| Offside!!! 12:07 - Nov 28 with 4093 views | union_jack |
Deserves a brief mention.
| |
| |  |
| Offside!!! on 12:14 - Nov 28 with 3123 views | Boundy |
Piroe was flagged offside not Liard , he had advanced past the defender when Liard squared the ball | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| Offside!!! on 12:16 - Nov 28 with 3112 views | union_jack |
But Piroe was behind the ball when Laird passed it therefore not offside. Or am I missing something? | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 12:16 - Nov 28 with 3108 views | NotLoyal |
Piroe just wasn't offside. End of. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 12:17 - Nov 28 with 3107 views | pencoedjack |
Gingers never trust them | | | |
| Offside!!! on 12:19 - Nov 28 with 3101 views | union_jack |
A more understandable decision than the Carroll one though! | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 12:24 - Nov 28 with 3084 views | NotLoyal |
As the match report stated (on here I think) Carrol could have been onside, according to Gareth Vincent? But I don't see it. Piroes goal would have seen us move on and take the points, as it was it was scratched off. Blackpool decisions and yesterday cost us goals at least. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 12:32 - Nov 28 with 3064 views | Boundy |
I sit just in with the edge of the box & IMO I thought he was offside | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| Offside!!! on 12:56 - Nov 28 with 3020 views | union_jack |
Photo suggests otherwise but as I said, a far more understandable decision (albeit wrong seemingly) to the Caroll decision. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 13:01 - Nov 28 with 3013 views | jackrabbit |
Pity Carroll’s not visible in the first frame when the ball is passed forward. As it is it’s indeterminate. The last frame shows him well ahead of Williams when he receives the ball, but that’s irrelevant. We need to see where he was at the instant the ball left the passer’s foot. [Post edited 28 Nov 2021 13:03]
| | | |
| Offside!!! on 13:09 - Nov 28 with 2989 views | union_jack |
Agreed but he'd have to have run pretty fast to get that distance. Faster than he is capable I'd suggest. Even Usain Bolt may have had a difficulty getting that far ahead.
The only thing I would say is that at the time of the ball going forward,mwilliams ran forward to spring the offside trap and they were level but even then I can't see it.
The linesman was right there as well so he had to have seen it which admittedly adds to the confusion.
Edit: Just looked at it again and Williams was facing back towards goal so no way would he have been able to turn and get up to speed in that very shirt amount if time.
Offside without any shadow of a doubt. [Post edited 28 Nov 2021 13:11]
| |
| |
| Offside!!! on 13:18 - Nov 28 with 2954 views | Badlands |
Piroe offside.
Carroll miles offside.
Did Martin's video upset the refereeing world?
Poor positioning from Williams though, Not the right game to cave in to Liverpool IMO. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 14:39 - Nov 28 with 2866 views | Catullus |
To be honest, I think I'd rather send Williams back to Liverpool and give our Brandon Cooper a chance. Williams is tall but not physical enough, we know Cooper will get stuck in when needs be. Besides, I'd rather develop one of our own for us than develop a player for Liverpool. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 14:55 - Nov 28 with 2831 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Which is what the linesman saw, not that he was behind the ball, which he clearly is. | | | |
| Offside!!! on 17:53 - Nov 28 with 2665 views | Thrasher6 |
Carroll was 100% offside. Whichever way you look at it....there is no possible way that from the start of the pass and the first visible camera shot...that he could have made up that amount of distance between him and the defender. 100% stonewaller…. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 18:39 - Nov 28 with 2628 views | jack_lord |
We've been done for 5 points these last two home games. Our players were pretty lax yesterday but we did score three (including the one notched off) and should have scored more if luck was on our side and the keeper wasn't in the way. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 21:12 - Nov 28 with 2509 views | Badlands |
I was bang in line with Williams, our last player, and Carroll was more than two yards in front of him.
There won’t be a clearer off-side all season. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 21:23 - Nov 28 with 2486 views | union_jack |
In any game.
Anywhere. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 21:36 - Nov 28 with 2464 views | Catullus |
What like Ronaldo in the Chelsea v manc game today. What is VAR for, why complain we don't have it in the Championship when even where they do have it, they still get it badly wrong.
We have shoddy referees and then shoddy staff in the VAR office making knowingly bad calls. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 21:59 - Nov 28 with 2445 views | swan65split |
Simple answer, ref appears to be the same as at Luton......... | | | |
| Offside!!! on 22:15 - Nov 28 with 2420 views | union_jack |
Yes the Ronaldo one was another poor lino error but would have been reviewed if he'd scored. We didn't get that luxury unfortunately. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 22:29 - Nov 28 with 2412 views | 34dfgdf54 |
I cannot see how Carroll could have been onside looking at the photos and replay of goal, only Williams protested though which was weird.
Piroe - onside | | | |
| Offside!!! on 07:32 - Nov 29 with 2287 views | Flynnidine_Zidownes |
I was in line with the first one and I thought it was inside. It was a well timed run but Williams was about ten yards behind the rest of the defence for most of the game. They noticed this early on and targeted him. | | | |
| Offside!!! on 09:24 - Nov 29 with 2231 views | Catullus |
Isn't that rule stupid though. Manyoo got a corner because Ronaldo didn't score, what if they'd scored from the corner?
They tinker with these rules then put the glaring mistakes right. VAR should pull up blatant offsides every time. | |
| |
| Offside!!! on 12:17 - Nov 29 with 2170 views | union_jack |
The problem is when the lino does not see it, which shouldn't have been the case in that game but was. As it didn't result in a goal I don't think VAR kicks in therefore game goes on.
Yes, silly but if you check VAR for everything then the game could last days😄.
2 appeals per team for such things maybe? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
