| Why? Why can't people see it's the owners who need removing? 21:25 - Oct 23 with 6687 views | Southamptonfan |
Threads titled as astonishing and why is he still here?
Do people seriously think that the owners who appointed Jones and Selles, who bought a load of Man City reserves and Villa reserve players for PL failure, all to do it on the cheap, are going to spend tens of millions sacking a manager and then replacing him with a better manager (and if he's better he would want a lot more than RM wanted?). This is the same ownership team that could have appointed Dyche after Ralph, they could have appointed some decent managers instead of Jones and Selles. When is the penny going to drop, that the owners are the problem here?
If RM goes, these owners will koto attract a top manager to save us. The team isn't good enough for a start and a top manager would want money to spend on top.players. never going to happen under these owners. | |
| |  |
| Why? Why can't people see it's the owners who need removing? on 17:27 - Oct 24 with 803 views | PatfromPoole |
I fail to see how the business makes any money at all if the Club is mid-table in the Championship.
Nobody in the Championship makes any money. | |
| |
| Why? Why can't people see it's the owners who need removing? on 18:20 - Oct 24 with 759 views | SpitMk9 |
Well said !!!! Unfortunately true. | | | |
| Why? Why can't people see it's the owners who need removing? on 19:37 - Oct 24 with 698 views | Ifonly |
That's right, in 22/23 which is the latest year available, only 1 Championship club made a profit. That was Watford, they made a profit because they sold off their PL players after they were relegated the previous season. That's obviously a one-off, you can't do that year after year.
So, it's nonsense to say that SR have a business plan of being a mid table Championship club. Also, If that's what they wanted, they would have bought a mid-table Championship club, or a League 1 club that they could build up. They wouldn't have planned to buy a PL club and run it down.
I don't have a problem with SR from a money point of view. They have invested a lot. Where they have gone wrong is that their football decisions have been moronic so the money has been wasted. The evidence suggests that is down to Ankersen and if Dragan can push him out or sideline him, I'd be prepared to give them another chance. | | | |
| Why? Why can't people see it's the owners who need removing? on 07:02 - Oct 25 with 624 views | Berber |
Fulham (and Crystal Palace) are an easy option for good players at top London clubs to move on without a major disruption to their lives, so they get a higher standard of players truly available to them. But you are right about Brighton, Brentford and Bournemouth. I think Bournemouth are very much in the drop down and bounce back group, which is where I suspect Sports Republic are happy for us to be, and if we hang on in the PL for a couple of years, then that is a bonus. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
