| Eze on 11:54 - Aug 24 with 4538 views | Hoopstar |
I dislike seeing Eze referreed to as a winger like that Beeb article, he's so much more than that. | | |  |
| Eze on 12:00 - Aug 24 with 4457 views | CateLeBonR |
Apparently for most transfers, sell on fees are taken from the profits. The story with Eze was that we had higher offers from elsewhere but he wanted to go Palace. So we accepted a lower offer and negotiated a good percentage of the whole transfer, should they sell him.
No idea if it’s 20% or 25% or even if it’s true but that was the story i think. [Post edited 24 Aug 2023 12:01]
| | | |
| Eze on 12:06 - Aug 24 with 4408 views | enfieldargh |
as mentioned earlier in the thread its a full % not just the profit.
No I dont often read all the way through either | |
| |
| Eze on 12:51 - Aug 24 with 4109 views | PlanetHonneywood |
I wonder if there's any scope for QPR to offer Palace an option to buy-out the clause? | |
| |
| Eze on 13:03 - Aug 24 with 3977 views | Benny_the_Ball |
Easy to see why when you see what's been spent on Caicedo, Rice and the bang average Mason Mount. | | | |
| Eze on 13:10 - Aug 24 with 3952 views | Padulas_Shampoo |
Mount is nowhere near as good as average. He’ll be playing for Everton within 3 years. | | | |
| Eze on 13:59 - Aug 24 with 3682 views | Match82 |
Now you mention it, that's spot on. Mount is about the most Everton player possible. | | | |
| Eze on 14:21 - Aug 24 with 3567 views | Pikey |
Presumably our former Director of Football negotiated that bonus for us. Hope he gets the credit but probably won't.
On another stream mention of Freeman who we sold at peak and gaz done nothing since, even though many thought wd understood him. Well done DOF. | | | |
| Eze on 14:33 - Aug 24 with 3507 views | Blue_Castello |
Sure it may have been Les but I think Lee Hoos deals with the contracts they are very complicated, could well have been a combination of both we will never know. | | | |
| Eze on 15:03 - Aug 24 with 3343 views | toboboly |
Or Watford | |
| Sexy Asian dwarves wanted. |
| |
| Eze on 15:51 - Aug 24 with 3116 views | QPRConor2000 |
Be interesting to see how we spend the £14m we potentially could get from Eze being sold if its 70m he goes for.
It wouldnt surprise me if City paid £100m for Eze ether, which would mean we get 20m. | | | |
| Eze on 16:11 - Aug 24 with 3027 views | NorthantsHoop |
If it all comes to pass exciting times for Eze, always had a feeling he would go to Spurs, but if Man City come in and meet Palace valuation the opportunity to work with Pep is something that Eze should take. He has the look of a City player. Great stuff for us as well with the sell on fee. In my opinion best player we had for many a year and a good attitude as well. | | | |
| Eze on 16:19 - Aug 24 with 2980 views | QPRConor2000 |
He definately will fit in well into Pep's style.
I think he could easily go for £100m if Man City are willing to pay that. | | | |
| Eze on 16:36 - Aug 24 with 2860 views | Juzzie |
I suspect a big chunk will go on stuff like FFP fine and other club costs. Some left over for signings but not much. | | | |
| Eze on 16:42 - Aug 24 with 2804 views | WokingR |
Doubt it.
At the moment he isn't signing a new contract so, if they don't sell him and he should leave on a free, they will have paid us for nothing. | | | |
| Eze on 16:57 - Aug 24 with 2733 views | Toast_R |
A bang average player demanding a great player's wage...
I think those days are now beyond Everton. | | | |
| Eze on 16:58 - Aug 24 with 2731 views | kensalriser |
Not sure that makes sense. The club's problem isn't cashflow but FFP restrictions. | |
| |
| Eze on 17:20 - Aug 24 with 2662 views | dmm |
Yup, the FFP fine was £17m, and payments are spread over 10 years between 2018-2027.
Keeping within the rolling 3 year maximum £39m loss is the problem. | | | |
| Eze on 17:27 - Aug 24 with 2603 views | HAYESBOY |
Knowing our luck, Eze sold to City within last hour of the window. | |
| Smells like a trout farm in here |
| |
| Eze on 17:28 - Aug 24 with 2596 views | QPRConor2000 |
FFP fine isn't included within the FFP calculations.
Assuming we are paying £1.7m per year from 2018 to 2027 without any interest, it would mean we still have to pay 6.8m between now and 2027. | | | |
| Eze on 17:32 - Aug 24 with 2567 views | Padulas_Shampoo |
Roughly speaking weren't we allowed to lose around £6-8m this year? Can't remember what the allowed three year rolling loss would have been for next year.
So if we got an additional £10m from Eze, we'd be allowed to lose £16-£18m this year as an extreme example. I say extreme because they'd obviously spread that £10m out across multiple seasons practically.
Or, of course... The board could decide that the extra £10m just goes against running costs, the budget doesn't change this year or next and we don't push FFP to the limit, in essence saving whoever is paying the bills a bit of cash.
If this does happen - it could be interesting to see how much they reinvest and how quickly. It would be our first chance to see how willing they are to keep spending their own money - over and above what they're already losing on this year's FFP constrained losses. Are they willing to let those losses get larger than FFP is already stipulating? Surely not something they'd do if they were looking at selling the club. | | | |
| Eze on 17:42 - Aug 24 with 2471 views | Benny_the_Ball |
That would be daft move as payment of the fine is excluded from FFP accounts. It's more likely to be used to keep the club under the FFP threshold next year when the original Eze fee rolls off the books, with a small chunk allocated to Gareth to strengthen the squad. | | | |
| Eze on 17:42 - Aug 24 with 2473 views | dmm |
I guess so but looking back on this, the owners stated they would pay the fine themselves and that it had no bearing on the club’s operational budget. However, I don't know how that would be expressed in the club's accounts. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
