| 🇺🇸Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread”🇺🇸 01:18 - Sep 29 with 220746 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Who will be watching? First one kicks off in 24 hours time.
The Democrats have pulled Joe back from his campaign trail recently to get him prepared, so hopefully it will be a decent exchange.
Unfortunately they don’t seem to have great confidence as they have spent the last month looking for any dirt they can dig up so Joe can use if he gets stuck.
It’s no coincidence that this vote influencing Facebook algorithm story is being shamelessly and inaccurately made into a race issue on the eve of the debates. So transparent and disingenuous, it’s a shame politics has come to this on this level where black people are being used in this way to score political points. I would be furious if I was them, but it does seem a lot of people are not falling for this one and calling it out for what it is.
People finally seem to be getting wise to this political race baiting which is refreshing to see.
It’s also telling that in the week of the debate they try and paint Trump as a tax evasion offender. I think that’s what they wanted the tax returns to show, they seem to have got annoyed when it turns out his tax returns were fine in accordance to what his companies profits were - but decided to run with it anyway. Any news is good news in their mind as it’s another thing Joe can use when in a tricky spot.
But I hope the discussions remain political and doesn’t turn into some form of gossip peddling reality TV episode.
Although I think there should be some kind of drinking game involved if it does turn that way, how many times Biden completely loses his thread of thought and blurts out “I mean, think about it...” you have to take a shot. 
I will be watching with great interest anyway.
This post has been edited by an administrator | |
| |  |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 22:45 - Oct 9 with 1231 views | DJack |
The fact that you claim Flynn is innocent tells me you are drinking from the KoolAid. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 22:47 - Oct 9 with 1226 views | A_Fans_Dad |
That is because after of 8 years of Obama rule the Republicans didn't have any policies worth talking about. | | | |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 22:50 - Oct 9 with 1226 views | DJack |
Funnily enough I was thinking of the Clinton 14points thing when I posted and I only posted as I suspect that this time the lead will stay that way unless
a) Biden has a mega-gaff, which is not impossible with him.
b) The appearence of a major dirty trick/smear, a birther+/Benghazi event if you will.
Speaking of birther, wasn't Trump going to reveal the truth when he became President...Hmmm! | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 22:53 - Oct 9 with 1217 views | A_Fans_Dad |
You believe the polls.
 | | | |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:00 - Oct 9 with 1210 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Vegan.
The mud slinging is largely from the left, it’s insatiable. That’s because their policies make no sense, police reform is going to cost bare minimum 30 billion, which means they are getting rid of the Trump tax bill which gives $2000 to lower income families, they are going to pack the court and not tell the people that is their intention - introducing ACTUAL fascism to the White House.
It’s funny most people think fascism is a right wing thing, it’s not, it’s predominantly been a left wing trait and you can see how it comes about. I have never in my lifetime seen mobs of violent thugs going from car to car and restaurant to restaurant insisting people make the black power sign and verbally say “BLM” or face the consequences. This is all backed by the Democrats, who supported a fund that bails rioters out of jail.
Just insanity. | |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:09 - Oct 9 with 1207 views | DJack |
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency
Country: Unknown
History
Founded in 2020, Revolver.News is a conservative news aggregation/curation website that claims to be the new Drudge Report. At the bottom of articles, they claim “Revolver News is dedicated to news aggregation and analysis. While we greatly respect and admire Matt Drudge, the Drudge Report no longer has its finger on the pulse of America. We aim to fill that void, and much more. We are dedicated to providing Americans of all backgrounds and political persuasions with timely, common-sense, accurate, and compelling information.”
The website lacks transparency as they do not provide an about page, name authors or editors, and do not openly disclose ownership.
Funded by / Ownership
Revolver.News lacks transparency as they do not disclose ownership. Revenue is derived through advertising.
Analysis / Bias
In review, Revolver.News primarily aggregates news from external sources. Most stories favor the right and frequently utilize loaded emotional headlines and wording such as this TRUMP SUPPORTER COMMITS SUICIDE AFTER GETTING CAUGHT IN LEFT’S INJUSTICE SYSTEM… This story links to the right-wing conspiracy website the Gateway Pundit. Other aggregated news stories come from credible sources such as Axios, Daily Beast, The Hill, and Local News Stations. However, some stories are published from low-quality sources such as RT, Hot Air, Wayne Dupree, and Twitter.
Editorially, Revolver.News occasionally produces original content that aligns with the right and is generally favorable toward the Trump administration such as this While A Terrific Judge, Amy Coney Barrett May Create Electoral Pitfalls For Trump 2020. Although this is an opinion piece, it does not provide a single hyperlinked source to verify its claims. In general, Revolver.News reports news from a strong right-leaning perspective and lacks credibility due to a complete lack of transparency.
Failed Fact Checks
None to date
Overall, we rate Revolver.News right biased and Questionable based on the use of poor sourcing techniques and a complete lack of transparency. (D. Van Zandt 9/21/2020)
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/revolver-news/ | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:12 - Oct 9 with 1204 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Yes, we all know that the MSM doesn't like right leaning news sources and investigators.
Why don't you just try and prove them actually wrong instead of posting garbage hit jobs? | | | |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:16 - Oct 9 with 1200 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Surely if source bias is of huge importance to you... you wouldn’t be posting CNN links most days?
