn't have a fullback like Fabio who can get forward he just puts another player in their place and asks them to do things that aren't really their game. PLAY TO THEIR INDIVIDUAL STRENGTHS AILSA YOU OVER-VALUED FAIRY. Saying all of that, getting rid of him before the end of November would be the stuff of that fat, orange, kunt Flavio. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 04:43 - Oct 7 with 802 views | MelakaRanger | No not yet!!!!!!! QPR and Hughes and his 'entourage' are inextricably linked at the moment. He has to be given a while longer or we are in danger of the whole pack of cards collapsing. Its still not too late to recover, a win, draw and loss from the next 3 games might get us out of the bottom 3. Lets give this guy 5 more games. If we are still win -less at that time then I believe that most every on of us 'Hughes In' crowd will change sides. And despite all his is saying at the moment, even Tony F will then realise that even with the best will in the world a change was necessary. Whatever happens in the other 3 games, we simply must beat Reading and Southampton at home for him to keep his job. A point or more from the other 3 games would be a welcome surprise. So for the next 5 games I will still Keep the Faith. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 04:50 - Oct 7 with 800 views | QPRJennyxxx |
HUGHES OUT on 04:29 - Oct 7 by WindsorHoopMan | Jenny likes the word moron, she learnt it at the children's home today |
what children's home was that. how is slough tonight? | |
| mmmmmm Lee Cook xxxxxxxxx |
| |
HUGHES OUT on 06:07 - Oct 7 with 792 views | Pattaya_Rs |
HUGHES OUT on 04:37 - Oct 7 by BklynRanger | Just watched it again - this morning's legoman feed was hard to see at times. A few things that still seemed true: 1) Clint should not have been picked at left back. Wasn't that the 2nd time in a row? Without learning? For their first the forward didn't have to break his stride - as soon as he saw Long accelerate into space he KNEW the ball was coming in. Hughes weakened the team from the start with that selection. 2) Picking Anton ahead of Clint at CB. Was Anton ready? Had he trained? What was the point of that? Clint and Nelsen had the beginnings of a solid partnership that Hughes could have kept with throughout this period but has chosen not to. 3) Putting SWP in ahead of Hoilett. Hoilett seems better when he starts and he's far better anyway. Other things were largely down to individual mistakes - Traore changed the game by removing the main point of West Brom's attack but he was utterly inept for their 3rd - 2 chances to track his man, both half heartedly ignored. Bosingwa could've snatched a point but leaned back like a tired amateur. I do think we'll be ok but Hughes is in some ways very outmoded. If he doesn't have a fullback like Fabio who can get forward he just puts another player in their place and asks them to do things that aren't really their game. PLAY TO THEIR INDIVIDUAL STRENGTHS AILSA YOU OVER-VALUED FAIRY. Saying all of that, getting rid of him before the end of November would be the stuff of that fat, orange, kunt Flavio. |
Good post mate.....I am the same, just watched it again this morning.........never as bad second time around..........but Im sorry , I still feel we look like a team who is relegation certanties in first week of October.......All this stuff about MH backroom staff would cost a fortune to sack, but will cost us even more if we are relegated. I was never a Flavio fan, but in any business, you have to address poor management, its simply not working. He needs to be sacked today, Harry Rednapp brought in, Im not saying it will be 20 wins on the trot, but will give us a chance of survival, possibly. TF do what you need to do. Sorry MH you have to go, wait till Xmas would leave us out of reach, and I think without a win . | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 08:22 - Oct 7 with 732 views | corse | continuity of losing games and poor tactics and playing park and swp. some continuity that is. to my deepest amaze this sorry excuse for a manager managed to squeeze park and swp into the starting IX once again. does it read somewhere in their contracts that these two messieurs must start every game? to my not so deep amaze we lost once again cause of this sorry excuse of manager and his poor tactics and choice of starting IX. and probably lost the changing room or at least very close to it. how much would it cost to sack him? £5 million ? how much will it cost us in tv money to get relegated with mr hughes? £50 million at least. quite simple mathematics for me. no doubt the board have understood this too. two weeks break now and if he loses the next game he will be out. i personally would sack him first thing tomorrow morning. absolute cxxp as a manager. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 08:40 - Oct 7 with 716 views | kropotkin41 | Vous etes de La Corse, Corse? I think that TF will probably feel obliged to give Hughes a few more games........ having so publicly backed him 5 minutes ago. | |
