| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? 09:52 - Sep 27 with 1203 views | thebigone |
What's the prediction then? Neither Perks or Lundstram are what you'd call defending midfielders which is what we'll need - maybe just for his dead ball skills I think I'd stick with Lundstram - bring Perks on for tired legs later on? |  |
| |  |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 09:57 - Sep 27 with 1198 views | BFC_Tim |
Problem for Jose is that's not an easy choice because neither has stood out. For energy it's Perkins but Lundstram when he cuts the mistakes out is a better footballer. Maybe Orlandi is the solution and drop them both? We need something different there. | |
| |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 10:02 - Sep 27 with 1196 views | we_are_Superior |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 09:57 - Sep 27 by BFC_Tim |
Problem for Jose is that's not an easy choice because neither has stood out. For energy it's Perkins but Lundstram when he cuts the mistakes out is a better footballer. Maybe Orlandi is the solution and drop them both? We need something different there. |
Need better than both if we're all honest - neither has shone and both make mistakes. I'd change both. | |
| |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 11:49 - Sep 27 with 1181 views | spooner |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 10:02 - Sep 27 by we_are_Superior |
Need better than both if we're all honest - neither has shone and both make mistakes. I'd change both. |
Think we're all expecting too much from Cubero too soon.
Temperature, pace of the game, untried at Championship level, quality of those around him AND the opposition.
We're setting him up to fail, I fear.
Having said that, Perks has the determination, but is predictable, Lundstram is raw and error-prone.
Don't suppose Barks will figure, which casts a doubt on Jose's perception of who can and can't, especially if he prefers Zenjov!!! |  | | |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 12:39 - Sep 27 with 1164 views | Osbourne |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 11:49 - Sep 27 by spooner |
Think we're all expecting too much from Cubero too soon.
Temperature, pace of the game, untried at Championship level, quality of those around him AND the opposition.
We're setting him up to fail, I fear.
Having said that, Perks has the determination, but is predictable, Lundstram is raw and error-prone.
Don't suppose Barks will figure, which casts a doubt on Jose's perception of who can and can't, especially if he prefers Zenjov!!! |
Do not underestimate Perkins.
 | | | |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 13:03 - Sep 27 with 1156 views | Seasider91 |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 12:39 - Sep 27 by Osbourne |
Do not underestimate Perkins.
|
I would drop Lundstram. Too inconsistent yet for my liking. |  |
| "We shall take baby steps up the league" Ian Holloway in July 2009 |
| |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 14:59 - Sep 27 with 1129 views | AlfHooker |
| Drop Lundstram or Perkins for Cubero? on 11:49 - Sep 27 by spooner |
Think we're all expecting too much from Cubero too soon.
Temperature, pace of the game, untried at Championship level, quality of those around him AND the opposition.
We're setting him up to fail, I fear.
Having said that, Perks has the determination, but is predictable, Lundstram is raw and error-prone.
Don't suppose Barks will figure, which casts a doubt on Jose's perception of who can and can't, especially if he prefers Zenjov!!! |
From what I saw of the in house game yesterday it looked like Barks was playing centre half marking Miller. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
