Nat Philips 20:44 - Aug 8 with 3523 views | saint22 | Have we bid for him? Vest on his way to Leicester JWP staying put Where is the striker? [Post edited 8 Aug 2021 20:44]
| | | | |
Nat Philips on 20:53 - Aug 8 with 3084 views | PatfromPoole | Things finally appear to be ramping up….. | |
| |
Nat Philips on 20:56 - Aug 8 with 3075 views | Butty101 | What has happened? | |
| |
Nat Philips on 10:10 - Aug 9 with 2841 views | saint22 | Let’s hope he comes Ralph seems to be set on prioritising attacking over defending generally but that needs to change this season | | | |
Nat Philips on 10:53 - Aug 9 with 2791 views | SonicBoom | At least we'll have a decent chance of scoring against Leicester then.... | | | |
Nat Philips on 12:03 - Aug 13 with 2466 views | saint22 | What’s the skinny, is he the Vestergaard replacement? | | | |
Nat Philips on 15:34 - Aug 13 with 2273 views | saint22 | Well I hope they don't go for Kabak over him that would be a big error | | | |
Nat Philips on 18:53 - Aug 13 with 2056 views | Ron11 | Gary Cahill, surely? Does it appear that Hassenhutl is going more on the attack this season rather than snatching a goal and then dropping deeper into a more defensive shape and inviting the inevitable mistake by a defender or keeper and surrendering a slim lead? | | | |
Nat Philips on 00:07 - Aug 14 with 1884 views | Gennaro_Contaldo | Cahill is a free agent? WTF, he should be signed up ASAP. Experience, decent career, get him in. Then spend the cash on that younger player to be moulded (but not too young, i.e. 23/24 not 18). | |
| |
Nat Philips on 01:07 - Aug 14 with 1849 views | NYC_Saint | Sounds far too sensible for us | | | |
Nat Philips on 21:01 - Aug 14 with 1598 views | saint22 | Well, Among other things today certainly proved we desperately need a good CB in ASAP | | | |
Nat Philips on 21:07 - Aug 14 with 1591 views | PatfromPoole | Still think Tomkins would be a decent addition to the CB’s. From a very solid Palace defence. | |
| |
Nat Philips on 22:07 - Aug 14 with 1557 views | saint22 | Yep or Cahill Anyone but Stephens It’s astonishing he still starts | | | |
Nat Philips on 22:15 - Aug 14 with 1547 views | kingolaf | What about Tomkins and Cahill. One on a free, one with a year left on his deal at a club that have just signed 2 players in his position. | | | |
Nat Philips on 22:51 - Aug 14 with 1531 views | Bicester_North | Quite a few experienced ones out of contract That N’Koulou at Torino for one, good experience. Leeds were linked with him a while back. | |
| |
Nat Philips on 15:09 - Aug 15 with 1458 views | saint22 | Let’s hope Ralph didn’t waste all his time on Merseyside yesterday and popped in to see Nat and get him on board | | | |
Nat Philips on 15:43 - Aug 15 with 1429 views | saint22 | Shame tho maybe that’s right Read that Cahill is in talks…..? | | | |
Nat Philips on 15:59 - Aug 15 with 1406 views | Saintsforeverj | Not seen anything on Cahill. We were talking about this yesterday at the game. He is free, experienced, a leader and looking for a club. But as usual for our club, they don't want to get players in who don't have sell on value. | |
| |
Nat Philips on 16:10 - Aug 15 with 1390 views | 1885_SFC | | |
| |
Nat Philips on 16:15 - Aug 15 with 1382 views | Saintsforeverj | Good news if true. I know a Palace fan who is upset to see him go. He has left because he doesn't fit Vieera's fast flowing football, as he is a bit slower now. But he is an organiser, a leader and experienced. And he is free! | |
| |
Nat Philips on 16:44 - Aug 15 with 1350 views | saint22 | If we don’t get someone like him in there will be lots of players we get sell on value for when we go down | | | |
Nat Philips on 16:46 - Aug 15 with 1344 views | Saintsforeverj | Exactly. Totally agree. It's short sighted. | |
| |
Nat Philips on 16:53 - Aug 15 with 1338 views | battler | Sign him up ! He would of definitely been a Lawrie Mac signing and most of them worked out well. | | | |
Nat Philips on 17:11 - Aug 15 with 1308 views | saint22 | Call me greedy but I would like him and Philips, otherwise we are only an injury away from the same old issue | | | |
| |