| Hooper deal close? 11:03 - Jul 16 with 26150 views | qprdan |
David McIntyre â€@davidmcintyre76 29m
Looks like #QPR are pretty close with Hooper now.
Collapse | | | |  |
| Hooper deal close? on 11:06 - Jul 16 with 10369 views | QPR442 |
Harry just said it wasn't that close and depends on Celtic and if they take our offer. | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 11:09 - Jul 16 with 10340 views | RblockPrior |
apparently its pretty much done and he will be a QPR player by Thurs | |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 11:12 - Jul 16 with 10306 views | kingsburyR |
Dave Mc is pretty reliable........ isn't he? | |
| Dont know why we bother. .... but we do! |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 11:15 - Jul 16 with 10283 views | Stanisgod |
Dave.mac 76 @ p*ssedoffwithalltheserumoursshutthef&ckuptilitsfact.com  | |
| It's being so happy that keeps me going. |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 11:20 - Jul 16 with 10251 views | PinnerPaul |
More reliable than a direct quote from Harry?!!!!!!  | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 11:20 - Jul 16 with 10253 views | daveB |
i'd say he gets it right 70% of the time which is pretty good | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 12:16 - Jul 16 with 10005 views | QPR442 |
Probably told his old mates at the beeb.
| | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 12:21 - Jul 16 with 9953 views | Jamie |
Naaaarwich. | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 12:21 - Jul 16 with 9950 views | daveB |
they use west london sport as a source at the bbc, it's often quoted on the sportsday update | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 12:22 - Jul 16 with 9945 views | danehoop |
Turned us down before hadn't he? | |
| Never knowingly understood |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 12:24 - Jul 16 with 9922 views | rsonist |
If anything Hooper's people are probably the ones telling the media and drawing it out longer in a last minute bid to force Norwich's hand. If it's only about a million extra I still suspect they will buckle. | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 12:31 - Jul 16 with 9870 views | FDC |
Are you being serious? | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 12:38 - Jul 16 with 9810 views | eastside_r |
I think when Celtic turned down Norwich’s offers last season, Hooper had been amenable to joining them, but it was Celtic who refused the offers not the player.
I believe their first offer was £5m and an improved offer was also rejected by Celtic.
Thing is, his contract is up next summer, so this reduces Celtic’s bargaining position.
| | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 12:55 - Jul 16 with 9690 views | daveB |
If Norwich stump up the money he'll be off to them but I'm not sure they will as they just spent big on that Dutch striker | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:02 - Jul 16 with 9634 views | RANGERS4EVER |
I don't understand why Norwich need him, they have enough options already so i can't see them spending big on another Striker | |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:28 - Jul 16 with 9468 views | essextaxiboy |
We have upped the bid apparently | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:32 - Jul 16 with 9428 views | JonDoeman |
Better than Jamie anyway! | |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:42 - Jul 16 with 9371 views | RblockPrior |
Think alot of R's fans have set alot of hopes on Hooper already | |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:43 - Jul 16 with 9352 views | barbicanranger |
Agreed, and probably myself included in that, can't help but think Hooper in will be quickly followed by Remy out. | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:50 - Jul 16 with 9268 views | MedwayR |
If Hooper signs, and Remy stays, would that work as a partnership?
If so, they would surely score plenty in the Championship & possibly provide us with a ready-made frontline for the Prem if we went up... | |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:52 - Jul 16 with 9280 views | essextaxiboy |
If we sold Remy first , The price for Hooper would go up . | | | |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:54 - Jul 16 with 9269 views | WeaverQPR |
I would laugh my nuts off if we signed Hooper, sold Remy to Toon who then gets sent down. Having already been snubbed once they sign him and he is jailed later on. | |
| |
| Hooper deal close? on 13:58 - Jul 16 with 9234 views | barbicanranger |
hard to tell as they both appear to be #9 type players rather than one of them being a typical #10, regardless you would imagine that they would produce some serious fire power for the division...remy's pace alone would put many cham'hp defenses into a lot of bother.
| | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