| ‘morbid curiosity about where this is all going’ |
| |
HUGHES OUT on 10:42 - Oct 7 with 685 views | dazhoopa |
HUGHES OUT on 08:22 - Oct 7 by corse | continuity of losing games and poor tactics and playing park and swp. some continuity that is. to my deepest amaze this sorry excuse for a manager managed to squeeze park and swp into the starting IX once again. does it read somewhere in their contracts that these two messieurs must start every game? to my not so deep amaze we lost once again cause of this sorry excuse of manager and his poor tactics and choice of starting IX. and probably lost the changing room or at least very close to it. how much would it cost to sack him? £5 million ? how much will it cost us in tv money to get relegated with mr hughes? £50 million at least. quite simple mathematics for me. no doubt the board have understood this too. two weeks break now and if he loses the next game he will be out. i personally would sack him first thing tomorrow morning. absolute cxxp as a manager. |
totally agree,against westham just couldn't get the team selection at home got the result we deserved.to then compound it by playing park out of position,swp atall and clint hill at left back where he hasen't played well for a couple of years just shows he doesn't have a clue,i was prepared to give him a chance but he just can't see his mistakes and he was the one who said we would not be in this position again.bring in harry with the amount of attacking potential in this side he;d have to make a better fist of it wouldn't he. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 12:44 - Oct 7 with 644 views | nadera78 | Anyone who thinks sacking Hughes will bring a miraculous turn around in this club is deluding themselves. Our problems run much deeper than that. What we need to be looking at is what sort of club is QPR and what do we stand for? Because at the moment we're some sort of mini-Chelsea only without the facilities, money or success. West Bromwich Albion are the the model we should be looking at. They're doing all the things we did under Jim Gregory and look set for a nice period in the top flight. Perhaps, if they're really lucky, maybe a cup win or trip to Europe somewhere along the line as well. We, on the other hand, lurch from one mistake to another. And all the time telling ourselves that if we just sign this player or sack that manager then everything will be great. Well it won't. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 12:55 - Oct 7 with 632 views | themodfather |
HUGHES OUT on 12:44 - Oct 7 by nadera78 | Anyone who thinks sacking Hughes will bring a miraculous turn around in this club is deluding themselves. Our problems run much deeper than that. What we need to be looking at is what sort of club is QPR and what do we stand for? Because at the moment we're some sort of mini-Chelsea only without the facilities, money or success. West Bromwich Albion are the the model we should be looking at. They're doing all the things we did under Jim Gregory and look set for a nice period in the top flight. Perhaps, if they're really lucky, maybe a cup win or trip to Europe somewhere along the line as well. We, on the other hand, lurch from one mistake to another. And all the time telling ourselves that if we just sign this player or sack that manager then everything will be great. Well it won't. |
what is hughes away record? it is POOR BEYOND BELIEF muscle injuries could be a training issue, who's responsible for that? the nice passing football is keeping us bottom. i want a few ugly 1-0 wins. ferdy and hill were poor at wba..we lose the ball easily thru zamora and 2 individual moments by 2 talented players have prolonged the agony. tighten up the defence get the ball forward, score a few , win a few..pressure off. hughes is one of world , WORLD FOOTBALL'S TOP EARNERS, £3M year, in the top 15 ...rumours are we are losing £5m a month and are rock bottom after 7..1/6th of season gone. hughes has had plenty to spend no doubt about that. we we save in transfer fees is lost to agents and signing on fees and likely loyalty bonuses! we all want stability, another sacking doesn't show that but STAYING up is vital..£75m+ is the tv money per club NEXT season. most of the club plans i feel are based on those figures, cos this club ( on it's own) doesn't have a bucket to pee in. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 13:03 - Oct 7 with 624 views | nadera78 |
