Jack to a king LTD?? 20:38 - Feb 7 with 8246 views | Porthcawlswan | Anyone know what this is about? Check companies house | | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 20:42 - Feb 7 with 6600 views | dobjack2 | Are we going to have another film? If so will it be filed under true life, fantasy or horror? [Post edited 7 Feb 2019 20:43]
| | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 20:48 - Feb 7 with 6549 views | WarwickHunt |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 20:42 - Feb 7 by dobjack2 | Are we going to have another film? If so will it be filed under true life, fantasy or horror? [Post edited 7 Feb 2019 20:43]
|
Disney turned it down on the grounds it was too far fetched. | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 21:00 - Feb 7 with 6488 views | Porthcawlswan | There's some interesting things on companies house about appointments, dineen, pearlman etc | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 21:33 - Feb 7 with 6356 views | Dewi1jack |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 21:10 - Feb 7 by LeonWasGod | Porn innit. The Res jacking off over mugshots of the sellouts, with a Huwbert/Dimwit/Res spit roast finale 😂 (Sorry T2C ) |
Now there's an awful, horrible picture you've stuck in people's heads | |
| If you wake up breathing, thats a good start to your day and you'll make many thousands of people envious. |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 21:38 - Feb 7 with 6330 views | QJumpingJack |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 21:00 - Feb 7 by Porthcawlswan | There's some interesting things on companies house about appointments, dineen, pearlman etc |
can you post a link please. | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 21:54 - Feb 7 with 6238 views | QJumpingJack |
thanks. So Pearlman joined last week. Dineen resigned this week. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:01 - Feb 7 with 6180 views | longlostjack |
Why would he do that? Who are the “creditors” in the current liabilities? [Post edited 7 Feb 2019 22:10]
| |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:03 - Feb 7 with 6164 views | Chief |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 21:54 - Feb 7 by QJumpingJack | thanks. So Pearlman joined last week. Dineen resigned this week. |
What's that all about then? | |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:05 - Feb 7 with 6155 views | headcleaner | interesting reading when you click on Dineen's name. SWANSEA CITY ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL CLUB LIMITED(THE) (00123414) whats the "The" all about? why is the clubs business split into so many subsidiaries? premier club, management committee? and I take it one of those addresses would be his home address. or are they non-existent premises or just a shelf company address? Seems they spend half their time shifting directorships and appointing and resigning instead of actually doing a job | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:05 - Feb 7 with 6150 views | swan65split |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:01 - Feb 7 by longlostjack | Why would he do that? Who are the “creditors” in the current liabilities? [Post edited 7 Feb 2019 22:10]
|
????? I havent really looked at things yet, I been too busy , I may have some time over the weekend, but it may be a bit too much for me to workout. Reason,,,my missis is the financial expert, i am not trusted with the pin number, lol | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:19 - Feb 7 with 6085 views | longlostjack |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:03 - Feb 7 by Chief | What's that all about then? |
Jack to a King Ltd looks insolvent to me. Why would you want to be appointed a director of an insolvent company? [Post edited 7 Feb 2019 22:33]
| |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:45 - Feb 7 with 5959 views | TenbySwan | It all looks very shifty to me. Needs fully investigating by someone who knows what they are doing. There may be some answers as to where the money has all gone? | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 23:19 - Feb 7 with 5892 views | Loyal |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:45 - Feb 7 by TenbySwan | It all looks very shifty to me. Needs fully investigating by someone who knows what they are doing. There may be some answers as to where the money has all gone? |
No matter what excuses are made by the very few, the cashflow and where it went will ensure these yanks are ousted. | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 23:25 - Feb 7 with 5882 views | ploppy |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 22:19 - Feb 7 by longlostjack | Jack to a King Ltd looks insolvent to me. Why would you want to be appointed a director of an insolvent company? [Post edited 7 Feb 2019 22:33]
|
Why do you say that? Is it because of those numbers in parentheses on the accounts? I don't know the first thing about accounting, but I'd guess they're codes or something - not cash amounts. It's all very strange though. It says the company's business is video distribution or something. Why's Pearlman a director? And I don't suppose it's a coincidence that people have resigned at the same time that Pearlman joined. | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 04:56 - Feb 8 with 5718 views | bonymine | My simplistic interpretation of this having viewed several of the documents filed at CH is that the Football Club made interest free loans of £1.2M to JTAK Ltd to enable the production of the JTAK film on the basis that this debt would be repaid from future film rights/sales. The most recent Accounts filed for the year ended 28 Feb 2018 reveal that the debt owed to the Football Club still stands at £801,660. [Post edited 8 Feb 2019 5:00]
| |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 05:50 - Feb 8 with 5679 views | ScottishEddie | The usual morons. | |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 06:17 - Feb 8 with 5666 views | Dr_Winston |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 04:56 - Feb 8 by bonymine | My simplistic interpretation of this having viewed several of the documents filed at CH is that the Football Club made interest free loans of £1.2M to JTAK Ltd to enable the production of the JTAK film on the basis that this debt would be repaid from future film rights/sales. The most recent Accounts filed for the year ended 28 Feb 2018 reveal that the debt owed to the Football Club still stands at £801,660. [Post edited 8 Feb 2019 5:00]