Your bias website says it’s strongly biased.
CNN feature heavily in my media thread a few threads down, their dishonesty is frightening. | |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:18 - Oct 9 with 1200 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Doc, they just don't get it.
There was that massive hulabulu about the President building cages and putting illegal immigrant people in them, including kids.
It was Obama that built them and introduced that policy.
All this stuff is so easy to corroborate. | | | |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:21 - Oct 9 with 1199 views | DJack |
Trump gets huge boost from anti-abortion group
The Susan B. Anthony List and its partner PAC will launch the $52 million effort to back the president’s reelection and protect Senate Republicans’ majority.
Edit to add... Perhaps this is one of the reasons why Planned Parenthood donate?
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/17/trump-anti-abortion-pac-100258 [Post edited 9 Oct 2020 23:24]
| |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:23 - Oct 9 with 1196 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Right?
It’s very hard to keep up with you jumping about all over these links to different topics DJack. So what point are you making now?
These links really do need to have some form of opinion or point next to them. | |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:25 - Oct 9 with 1193 views | DJack |
And it was Brits that invented the concentration camp... your point, oh no you dont have one. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:29 - Oct 9 with 1188 views | DJack |
As I said Perhaps Planned Parenthood made a large contribution to try and counter the anti-abortion lobby. It was quite simple.
As to jumping about the thread is on the Presidential debates/elections and any point linked to that...voting/economy /defence /the courts etc is germane. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:33 - Oct 9 with 1187 views | Dr_Parnassus |
We have seen time and time again that the media treat Trump differently. It’s just tiresome. Why people pay so much attention to the media and various links I will never know.
 | |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:37 - Oct 9 with 1185 views | Dr_Parnassus |
You said that after I replied...
and no, that’s not why they donate.
I understand it’s a political thread... but there is no debate coming from you here. You are posting link after link after link after link to random things, as soon as you get a counter, you don’t address it and move on to the next link. I can’t think of any other thread or topic where someone does this?
You must have posted close to 50 links now?! Pretty much none have been in keeping with the discussion at the time.
Can’t you just debate your thoughts using your own words, if we don’t believe a certain thing we can then ask for a source. But dumping a link in place of debate is what uninformed leftists do to avoid debate and cover up their lack of knowledge on a subject (by the way I’m not directing that at you just saying the behaviour is similar).
Take KilkennyJack for example. That’s what he does. Don’t be like Kilk. [Post edited 9 Oct 2020 23:39]
| |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:38 - Oct 9 with 1184 views | DJack |
So the only major nations not part of the Covid vaccine alliance are Russia and the USA... That is one of the MANY reasons why Trump gets bad press.
https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-xi-jinping-taiwan-china-archive-aae170 | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:43 - Oct 9 with 1178 views | Dr_Parnassus |
No it isn’t. Covid started in Feb in the US, the media offensive started the year he was running.
The organisation covered up Chinas involvement in the release of coronavirus, and you want America to join it?
Interesting. | |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:49 - Oct 9 with 1173 views | DJack |
So what part of "one of the MANY reasons" do you not get? | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:50 - Oct 9 with 1172 views | Dr_Parnassus |
All of it, it’s not any kind of reason let alone one of many. | |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 23:59 - Oct 9 with 1167 views | DJack |
No problems. Usually your typing is VERY RAPID so in this instance I was a little ahead.
Aye it is a political thread (yeuch!) and it is also a thread in the future of the western powerhouse and the effects thereof. It is not a debating society so I'm not bound to debate things with you.
I can imagine your frustration with this as you love a good ding-dong but I'm falling out of love with it  and I think the Syria and the Skripals threads just wore me out so I prefer a little guerrilla warfare  . | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 00:06 - Oct 10 with 1162 views | Dr_Parnassus |
It’s not frustrating, it’s just a little bizarre. I don’t get it.
If you are posting on this thread then surely discussion is what you want? I just don’t see the point in posting dozens of links. In the last 5 pages you have posted 23 links to various random pieces, yet don’t seem to want to discuss any of them? | |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 00:22 - Oct 10 with 1158 views | DJack |
As to "You must have posted close to 50 links now?!" and commenting on me using CNN, these are the links I've used in the thread...
ap news x1
bbc x1
breibart x1
businessinsider.com x1
cnn x3
daily mail x3
facebook t's & c's x1
fivethirtyeight x1
forbes x1
theguardian x2
huffingtonpost x1
A Kelly Loeffler twitter post
mediabiasfactcheck x1
nationalgeographic x1
newsweek x1
nytimes x2
outsideonline x1
politico x2
reuters x1
Survey usa x1
time x1
usatoday x1
vanityfair x1
washingtonpost x1
wiley online library x1
x32 links (some in reply) about the situation in America/election related with the Daily Mail and CNN at a tie for most links... three each | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 00:24 - Oct 10 with 1158 views | DJack |
As I've said I'm tired of it BUT I wont let it be one sided. I post so others can garner information germane to the thread and not just be stuck in a siloh of a thread. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Presidential debate round 1 - “Matchday thread” on 00:28 - Oct 10 with 1154 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Tired of what?
Posting links to biased sites isn’t really helping the other side. There are others on here that are for the Democrats who are perfectly able to state the opposite view without having to dump dozens and dozens of links without context or discussion. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