HUGHES OUT on 12:55 - Oct 7 by themodfather | what is hughes away record? it is POOR BEYOND BELIEF muscle injuries could be a training issue, who's responsible for that? the nice passing football is keeping us bottom. i want a few ugly 1-0 wins. ferdy and hill were poor at wba..we lose the ball easily thru zamora and 2 individual moments by 2 talented players have prolonged the agony. tighten up the defence get the ball forward, score a few , win a few..pressure off. hughes is one of world , WORLD FOOTBALL'S TOP EARNERS, £3M year, in the top 15 ...rumours are we are losing £5m a month and are rock bottom after 7..1/6th of season gone. hughes has had plenty to spend no doubt about that. we we save in transfer fees is lost to agents and signing on fees and likely loyalty bonuses! we all want stability, another sacking doesn't show that but STAYING up is vital..£75m+ is the tv money per club NEXT season. most of the club plans i feel are based on those figures, cos this club ( on it's own) doesn't have a bucket to pee in. |
You're missing the point entirely. It matters very little whether or not we sack Hughes, and who we replace him with. This club is set up to fail because everyone is too busy chasing an impossible dream to actually get started on the work required to improve the club. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 14:16 - Oct 7 with 603 views | jamois |
HUGHES OUT on 04:37 - Oct 7 by BklynRanger | Just watched it again - this morning's legoman feed was hard to see at times. A few things that still seemed true: 1) Clint should not have been picked at left back. Wasn't that the 2nd time in a row? Without learning? For their first the forward didn't have to break his stride - as soon as he saw Long accelerate into space he KNEW the ball was coming in. Hughes weakened the team from the start with that selection. 2) Picking Anton ahead of Clint at CB. Was Anton ready? Had he trained? What was the point of that? Clint and Nelsen had the beginnings of a solid partnership that Hughes could have kept with throughout this period but has chosen not to. 3) Putting SWP in ahead of Hoilett. Hoilett seems better when he starts and he's far better anyway. Other things were largely down to individual mistakes - Traore changed the game by removing the main point of West Brom's attack but he was utterly inept for their 3rd - 2 chances to track his man, both half heartedly ignored. Bosingwa could've snatched a point but leaned back like a tired amateur. I do think we'll be ok but Hughes is in some ways very outmoded. If he doesn't have a fullback like Fabio who can get forward he just puts another player in their place and asks them to do things that aren't really their game. PLAY TO THEIR INDIVIDUAL STRENGTHS AILSA YOU OVER-VALUED FAIRY. Saying all of that, getting rid of him before the end of November would be the stuff of that fat, orange, kunt Flavio. |
I agree with this. Look, I think the main thing here is the picking of Clint Hill at LB. Even my 5yr old daughter wouldn't have picked him there. This was an extremely basic and expensive mistake and it is beyond belief that a very highly paid manager could have done this. It cost us both goals with Wet spam and it cost both opening goals yesterday. Everyone at the game was looking around at each other with incredulity. Everyone was talking about it. If we had any kind of full back playing with pace they would not have got down there to get the crosses in. It's as simple as that really. So: 1) After Monday night, it was a certainty that Hill couldn't start at LB, wasn't it? A given surely.....? 2) With Traore on, they couldn't get past him and the crosses stopped. If Traore was fit enough to play that half, why couldn't he start? 3) Why didn't he consider Bosingwa at LB (as per Chelsea) and put SWP at RB (and drill him in that position in training all week)? Would also have allowed Hoilett to start. 4) He could even have tried Park at LB, even Ferdinand, who at least has some leg speed. Desperate times call for creative measures. Out of the box thinking seems to be beyond our sparky. | |
| |