|
On face value it would appear that the club itself paid for the commercial that the original owners used to sell it and personally enrich themselves. Of course, the club was never reimbursed from these massive profits for the losses made on the advertisement that the BBC could probably have knocked together for 5% of the cost. That whole thing stinks far more than anything the Americans have come up with so far. | |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 08:20 - Feb 8 with 5555 views | bonymine |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 05:50 - Feb 8 by ScottishEddie | The usual morons. |
From that post when you say morons I take it you mean Jenkins, Morgan, Dineen, The Clog et al ? Alternatively, I would be intrigued to hear your own interpretation of these official Accounts filed at Companies House which are in black and white but clearly not visible through those rose tinted Sellout specs you are always wearing ? | |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 08:41 - Feb 8 with 5500 views | Brynmill_Jack |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 05:50 - Feb 8 by ScottishEddie | The usual morons. |
We all know that the sellouts view us as morons , and by that I mean the entire fanbase. But thanks for confirming it Leigh (or whoever the f*ck you are). | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 08:54 - Feb 8 with 5470 views | bonymine |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 05:50 - Feb 8 by ScottishEddie | The usual morons. |
To make matters a little simpler for you to comprehend, perhaps you would care to follow this idiots guide in order to view the relevant content ; 1) Click on the link provided 2) Click on filing history 3) Click on 22 June 2015 (view PDF) 4) Scroll down to page 5 of 6 and read the statement under ‘Going Concern’. Here it is anyway just in case the above instructions prove a little too challlenging for you ... ‘To finance the production of the film From A Jack To A King, Swansea City FC Limited have made unsecured interest free advances to the company of £1,200,000.00, of which £1,161,150.42 remains outstanding at 28 February 2015. The directors are confident that future sales will be sufficient for the company to meet its liabilities as they fall due. Future profits will be allocated to repayment of the outstanding advances. The directors of Swansea City FC Ltd have agreed that repayments will be limited to future profits from the sale of film rights of From A Jack To A King. As a consequence of the above agreement the directors are confident that the company will be able to meet its other liabilities as and when they fall due. As a result they have adopted the Going concern basis’. Clear enough for you now Eddie boy ? | |
| |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 09:12 - Feb 8 with 5401 views | WarwickHunt |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 08:54 - Feb 8 by bonymine | To make matters a little simpler for you to comprehend, perhaps you would care to follow this idiots guide in order to view the relevant content ; 1) Click on the link provided 2) Click on filing history 3) Click on 22 June 2015 (view PDF) 4) Scroll down to page 5 of 6 and read the statement under ‘Going Concern’. Here it is anyway just in case the above instructions prove a little too challlenging for you ... ‘To finance the production of the film From A Jack To A King, Swansea City FC Limited have made unsecured interest free advances to the company of £1,200,000.00, of which £1,161,150.42 remains outstanding at 28 February 2015. The directors are confident that future sales will be sufficient for the company to meet its liabilities as they fall due. Future profits will be allocated to repayment of the outstanding advances. The directors of Swansea City FC Ltd have agreed that repayments will be limited to future profits from the sale of film rights of From A Jack To A King. As a consequence of the above agreement the directors are confident that the company will be able to meet its other liabilities as and when they fall due. As a result they have adopted the Going concern basis’. Clear enough for you now Eddie boy ? |
It grossed about 80k at the box office last time I looked. I doubt if the DVD sold many copies either. Around £39k sounds about the right net return. “The directors are confident that future sales will be sufficient for the company to meet its liabilities as they fall due. Future profits will be allocated to repayment of the outstanding advances.” | | | |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 09:45 - Feb 8 with 5310 views | longlostjack |
Jack to a king LTD?? on 08:54 - Feb 8 by bonymine | To make matters a little simpler for you to comprehend, perhaps you would care to follow this idiots guide in order to view the relevant content ; 1) Click on the link provided 2) Click on filing history 3) Click on 22 June 2015 (view PDF) 4) Scroll down to page 5 of 6 and read the statement under ‘Going Concern’. Here it is anyway just in case the above instructions prove a little too challlenging for you ... ‘To finance the production of the film From A Jack To A King, Swansea City FC Limited have made unsecured interest free advances to the company of £1,200,000.00, of which £1,161,150.42 remains outstanding at 28 February 2015. The directors are confident that future sales will be sufficient for the company to meet its liabilities as they fall due. Future profits will be allocated to repayment of the outstanding advances. The directors of Swansea City FC Ltd have agreed that repayments will be limited to future profits from the sale of film rights of From A Jack To A King. As a consequence of the above agreement the directors are confident that the company will be able to meet its other liabilities as and when they fall due. As a result they have adopted the Going concern basis’. Clear enough for you now Eddie boy ? |
Stinks. Hopefully will be picked up by the media. | |
| |
| |