| Bring back Stockdale! 15:17 - Aug 20 with 3611 views | True_blue |
Just as hopeless of a performance this, sack big Jim tonight and get Stockdale back in charge!! | | | |  |
| Bring back Stockdale! on 15:53 - Aug 20 with 3394 views | fourfourtwo |
Strange how you only appear to pop up and post when we sack a manager | | | |
| Bring back Stockdale! on 16:35 - Aug 20 with 3235 views | 442Dale |
Aye but some pop up an almost nick a username! Why the change anyway?! | |
| |
| Bring back Stockdale! on 16:41 - Aug 20 with 3185 views | kel |
You can’t trademark a name unless you’re a millionaire I’m afraid. | |
| “He was deliberately misleading the EFL” |
| |
| Bring back Stockdale! on 16:49 - Aug 20 with 3105 views | 442Dale |
Ok. But if anyone else starts a debate on why we continually wear yellow despite a) not needing to and b) the obvious lack of results wearing it, then that’s got to be worth going to small claims court? | |
| |
| Bring back Stockdale! on 17:11 - Aug 20 with 3011 views | TVOS1907 |
Why do these WUMs think they won't get sussed? | |
| If you don't know why your posts keep getting downvoted, there's no hope for you. |
| |
| Bring back Stockdale! on 17:54 - Aug 20 with 2870 views | kel |
They tend to give themselves up fairly quickly anyway, as demonstrated on the match thread. Or even after one post. | |
| “He was deliberately misleading the EFL” |
| |
| Bring back Stockdale! on 18:20 - Aug 20 with 2745 views | mikehunt |
Sadly, our enemies will be p!ssing themselves laughing â˜¹ï¸ | |
| The worm of time turns not for the cuckoo of circumstance. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