HUGHES OUT on 18:56 - Oct 7 with 556 views | derbyhoop | Calm down, people. The problem is that we are not defending well enough. And that is largely due to the lack of a settled back 4. Monday night, we conceded 2 goals where the RB (Onouha) was sleeping or out of position. So he decides to drop Onouha. We were overrun and bullied in midfield, but Diakite was not available, so he moved Mbia forward. A decision many were calling for after Monday. He was lucky that Bosingwa and Ferdinand were available so he had the option to make those decisions. I don't think either were 100% fit and, when he came on in the second half, Traore was clearly nowhere near 100% fit. But it was a necessary change, because Clint Hill proved what Warnock thought 13 months ago. He isn't quick enough to play left back in the Premiership. You have to give credit to West Brom. They exploited Hill's lack of pace and their first 2 goals came from breaks down our left hand side. For long periods we dominated possession and deservedly pulled one back. The changes Hughes made at half time and during the second half added to our threat going forward. But we got undone by a brilliant passing move. Even so, we stil kept going and got a second. Now if you still want to clamour for a change of manager, then 1) Think about what any other manager would have done differently 2) Who is this miraculous new manager who will be happy to work with the players and staff brought in by Hughes, and immediately produce better results. | |
| "Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain)
Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky |
| |
HUGHES OUT on 19:10 - Oct 7 with 538 views | SomersetHoops | He has until the Reading game - up to ten games for me, although I don't think he can improve things and I'm worried that the players see his tactical and selection errors and are not playing for him because they don't trust him to get it right. He has had more money than any QPR manager before to pick his team and it was up to him to ensure he got the balance right. Instead of accepting that it hasn't worked he keeps trotting out the excuse that they take time to gel. He has an army of staff that he has introduced to work with the team and if they haven't gelled after the resources available you have to woder if they ever will under this management. Even when the players and fans see what is going wrong after ten minutes, why does it take Hughes an hour to do anything about it. He sends out a defence with players out of position and blames them. Who is coaching our defence? They don't seem to be making much of a job of it. Why does Hughes not admit to his errors and take some responsibility for our poor results and performance. If he can't see his selections and tactics have been wrong how will he ever improve things? If we only have 5 points after Reading that won't be enough for me and if he only manages 5 points from a possible 30, unless we make a change we will struggle not to go down. | |
| |
HUGHES OUT on 21:17 - Oct 7 with 516 views | ajcoombes | people seem to be saying its only seven games they can't sack him but he has had since January and he still has only gained one away point at Norwich and that was lucky we stayed up on stoke drawing last year not him keeping us up. I agree i think his tactics are incredibly poor for a man of his experince diakite should start and taarabt, diakite gives us a drive in the middle and with granero and taarabt it should work and hoilett has to play. Park and swp well they can get stuffed park is not a captian another hughes cock up. | | | |
HUGHES OUT on 01:46 - Oct 8 with 477 views | themodfather |
HUGHES OUT on 21:17 - Oct 7 by ajcoombes | people seem to be saying its only seven games they can't sack him but he has had since January and he still has only gained one away point at Norwich and that was lucky we stayed up on stoke drawing last year not him keeping us up. I agree i think his tactics are incredibly poor for a man of his experince diakite should start and taarabt, diakite gives us a drive in the middle and with granero and taarabt it should work and hoilett has to play. Park and swp well they can get stuffed park is not a captian another hughes cock up. |
so many muscle pulls raise my eyebrows i question the training regime we have conceded 3 goals ,or more 4 times in 9 games inc cup and that's crap no away wins in a year is crap so who is to blame? who takes the responsibility? amazingly qpr fans have not sang anti manager songs though you rarely hear a mark hughes blue and white army either, i think there's the issue, few fans actually wanted hughes, now he has a huge pay packet, has been lavishly and been treated like a football genius, based on what? with good resources at man city, what did he win? at a decent fulham side what did he achieve? 7 games of 38 gone and just 2 sad pts on the board, well it's not good enough. ffs just go for a win v everton, chuck in every attacking resource we have cos no one expects us to win, they are on fire and bloody good, so good for it, show some spirit, some spunk and maybe show we hughes should stay, i cannot see one reason right now why he should still be in charge. | | | |
| |