| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! 16:02 - Nov 24 with 2219 views | Loomesy |
What a great effort so far and Clint Hill yet again proving everyone else wrong!
Love the bloke!!
We are hunting things down not giving them any time in the important areas!!! | | | |  |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:04 - Nov 24 with 2205 views | FDC |
This is a different team to the one that played S'ampton though - I mean different players. | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:06 - Nov 24 with 2194 views | Loomesy |
True 5 in total but even the ones that are, are trying much harder and clearly following Hills, mackie etc lead | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:06 - Nov 24 with 2192 views | hoopsa07 |
Which makes me even more annoyed about our perfoormance in the Southampton game but anyway onwards and upwards | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:07 - Nov 24 with 2186 views | EalingRanger |
Not sure whether to be annoyed that we haven't performed like this all season or happy that we should kick on and improve from here on. | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:07 - Nov 24 with 2186 views | QPR1882 |
/
THIS | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:09 - Nov 24 with 2161 views | TacticalR |
It doesn't show 'they didn't want to play for Hughes', it only shows that Hughes didn't know what he was doing, and was a complete and utter nonentity as a manager. | |
| |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:10 - Nov 24 with 2152 views | FDC |
Be intrigued to know if this is Bowen's team or Hughes' | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:10 - Nov 24 with 2149 views | Loomesy |
Yeh fair point but still happier right now and gives me the renewed hope i had at the start of the season!!
Arry's blue n white army!!! | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:23 - Nov 24 with 2106 views | HollowayRanger |
CLINT HILL'S not proving everyone wrong
i think the majority of us would have him in front of anton and alongside nelsen
if hughes had keep hill with nelsen i think we would have been much much stronger this season
and before anyone asks mbia should be in the middle of midfield in the patrick viera role | |
| |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 16:30 - Nov 24 with 2093 views | westberksr |
pretty much this (no comment on M'Bia yet)
Derry, Hill, Mackie, Dyer and Faurlin always put in a shift to add to Taraabt and Nelsen.
Hughes picked the wrong team. | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 17:06 - Nov 24 with 2030 views | Juzzie |
If 'player power' was part of the reason why we are where we are, they're going to have to put in an almighty shift in the rest of the games to sort out our league position.
| | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 17:07 - Nov 24 with 2018 views | FDC |
To answer my own question, from WLS:
"Redknapp inherits a struggling side from Mark Hughes, whose team selection — made before he was fired on Friday morning — reflected the Welshman’s desire to get back to basics with the help of Rangers’ most trusted players." | | | |
| Clearly shows they didn't want to play for Hughes! on 17:09 - Nov 24 with 2003 views | kropotkin41 |
I'll have an early shot at predicting our player of the season, if he plays enough games, go down or stay up: Mr Clint Hill!!
| |
| ‘morbid curiosity about where this is all going’ |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
