| Polls On This Site 10:07 - Dec 6 with 685 views | SaintNick |
If we take the latest Russell Martin poll around 2,000 people have viewed it, yet only around 100 cared enough to vote, it baffles me why someone would open a thread read a poll and then not bother with just one simple click to vote. |  |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
| |  |
| Polls On This Site on 10:37 - Dec 6 with 639 views | saintwizzler |
Like the protests then… |  |
| We thought that we had the answers,
It was the questions we had wrong. |
| |
| Polls On This Site on 10:42 - Dec 6 with 623 views | kingslandstand1 |
| Polls On This Site on 10:37 - Dec 6 by saintwizzler |
Like the protests then… |
I voted on the poll and couldn't understand who on earth said keep him (unless 130 is up to his tricks again), but re protests, I'm surprised there hasn't been hardly any animosity during the games?
I don't believe that is right as it will totally demoralise the players I'd guess, however it may get a message across if they don't know how the fans feel |  | | |
| Polls On This Site on 10:42 - Dec 6 with 625 views | IanSouthstander |
I'm guessing that it's because you have to be a logged on member of the board to vote, and a good amount of the 2000 viewers were casual readers. |  | | |
| Polls On This Site on 11:18 - Dec 6 with 555 views | MattFinish |
I voted
Although I think any protest should be targeted more at Sports Republic rather than just the managerial situation
SR aspire to be Red Bull but they are barely Red Bull Lite. Clueless bunch of rank amateurs |  | | |
| Polls On This Site on 11:26 - Dec 6 with 530 views | pjt50 |
Isn't that 2000 views rather than 2000 people? Got to admit I've looked at it several times to check progress... |  |
| |
| Polls On This Site on 11:36 - Dec 6 with 503 views | MytchettSaint |
| Polls On This Site on 10:42 - Dec 6 by kingslandstand1 |
I voted on the poll and couldn't understand who on earth said keep him (unless 130 is up to his tricks again), but re protests, I'm surprised there hasn't been hardly any animosity during the games?
I don't believe that is right as it will totally demoralise the players I'd guess, however it may get a message across if they don't know how the fans feel |
Wednesday night was the first time I felt the crowd were really starting to turn on him (RM) but nothing towards the team aside from Lumley being told to not f*ck around with it. The frustrations were wholly with the noddy on the touchline. |  |
| |
| Polls On This Site on 11:49 - Dec 6 with 479 views | arfurdent |
SR probably do not care about fan sentiment as it is a very small line item on the budget account. you could speculate that the fan and media interest in what is going on raises the profile for the club and advertisers
No such thing as bad publicity.
Only poictures o empty terraces might have an impact on the advertisers but with 22,000+ STs sold that is unlikely. |  |
| And the White Knight is talking backwards
And the Red Queen's off with her head |
| |
| Polls On This Site on 12:57 - Dec 6 with 403 views | SaintNick |
| Polls On This Site on 10:42 - Dec 6 by kingslandstand1 |
I voted on the poll and couldn't understand who on earth said keep him (unless 130 is up to his tricks again), but re protests, I'm surprised there hasn't been hardly any animosity during the games?
I don't believe that is right as it will totally demoralise the players I'd guess, however it may get a message across if they don't know how the fans feel |
The culprit owned up to me, the Fans Forum guy is an Ipswich fan and he was doing something on the site and saw the poll, so thought he would vote | |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Polls On This Site on 13:14 - Dec 6 with 370 views | TimSaint |
It is because the same people go back multiple times to see how their vote and the poll in general is doing. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
