By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I don't have any theories, Ux said earlier that the Trust were going to get people involved who could add advice even if they weren't able to devote the time to joining the Trust board and I said I thought that was an excellent idea.
I have no idea what advice they did get (other than the QC) to say whether any other advice could or could not have had any influence,
Just because someone else does doesn't mean there's not a discussion to be had.
In any deal there will be a room full of lawyers and accountants and many different opinions and points of view will be discussed.
Anyway. As I said. It's pointless discussing any further.
This seems to be pin that's missed. Deal done weigh numerous advisories with different interpretation of legal / tax position. Our approach seems to be one so called expert.
I wasn't going to get involved in this thread (these personal ones don't end well) but as a point of order Nookie isn't a tax specialist from my understanding. Financial expertise for certain but we're not short of that given our SD.
i am genuinely alarmed if you don't understand the difference between finance and accounting.
i am genuinely alarmed if you don't understand the difference between finance and accounting.
Heh. Behave mun. Not as if I've done any qualifications in the area...
We were talking about tax specialisms, which nobody here has. I could have easily said accounting in the above and the point would have been exactly the same. Stu and Nookie have similar professional backgrounds, albeit in different industries.