Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Question for Pinner 19:51 - Jan 8 with 4690 viewspaulhoop2

Don’t worry not about a ref !

If the shootout continued would we have been able to bring another keeper on for the injured Archer ?

Poll: Now it’s slightly clearer cut who do you want as manager ?

0
Question for Pinner on 12:30 - Jan 13 with 486 viewsDixie_CT

Question for Pinner on 15:36 - Jan 12 by PinnerPaul

Seen it now - agree with Clive's match report - that WAS a long old watch and I was in the dry and warm!

Incident you mention - difficult to see as only a few camera angles.

Impossible to see if he was offside and pictures I saw don't really show all the contact with Albert.

Strangely though, it was almost on the exact same blade of grass on the pitch as the incident in the Man Utd/Villa game where Villa's goal WAS chalked off because a player in an offside position had blocked off Cavani - a decision that did NOT get universal agreement on RefChat though!


I thought the decision to rule the Villa goal out was right.

The Villa player purposefully stood in a significantly offside position and Cavani was impeded by this.

The subjectivity of whether he would of got there or not (I think if he didn’t get there he still could have impacted the Villa players decision of making with the header across goal and the receiving players positioning) was outweighed by my previous interpretation.

What I thought was wrong and delayed the process, was by reviewing it from when the goal was scored and if that was offside by the ball being touched again. Start at the start and roll it forward from there. It’s what rugby does and is the logical way to assess it.

I wonder if there is a procedure for reviewing incidents that have multiple situations?
0
Question for Pinner on 14:18 - Jan 13 with 453 viewsPinnerPaul

Question for Pinner on 12:30 - Jan 13 by Dixie_CT

I thought the decision to rule the Villa goal out was right.

The Villa player purposefully stood in a significantly offside position and Cavani was impeded by this.

The subjectivity of whether he would of got there or not (I think if he didn’t get there he still could have impacted the Villa players decision of making with the header across goal and the receiving players positioning) was outweighed by my previous interpretation.

What I thought was wrong and delayed the process, was by reviewing it from when the goal was scored and if that was offside by the ball being touched again. Start at the start and roll it forward from there. It’s what rugby does and is the logical way to assess it.

I wonder if there is a procedure for reviewing incidents that have multiple situations?


If there is, it will be different next week!

Humans are consistently inconsistent so no surprise that it continues when the same people are sat in Stockley Park!
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024