| Sam Field or no Sam Field? 14:01 - Dec 8 with 6465 views | QPR_Pro_Max |
Though young and inexperienced, Varane and Morgan were making a big difference by more willing to carry the ball forward and making forward passes. While Field will 90% making backward passes or sideway passes if he is on the pitch. With such a negative style of play, it will definitely slow down the team’s overall movement and bring pressure to the defence or even creates chaos in our own half by inviting opponents immediate attack.
This passive mindset was one of the major reasons for the team’s low confidence to move forward and lack of attacking threat (toothless) for the last few months.
Varane and Morgan are the better midfielder combination for our success and very good saleable asset prospects by giving them more playing time.
Field is a good defensive player when we need to see out a game. | | | |  |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 12:43 - Dec 9 with 2160 views | BAWHoops |
I thought Varane suffered for not having Field alongside him Saturday. Felt the game passed Morgan by and when we pressed high up it left Varane with tons of space to cover.
Thought Norwich got runners off him loads in the first half (much better second half).
Morgan has great potential, but realistically it needs to be Field and Varane in there at the base | |
| http://blogandwhitehoops.wordpress.com/ |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 18:57 - Dec 11 with 1918 views | DTIG |
Anything to get Madsen out of the starting 11. He literally offers nothing. Doesn't tackle, doesn't win headers, doesn't track back...generally hides. Yes, given 20 yards of room he can spray a pass 30 yards out to the wings...but so can I at 58 years old! | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:13 - Dec 11 with 1788 views | eghamranger |
Definitely Sam Field | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:44 - Dec 11 with 1754 views | Hunterhoop |
Drink it in. | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:47 - Dec 11 with 1731 views | Leaftree |
This aged like milk | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:51 - Dec 11 with 1673 views | robith |
Ye of little faith | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:52 - Dec 11 with 1666 views | Tonto |
I would go with Sam Field. Gut feeling. | |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:54 - Dec 11 with 1642 views | SimonJames |
 | |
| 100% of people who drink water will die. |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:58 - Dec 11 with 1577 views | Lblock |
Yeah…… about those goals needed
Take
A
Bow
Sir | |
| Cherish and enjoy life.... this ain't no dress rehearsal |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:59 - Dec 11 with 1562 views | Benny_the_Ball |
No need to start a survey. | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 22:04 - Dec 11 with 1493 views | BrianMcCarthy |
We all knew what QPR-Pro-Max was saying.
And I can see why the question was asked. It's been discussed on here a million times.
No harm, Pro-Max. | |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 22:23 - Dec 11 with 1377 views | LazyFan |
As predicted :P | |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 22:46 - Dec 11 with 1257 views | qpr_1968 |
sam field.....full stop. | |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 08:46 - Dec 12 with 1022 views | gazza1 |
Well done Sam Field, how any supporter/poster thinks Field is a 'non starter' is sheer naivety. He is the most solid DCM in the Club and a big asset to the Team & he showed that last night. Took his goals very well indeed. | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 09:48 - Dec 12 with 900 views | QPR_Jim |
I was going to say that he reads danger really well, showed that against Watford with some great interceptions. But he also showed last night that when the opposition is weaker and we're on the front foot he can be an asset in attack as well. | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 10:07 - Dec 12 with 834 views | golborne |
He is playing a different role currently. A role all previous managers have tried and ultimately switched back for whatever reason.
He is playing the more attacking of the two, due mostly because of his basic control of a football. He can’t be trusted to play in the deep role, as that requires a player to be able to collect and move the ball forward quickly. When he’s there the ball often goes straight back and not always in a precise way.
Last night in the first half the game passed him by in that role. Verane seemed to be playing both roles. Half time comes, Marty has a word and Field pushes further forward to where he’s supposed to be and he ends up playing a huge role in turning the game, goals aside. Was doing similar in the first half vs Watford and was the driver in the great play that lead to the Madsons chance. Verane is now the first on the team sheet in midfield, playing the deeper role. Field just needs to be consistent in the role he’s now being asked to play and he’ll start most games. I can’t watch the giraffe trying to trap a balloon situations we too often see in precarious situations that don’t allow for error. At best we end up with a pass going straight back where it came from. His control is better in stride. | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 13:06 - Dec 12 with 666 views | CLAREMAN1995 |
Clive has been talking about this for a year or so I think saying Field should be scoring way more even close to double digits so maybe its finally happening.
Normally his second goal would have ended up outside in the road but he slammed it low into the corner like a seasoned striker.
His misses have cost us so far but if he keeps scoring a goal every few games it would be massive for us .His heart and passion is undeniable its easy to see why every QPR manager loves him. | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 13:34 - Dec 12 with 592 views | TheChef |
Have to say I don't recall him missing many? | |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 13:42 - Dec 12 with 536 views | QuillPenRiot |
Nice analysis, very much agree with this! Field needs to be that 8 if we’re to have an effective midfield that links forward. Madsen did better too because of it, who seems to be positionallymopportunistic instead of a driver of playmaking (or press, though he’s gradually improving there). Varane does have that dribbling ability to push forward from back, good call on that, and Field’s sense of defense allows him to cover or assist the drive as needed | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
