Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum
Reply
Official site
at 22:07 12 Mar 2015

So the question about anyone spotting anything else on the website was genuine? A website that you have clearly been on. Why would you need to ask anyone what they have seen, it's there for you to see yourself?

You have some cracking ideas 442Dale but the tone in which you raise certain issues does not represent well and comes across as condescending at times.

Just come out and say you feel there have been a lack of stories, rather than dressing it up as a question for the MB.
[Post edited 12 Mar 2015 22:08]
Forum
Reply
Official site
at 21:45 12 Mar 2015

Both yourself and TVOS know exactly what you are doing. It's not the actual process of raising these questions. It's the manner in which you do it.

Smug and patronising and with the purpose of raising your message board profile and perception whilst undermining certain people within the club.

Glad 100notout finally called it.
Forum
Reply
Official site
at 21:22 12 Mar 2015

Well called 100notout.

Same as 442Dale's opening post. Little digs at the club/trust where possible.
Forum
Thread
Engerland
at 21:51 15 Nov 2013

I know it's a friendly but what an awful game.

Despite the obvious difference in opposition our movement and passing puts this lot to shame!

Forum
Reply
Graham Cummins
at 19:16 3 Sep 2013

Surely then he will fit into a 'general team' or I have I missed the point here?

Anyway what's Jonathan Forte doing these days?
Forum
Reply
A Chesterfield Fans View..
at 13:27 18 Aug 2013

Out of interest can any Chesterfield fans enlighten us to what wage Roberts is on?
Forum
Reply
Back in car
at 20:43 10 Aug 2013

Highlights should be on Sky Sports News before 9. 'Todays Goals Now' - it's like the FLS but unfortunately no Mr Claridge and his biro

EDIT - didn't show card. Looked like Lanashire slid in and popped it past Lillis
[Post edited 10 Aug 2013 20:56]
Forum
Reply
New kit pics are on twitter, modelled by Rhys
at 14:00 17 Jun 2013

I fully understand the point regarding revenue and could have articulated my point with more clarity.

The point still remains that some will like it and some won't.

I haven't bought a top since centenary season but will be doing this year.



Forum
Reply
New kit pics are on twitter, modelled by Rhys
at 11:47 15 Jun 2013

And that last point 442Dale is why this messageboard is interesting to someone like me who is normally a mere observer.

I agree with many of your points 442Dale and you often have excellent solutions and suggestions.

A lot of the time however it seems like you have an agenda and simply criticise whenever, wherever and whoever you can - just an opinion like.
Forum
Reply
New kit pics are on twitter, modelled by Rhys
at 11:24 15 Jun 2013

Why will we miss out on a 'large' portion?

Just because people on here voice a dislike doesn't mean the rest of the fans who don't post on here agree.

There's 10 or so people on here who don't like it. I have spoke to 10 or so other Dale fans who don't post on here who do like it.

Whatever the club did the usuals would have found some way to have a pop and general moan.(As stated before I do agree with some of these moans as certain areas of the club are in need of serious improvement)

Kit sales will be at a similar as they are every year, some people will like a kit and some people won't.


[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
Forum
Reply
New kit pics are on twitter, modelled by Rhys
at 10:53 15 Jun 2013

Talk about drama.

442Dale as always whinging and having a pop wherever possible about anything he can. (Nit picking about percentages FFS!)

People complaining that the sponsor is on the shirt is in the colour that the sponsor would want it to be.

Yes the club could have taken a better approach to this (and most things in general) but the kit isn't as bad as everyone is making out. Had we gone for Bournemouths kit in our colours I guarantee people would complain we had just copied that design.

If you don't want to buy the kit then don't but bear in mind that this is less revenue for the club.

Typical case of the usual few who seem to think they speak for the majority of Dale fans and that their opinion is more worthy.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
Forum
Reply
Its still all Keiths fault
at 22:58 17 Apr 2013

No you've polluted it
Forum
Reply
Its still all Keiths fault
at 22:40 17 Apr 2013

So now you don't care about Wilson? Make your mind up!

And think about it, Keith has failed once. Wilson more than once therefore it's quite clear he's failed more often.

But we are little Rochdale what do we know.

Forum
Reply
Its still all Keiths fault
at 22:36 17 Apr 2013

Surely our opinions aren't invalid just because we haven't experienced him as a manager.

Differing opinions are exactly that, not invalid just different for whatever reason right or wrong!
Forum
Reply
Its still all Keiths fault
at 22:28 17 Apr 2013

Is Keith dining out as much on that promotion as much as Danny and his LMA manager of the year award? He's done fook all since really has Mr Wilson
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
Forum
Reply
Its still all Keiths fault
at 22:26 17 Apr 2013

As always you seem to miss the point.

You're more than welcome to harbour these negative feelings to our Keef and yes as sad as it is bringing them onto our messageboard. It's when you start with the patronising comments.

Do us all a favour Whitey, go and make some little YouTube clips of 'Sir Bobby of Hassel' clapping at fans.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
Forum
Reply
Its still all Keiths fault
at 22:04 17 Apr 2013

At least you've made it nice and clear why most people on here think your a bit of a c*ck Whitey.


Youre on a League 2 teams messageboard most of the time so you shouldn't have too much of a problem adjusting to life below your ever so high and rightful place in the football pyramid.

[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
Forum
Reply
Contracts
at 17:03 24 Mar 2013

That's irrelevant and it's not about a club withholding a players registration. It's to try and protect the whole point of the transfer window.

Players who are out of contract and do not have a club, can be signed outside of the transfer window if they are unattached free agents when the window closes.

Clubs still get around this with the whole ''loan with a view to permanent' thing.
Forum
Reply
Contracts
at 23:07 23 Mar 2013

Pretty sure that a player has to be a free agent (with no club holding their registration) when the transfer window is open for them to sign for a club outside of a transfer window.


Forum
Reply
Match thread
at 22:53 19 Mar 2013

Not 100% true, Grant ran over to Frampton and had a little push/niggle from behind. Frampton then turned round and kicked off
Please log in to use all the site's facilities

Stockyhargreave


Site Scores

Forum Votes: 0
Comment Votes: 0
Prediction League: 0
TOTAL: 0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024