| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window 10:30 - Jan 30 with 11169 views | KeithHaynes |
Here’s hoping the talking will stop and the action starts. Russell Martin has hinted at late signings. But we all know one or two won’t fix it.
We have been talking for over a week to two players, one striker we approached two weeks ago seems a gonna. And of course the countless others we don’t know about. | |
| |  |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 10:42 - Jan 30 with 3694 views | guthrieintherain |
How many are we after then Keith and are they likely to be first teamers my feeling is the zero incoming on fees is going to hit us. | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 10:50 - Jan 30 with 3657 views | onehunglow |
Why let players go in the first place without them having replacement in situ
Basic stuff. | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 10:56 - Jan 30 with 3651 views | union_jack |
I think we are going to be very disappointed come Tuesday morning. No inside knowledge, just a feeling in my water. | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 10:59 - Jan 30 with 3639 views | grabsplatter |
We desperately need a left wingback | | | |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 11:07 - Jan 30 with 3623 views | Catullus |
Maybe we desperately need a change in formation to better suit the squad we actually have got.
I'm thinking all this talk about transfers has been just that and we were never going to sign what we need because we don't have the cash to splash.
The Pato situation obviously hasn't helped. Martin has previously said that players/agents were contacting him and saying they wanted to come here, well then, where are they? Was that just more BS? | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 11:16 - Jan 30 with 3592 views | max936 |
Bullshit mixed in amongst some truth, I'd imagine, at the end of the day if the clubs decision makers won't sanction the deals, he's snookered. | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 11:23 - Jan 30 with 3545 views | onehunglow |
I honestly feel a new manager would at once bin the 3 at the back nonsense and intall Cabango at CH extending his contract at the same time.
Bennett could play purely a a stopper with Nuaghton and Manning fullbacks
Midfield of Ntcham Downes Walsh / Christie
Piroe and Wolf
would be better
Also forget the goalkeeper playing like a Beckenbauer
Grimes is THE player to offload. Most cant see it. | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 11:33 - Jan 30 with 3527 views | raynor94 |
Because of the wage bill, people have to go out to get people in | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 11:37 - Jan 30 with 3490 views | onehunglow |
in situ maybe wrong phrase;lined up better.
Steamy Windows | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 11:56 - Jan 30 with 3454 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
The normal moan from fans is Swansea will not sign anyone until someone has left the building. One senses things are being done differently these days possibly because of the presence of a head of Football. Mr Allen. | |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 11:59 - Jan 30 with 3444 views | dobjack2 |
Players may fancy the style of football but in the end it's all down to what wages we will pay and the length of contract.
It's why we are more likely to get hungry players from lower divisions rather than established players from the top two divisions. | | | |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 12:05 - Jan 30 with 3423 views | grabsplatter |
If we don't sign a left wingback he absolutely should change to a back 4.
We haven't got the players to effectively play the current formation | | | |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 12:12 - Jan 30 with 3383 views | KeithHaynes |
It’s definitely two. That’s all I know. 👠| |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 12:14 - Jan 30 with 3377 views | yatesie3 |
Haven't 9 already left?
How many more need to go before someone comes in?
As if the squad isn't already bare!! | | | |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 12:22 - Jan 30 with 3359 views | johnlangy |
Just what I was about to say. I know some of them are loans so we may be still paying some wages but the three that have come in can't surely have wiped out all the wage savings. Unless we paid a fairly large loan amount for Wolf ? | | | |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 12:27 - Jan 30 with 3333 views | Badlands |
If we'd a competent striker we would have drawn the game yesterday.
If we had replaced Grimes with a stronger personality and slightly more attacking mindset we might have won the game.
If Martin had realised he need to prepare the team to be ready to play all out from the whistle we would not have been two down so easily.
The system works when the midfield wakes up even with poor front line. | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 12:28 - Jan 30 with 3314 views | onehunglow |
If.
I blame Telly Savalas | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 12:34 - Jan 30 with 3312 views | jasper_T |
Wolf's on a fortune at his club, and we'll surely be paying a significant part of it. He'll be costing more than we're saving with all the loans out combined, I know Lincoln are only chipping in half of Cullen and Whittaker's wages. | | | |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 12:54 - Jan 30 with 3261 views | guthrieintherain |
A pointless signing considering our position in the league.
Would have preferred a player from a lower league than an expensive loan. | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 13:14 - Jan 30 with 3215 views | Treforys_Jack |
Change the bloody formation. | | | |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 13:31 - Jan 30 with 3147 views | onehunglow |
It shows ,Im afraid,how badly we are run. | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 13:40 - Jan 30 with 3131 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
Swansea city are currently balancing the books and on paper should be competitive.
There are no debts.
Stoke are £180m out of pocket and been alongside Swansea for a few seasons. Middlesboro owe the their owner in excess of £100m. Bolton, Wigan and Derby went into administration and Sunderland defaulted on massive debts. Reading are in trouble.
Swansea is not badly run. | |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 13:53 - Jan 30 with 3075 views | onehunglow |
We are.
If you have ambition that is.
We are bringing in waifs and strays who are ineffectual.
We are not building anything at all | |
| |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 14:01 - Jan 30 with 3046 views | BillyChong |
The loan note is currently a debt | | | |
| Swans hierarchy meeting today regards this transfer window on 14:02 - Jan 30 with 3036 views | pete |
more than 2 needed more like 4 or 5 but thats our owners true to form am sorry to say | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
