| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread 13:00 - Aug 9 with 3851 views | 442Dale |
Saw something on twitter where Premier League teams are converted from squad numbers to the days of 1-11.
Rules: a player wearing any number 1-11 keeps that and others starting with a higher number have to convert it to those numbers left available. It’s probably a bit more weird than sock turnover colours, but it may create debate. Probably not.
Crewe H
1. O’Donnell
5. Graham; 6. Ebanks-Landell; 4. John
2. Seriki; 3. Diagouraga; 7. Kelly; 8 Ball; 11. Odoh
9. Henderson; 10. Rodney.
Gillingham A
1. O’Donnell
5. Graham; 6. Ebanks-Landell; 4. John
2. Seriki; 11. Diagouraga; 7. Kelly; 8 Ball; 3. White
9. Henderson; 10. Rodney. | |
| |  |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 14:32 - Aug 9 with 3686 views | blackdogblue |
That will hurt replica shirt printing sales for big clubs & cost small clubs a fortune every week unless they are dropping names?? | |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 15:09 - Aug 9 with 3599 views | DaleiLama |
For entertainment purposes only (I think)!
Saw this played once on a film too (I think)?  
 | |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 15:58 - Aug 9 with 3521 views | 442Dale |
Yes, it’s for entertainment. Mine. The twitter account shows it in much better light as they have kit graphics and who doesn’t like kit graphics?
Others may wish to have an opinion once we start using more players with higher squad numbers. I won’t actually be telling Dale to wear 1-11, but they should be. | |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 16:05 - Aug 9 with 3506 views | HullDale |
I saw this thread on twitter the other day & thought of you 442... I actually quite like some of these!
The Reeses design would look brilliant in our colours...
| | | |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 17:46 - Aug 9 with 3345 views | 442Dale |
It’s a good thread of kits. Wish we’d look more at other designs and think whether it’d suit our colours. Hopefully this will be capitalised on with the review of suppliers as mentioned at the forum.
Anyway, be interesting to see tonight’s 1-11… | |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 22:00 - Aug 9 with 3168 views | krafty80 |
According to the Beeb, young Kelly on the bench tonight wore squad number 99?! Please tell me that wasn't true. Game has *literally* gone... 😆 | | | |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 22:26 - Aug 9 with 3095 views | TVOS1907 |
I think he was 31, but I wasn't taking too much notice | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 22:34 - Aug 9 with 3045 views | 442Dale |
Burton H, League Cup.
1. Slicker
5. Nelson; 6. Ebanks-Landell; 4. John
2. Seriki; 3. Diagouraga; 8 Ball; 11. Odoh
7. Sinclair; 9 Tulloch
10. Rodney | |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 09:30 - Aug 11 with 2739 views | AtThePeake |
I thought it was 37. Either way, definitely not 99. | |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 10:14 - Aug 11 with 2674 views | boromat |
Maybe it was 37 I remember glancing at it and thinking that's a high number! Thought I saw 87 but 37 seems more reasonable. Do all players on YTS and the U16s get preliminary first team squad numbers assigned or only when they come to be in a first team squad? | |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 10:29 - Aug 11 with 2651 views | James1980 |
Sponsored by Mr Whippy | |
| |
| 1-11, squad numbers not allowed thread on 14:56 - Oct 8 with 1811 views | 442Dale |
Not done this for a while and maybe it’ll inspire a victory.
1. O’Donnell
2. Seriki, 5. Graham, 6. EEL, 3 Keohane
4. Diagouraga, 7. Kelly, 8. Ball
11. Odoh, 9. Quigley, 10. Rodney | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
