| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no 10:58 - Oct 28 with 11098 views | ingeminate |
No
------------------------------------------------
Update roughly added up I make it
71 No's
18 Yes's
Another chap has a few less yesses and my internet kept freezing so he may well be right. Plus I didn't look out for double voters and think included the Fulham ones who predictably voted 'no', but it is there or thereabouts.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| |
| |  |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 17:11 - Oct 29 with 994 views | duperhoop |
yes,
i reckon the time has come.
in the words of the great joe strummer,"if i go there will be trouble, but if i stay it
will be double" [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| | | |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- as in today. Just yes or no on 17:53 - Oct 29 with 981 views | Fulhamjim |
That'd do :)
Seriously though, all my rangers mates (well, both of them) want him gone.
As with Fulham, thinks he is bigger and better than where he is.
Found out yet again | |
| Nothing like a bit of Am6iti0n |
| |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 03:42 - Oct 30 with 937 views | QPR_ARG |
Yes | | | |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 04:08 - Oct 30 with 930 views | Kiwi76 |
No - will change in 3 games if still bottom though... | | | |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 04:38 - Oct 30 with 929 views | DylanP |
No | |
| |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 08:00 - Oct 30 with 916 views | paesanu |
No
| |
| |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 11:59 - Oct 31 with 891 views | toboboly |
No but 6 points from the next 9 or it'll be yes. | |
| Sexy Asian dwarves wanted. |
| |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 12:36 - Oct 31 with 882 views | RangersAreBack |
I've always maintained that the position should be looked at after our home match with Southampton on November 17th. If we haven't accrued at least 6 points from the next 3 matches he should be replaced , assuming there's an adequate replacement available. This will give the new manager enough time to make an impact before the busy Christmas and New Year schedule, and to identify January transfer window targets. The problem that the board faces is that there is a very good alternative available now but no guarantees he still will be in 3 weeks time. | | | |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 13:08 - Oct 31 with 874 views | QPunkR |
Err... Mick Jones, not Joe Strummer | |
| |
| Poll. Do you want Hughes sacked instantly- Just yes or no - update about 80% say no on 14:31 - Oct 31 with 869 views | duperhoop |
you are completely right,
what an oversight on my part!!! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
