Colin Pitchfork released 12:40 - Jul 13 with 3372 views | onehunglow | This chap raped and murdered 2 school children in the 80s. Parole Board have released him albeit against Govt objections. Why do we allow our kid to face this type of offender when they is a risk he coul could do it again. People who do this can never surely be released unless we grade their freedom to be at large greater than school children. Parole Board have screwed up many times and it carries on. | |
| | |
Colin Pitchfork released on 00:07 - Nov 20 with 1220 views | RonaldStump | The question has to be asked. Who has been protecting this vile monster for the last however many years. They would have been queuing up to take this monster out both inside and outside of jail. Who's the rat protecting him? | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 08:52 - Nov 20 with 1154 views | onehunglow | We ask questions abut all manner of superflous matters but not people who make up the Parole Board. Why do we have to even consider releasing early .Why half a sentence too. Consider the risks the public face by Parole Board thinking (hoping) they are SAFE to release back into society. We see on this site endless bitter exchanges about matters that are really pretty meaningless yet virtually bugger all on this matter. We are releasing killers and rapists EARLY. Why? | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 09:11 - Nov 20 with 1147 views | KeithHaynes | He’s back in jail. Breached his licence. | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 09:41 - Nov 20 with 1130 views | angryjack | Well if he had done that to any my family there be someone else being done for torture and murder in couple weeks [Post edited 20 Nov 2021 9:42]
| | | |
Colin Pitchfork released on 09:41 - Nov 20 with 1130 views | angryjack | Well if he had done that to any my family there be someone else being done for torture and murder in couple weeks | | | |
Colin Pitchfork released on 10:38 - Nov 20 with 1114 views | onehunglow | Hence my post as to why the Parole Board make these dangerous decisions putting our kid at risk. | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 12:07 - Nov 20 with 1101 views | KeithHaynes | Not sure what he did, or as you know didn't do as a result of breaching his licence, but at least the recall was done expeditiously. | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 12:22 - Nov 20 with 1091 views | Sirjohnalot | Could be for anything, such as being drunk eg or missing a curfew. Anything that increases the risk, he’ll be immediately recalled, which is what’s happened here. My personal views on the piece of….are different to what is the legal situation. Had he been sentenced now, he’d have got a whole life sentence [Post edited 20 Nov 2021 12:24]
| | | |
Colin Pitchfork released on 18:39 - Nov 20 with 1048 views | theloneranger | It's been reported that he's back behind bars for approaching young girls while out on long walks. | |
| Everyday above ground ... Is a good day! 😎 |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 22:28 - Nov 20 with 1009 views | onehunglow | Point is this. Who decided it was SAFE to release him. That is what it is all about. He will have supporters and people concerned about his welfare | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 22:59 - Nov 20 with 1002 views | Jack123 | That is a good point, I don't even remember this case for some reason, but from what I have read, he's a monster.. | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 09:25 - Nov 21 with 967 views | onehunglow | How do they work out the percentage of safety. Is it a 1% chance of reoffending? If it is,it's too much. A moot point for jonalot to help us | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 13:40 - Nov 21 with 926 views | Sirjohnalot | Threshold is whether they pose a risk of physical of mental harm to the public and can any risk be managed in the community. It’s a massively involved process, hearings normally take at least a day, 3 members of the Parole board, quite often includes a psychiatrist or psychologist. They look at Initial offence, behaviour since being inside, course done, drink drugs, further psychiatric report. Offender manager and supervisor give evidence, and are cross examined not only by someone like me but also by the panel. I’ve no idea why he’s been recalled, what’s been reported, may well be something made up by the papers. Was a brave decision to release him, but they’d be bound by the law at the time he was sentenced. If it was today, he’d never be released. EDIT as properly pointed out by onehungbelow the word ‘brave’ is a poor choice of word, not meant in a positive way [Post edited 22 Nov 2021 21:43]
| | | |
Colin Pitchfork released on 19:50 - Nov 22 with 827 views | onehunglow | We dont need brave decisions that can kill or maim.By brave, you basically mean risky and risky is not what the public should have to put up with just to sate the liberal ,bleeding heart apologists for evil people. These people should simply NEVER be released under any circumstances. We have fundamentally misunderstood the malovolence in people and our guilt as a society means we believe we should give them a chance as WE -society- failed the Perp. It is sickening. | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 21:31 - Nov 22 with 797 views | KeithHaynes | For me it’s obvious. The system let him out, and a well versed and old school surveillance plan by the police put him back where he belongs. Within a day. | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 21:34 - Nov 22 with 795 views | Sirjohnalot | Sorry, stupid use of the word ‘brave’ didn’t mean it in a positive way, more when a stupid decision is made and it’s described as ‘brave ‘ I agree with you he should never be released but the law when he was sentenced means he can be considered for parole As often happens my personal and legal viewpoints don’t equate [Post edited 22 Nov 2021 21:44]
| | | |
Colin Pitchfork released on 21:51 - Nov 22 with 766 views | KeithHaynes | No need to Explain mate. | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 10:06 - Nov 23 with 717 views | onehunglow | You're a class act. I might not agree with you but you have style,as indeed does our site Leader. No need to apologise . | |
| |
Colin Pitchfork released on 18:28 - Nov 23 with 650 views | Sirjohnalot | I always say to my witnesses before a trial, especially coppers, that if they think the defence brief has made a valid and good point, concede it, comes across really well. I see so many police witnesses refusing to acknowledge anything the defence say, especially police drug 'experts'. Really weakens their case. I was prosecuting a really nasty domestic violence case last year where the defence had some evidence that the victim had put something on social media saying that she was going to get her brother to get the Defendant. There was a picture of her injury in front of her, she picked it up showed it to the jury and said 'Yes I did, I shouldn't have done, but look what he did to me. Had my brother caught he, he'd have killed him, he injured his little sister. What was a good point by the defence, turned into a good one for us. | | | |
Colin Pitchfork released on 18:45 - Nov 23 with 644 views | britferry | first case ever to use DNA | |
| |
| |