Aldershot match thread 14:50 - Nov 18 with 12456 views | 442Dale | White socks. | |
| | |
Aldershot match thread on 11:47 - Nov 20 with 1490 views | EllDale | I obviously enjoyed Mitchell's winner but, having seen the highlights, I suspect that there would have been a real commotion on here if Dale had conceded that goal. Not so much because of the way in which Clayton's cross was defended but rather due to the fact that he was left totally unmarked as the corner routine was worked. And, going back to the start of the thread, I thought we looked better with white socks..... | | | |
Aldershot match thread on 12:54 - Nov 20 with 1355 views | 49thseason | Maybe tomorrow night, we will go the whole hog and wear white shorts as well as white socks....you know the saying .. " wear something white at night" .. its so that you can easily be seen in poor lighting conditions...and maybe make it easier to pick out a pass....? | | | |
Aldershot match thread on 13:22 - Nov 20 with 1276 views | D_Alien | It's absolutely to do with how we defend out of possession, the instructions for which are linked to our possession-based style in terms of positioning. It'd be wrong if they weren't! All previous references have related to "crosses" in general (especially your longer post in another thread) rather than conceding from corners - of course that's an issue [Post edited 20 Nov 2023 13:24]
| |
| |
Aldershot match thread on 13:42 - Nov 20 with 1233 views | 442Dale | The white socks were already available after their necessity for the game at Solihull Moors. There’s also a long history of randomly wearing white socks being successful. But that’s a whole new thread. I’d keep the white socks too, it looks better. The club have been previously informed that having too much black on the kit is a mistake. | |
| |
Aldershot match thread on 14:34 - Nov 20 with 1158 views | AtThePeake | Yep sorry, I meant crosses not corners. | |
| |
Aldershot match thread on 14:41 - Nov 20 with 1150 views | D_Alien | Fair enough | |
| |
| |