By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
After the CV questions. there is now a bit of a flap about Rachel Reeves' "Who's Who" entry. Following a Times investigation it seems that this repeats the incorrect information about the length of time she worked at the Bank of England, and also contains a misleading claim to a prestigious journal publication. This is perhaps not the greatest of sins, but would have been considered very naughty if she had been applying for an academic post.
It was true. And everything that has been said about Reeves appears to be too.
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back.
0
More fibs from Rachel? on 21:16 - Feb 20 with 868 views
Darling was nicknamed 'Red Ally' after Kinnock allegedly pointed him out as a threat from the left of the party Rachel from accounts is nothing unusual in the context of previous nicknames unless you are a fully paid up member of the outrage everywhere club.
Yes to a point, but the Rachel from Accounts tag is deliberate and to remind her/others that whatever she achieves in life she will always be just a nobody.
Its a term laced with both misogyny and snobbery.
If Rachel made it her deliberate lifes work she would still not fall to the poor standards of recent Tory failures.
Beware of the Risen People
0
More fibs from Rachel? on 13:50 - Feb 21 with 535 views
Your first paragraph makes no sense, the nickname has come from her embellishment of her CV, and her budget and other financial decisions have been pretty poor so far
I fail to see how it's misogyny Rachel is her name, and another favourite of yours Liz Truss was christened Lettuce, it's not misogyny it's saying it like it is
You give it out, you take it back it`s all part of the game
We will have to agree to disagree, Rachel from accounts could be the manager of the accounts department.
Are you honestly happy with her embellishments and record so far, not to mention her hammering of clothes expenses at the same time as she cancelled the wfa.
I had high hopes for her when she was in opposition, but she's been a massive disappointment already
You give it out, you take it back it`s all part of the game
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
