By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Interesting, Sky have put together a league table from the last 50 years of the game and have us at 11th in the list.
Weirdly given they're such a MASSSSIVE club and clearly the biggest, hugeest, most pashooonist club in the world the skates are 37th.
This surely can't be right given that would make them perennial lower league fodder and not the glaticos of the south coast that we are so often told they are?
I acknowledged and stated the 27th on the list and the -313 goal difference which were both on tables presented by yourself. Yet you haven't acknowledged those facts yourself.
Also, I seem to remember you saying that you werent old enough to know anything about the FA cup win, so I tried adjusting the timescales for you ie firstly this centrury, then 40 years, then 45 year. But you just seem to want to go back to 50 years some for unknown reason.
I am frankly not surprised that you fail to understand that the conversation being had was one based on the original table produced by the television company Sky Sports, it does seem you have some difficulties with understanding things.
Perhaps these cognitive dissonances are the reason that you keep trying to change the subject?
Could i perhaps suggest you look into reading lessons? It would save you so much time in your day and stop you feeling the need to set up new straw men.
I'm eager to hear of your progress, both on this front and the counselling for your insecurities.
I can’t wait to see what you accomplish next,
FT
0
League table for the last 50 years on 15:14 - Feb 15 with 1420 views
So basically 130, to sum up briefly, over the last 50 years (or anyone alive today) Pompey have mainly been lower league fodder, playing generally in front of a half full stadiums and have won (cheated) the the same amount of domestic honours as their neighbours who have spent most seasons playing the top teams in the country in the best league in the World. Correct?
1
League table for the last 50 years on 21:34 - Feb 15 with 1222 views
So, basically in the most successful part of your history ie the last 50 years, we have spent around half of the time in the Championship level, but crucially have won one FA cup, just like your club
Of course, we also won the Championship, so we have outdone you on trophies.
So, we have out-performed you on trophies in the least successful part of our clubs history. I think that says a lot
Winning the championship means a year spent not being in the top division, I guess in that case you have had a lot more opportunities to win the championship/lower divisions than we have. If you are counting competitions that really don’t matter we won the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy, but I think we have a bit too much pride to celebrate that, guess you have to be a mediocre club from a crap place to celebrate the small wins.
0
League table for the last 50 years on 11:00 - Feb 16 with 1054 views
Gotta be in it to win it I guess, 1 Championship win from 25 pokes, you never counted winning the 3rd and 4th divs in the 18 seasons in the bottom 2 leagues, same tinpot?
Open Top bus parade for winning the second Division Only in Pompey, embarrassing.
0
League table for the last 50 years on 11:39 - Feb 16 with 993 views
Not very good at keeping on the topic are you. My response was to your comment about the last fifty years and this page is about the last fifty years but you change it to a far larger period.
In the last fifty years Saints have spent: 38 years in the top division 10 years in the second 2 years in the third
In that time you have spent: 8 years in the top division 23 years in the second 13 years in the third 6 years in the fourth.
So yes you have had over double the opportunities to win a division that in order to win you have had to not been good enough to be in the division above before! Not much of an achievement, the season you won the championship we were in the division above so your supposed moment of glory was a title that shows you were worse than us!
Now you might not to get a few of your friends heads together to do this maths (I know they smell but just hold your nose) but you have not spent as many years in the top two divisions as we have in the top division in the last 50 years. Little bit of a hint but 23 plus 8 is less than 38, even giving you a whole extra league to try and even the numbers and you are behind us!
0
League table for the last 50 years on 11:56 - Feb 16 with 949 views
Well, lets just hope you don't get promoted this season, cos there is no way you will ever win the PL ie you had 38 attempts, and they were all failures.
Best concentrate on the 2nd tier, and be successful
BTW - We only ever had 33 top flight opportunities, but we took two of them
Picking people up on spelling misakes is always a bit weak, especially if the accuser hasn't been on the thread previously.
If he had only looked at the OP, he would have seen that FT 'mispelled' this word with exageration, and if he had bothered to check - I was answering FT with my 'mispelling' ie the accuser has been a bit slow ie retarded
You now, have come on this thread with your holier than though/ woke accusation without understanding the thread or the context. Well done
Your logic is incredibly flawed, explains why you guys regularly drop to the third and fourth tiers, you seem to think winning those are more impressive than playing in the top tier. Maybe you guys should go yo-yo between National league and national league south and then you could be rivals with Eastleigh? More your sort of level and you could get all those glorious league titles!
0
League table for the last 50 years on 13:25 - Feb 16 with 867 views
According to the Cambridge Dictionary the term "retard" is "a word for a person with a learning disability (= a condition that can have an effect on someone's ability to learn easily), which was used by doctors in the past but is now extremely offensive". It's not holier than thou or woke to pick someone up on that - it's just decent.
You've clearly been a bit agitated by this criticism because your last sentence has one grammatical error (no comma after now) and one spelling mistake (though for thou). Maybe try to understand the modern usage of language and calm down a bit before posting?