Reading chant 22:51 - Jul 13 with 3447 views | hoopsa07 | We need something that points out they stole our kit... A bit random sorry [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| | | | |
Reading chant on 22:57 - Jul 13 with 3430 views | queensparker | Not only our kit, our songs as well. 'Come On You Rs'??? Really? The irritating little brothers from down the road | | | |
Reading chant on 22:59 - Jul 13 with 3420 views | actonman | how about..... you pikey inbred chunts, why dont you fcuk and find your own identity and make up your own songs la la la | | | |
Reading chant on 23:34 - Jul 13 with 3385 views | calders | They used to call themselves the biscuit men, and then changed to the royals, and now call themselves the rzzzz, what they gonna call themselves next. The irons. Face painted, foam handed bunch of plastic kunts the lot of them. | | | |
Reading chant on 23:36 - Jul 13 with 3380 views | Billy_Kershaw | And our players! Illegitwood and Gorrks.... | |
| |
Reading chant on 00:00 - Jul 14 with 3363 views | barbicanranger | to the theme of "your grounds too big for you": You are our feeder club... | | | |
Reading chant on 00:06 - Jul 14 with 3356 views | ade_qpr | To live up to their fake id, may be some thing based on a Milli Vanilli song? | |
| If a turtle doesn't have a shell, is he homeless or naked? |
| |
Reading chant on 00:16 - Jul 14 with 3344 views | michael67 | How about we just ignore them. Are they really relevant? Hardly rivals, not even greater London. Maybe they just get semi's thinking that we really give a toss over them, their kit, songs and anything else. Reading, you're history. We have got bigger fish to fry. | |
| |
Reading chant on 00:29 - Jul 14 with 3335 views | bosh67 | How about to the tune of 'Taarabt's too good for you' We respect your manager Some of your players did a job for us Your kit's not got as many hoops as ours Apart from that we've got no beef with you. Your players don't sleep with other player's wives Or get embroiled with alleged racial slurs Can't think of anything else right now That's it, have a nice day. .... What? ... Too much? | |
| |
Reading chant on 07:16 - Jul 14 with 3284 views | loftboy | Two hoops, you've only got two hoops | |
| |
Reading chant on 07:33 - Jul 14 with 3272 views | ElHoop | How about 'Stolen Identity'' repeated to the tune of Taarabt's Too Good For You? | | | |
Reading chant on 07:50 - Jul 14 with 3261 views | hoopstilidie | So at least 62 and as much as 81 (missing 19 years on that chart) of Reading's 141 year history has been played in kits other than hooped. 47 years straight in stripes right after their 1 inaugural year in some very narrow hoops. Longest continual period in hoops 27 years. QPR - continually blue & white hooped for the last 53 years, blue & white hoops for 52 of the previous 59 years, green & white hoops for the preceding 34 years and halved shirts for the initial 10 years of our existence. We were wearing blue & white hoops for 12 years before Reading went back to wearing them for the first time since the opening year of their existence. Spot the hoops. http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Reading/Reading.htm http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Queens_Park_Rangers/Queens_Park_Rangers.htm P.S. Ours have always gone all the way round. [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
| |
| |
Reading chant on 08:20 - Jul 14 with 3239 views | elnombre | I seem to remember stripes on the so-called 'millenium' (99? 2000?) Ericsson kit didn't go all the way round? Stand to be corrected as it's one of the few shirts I didn't buy (for that very reason, I think). | | | |
Reading chant on 08:31 - Jul 14 with 3226 views | hoopstilidie | All the way round | |
| |
Reading chant on 09:13 - Jul 14 with 3197 views | elnombre | that's the one after I think. | | | |
Reading chant on 09:20 - Jul 14 with 3189 views | hoopstilidie | That had white mesh down the sides and a kind of disc on the back for number but the hoops were still on the back as you can see on Kiwomya | |
| |
Reading chant on 09:36 - Jul 14 with 3167 views | elnombre | Hmm, I'm not convinced the top bar does join up, however that would still make it 'a' hoop and not 'hoops'. Shoddy dereliction of a shirt however you look at it. I think that's the only one I'm missing since the Brooks kit, so I must have been bitter about it! | | | |
Reading chant on 09:52 - Jul 14 with 3142 views | hoopstilidie | I know what you mean, it's amazing as fans just how precious we can get about a shirt | |
| |
| |