| Jamie Allen 13:23 - Mar 1 with 4194 views | BartRowou |
I was really impressed with him last week and even more impressed watching him v Sunderland at the moment, so the question is:
Do we?*
(not Julian)* | |
| |  |
| Jamie Allen on 14:02 - Mar 1 with 4121 views | boromat |
Depends on Burton's deal but I should guess so. | |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 14:35 - Mar 1 with 4073 views | BartRowou |
He was subbed near the end so I've reined in my expectations. | |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 15:05 - Mar 1 with 4025 views | seasidedale |
Don’t thing we will get anything as usually our sell on clauses are based on profit the buyer makes. I remember reading when Coventry bought him, Burton said it was considerably less then they paid dale | | | |
| Jamie Allen on 15:22 - Mar 1 with 3995 views | D_Alien |
He's grown at least 3 inches since he left us, or approx. 4.5%
Didn't we include that as an add-on?
Edit: and if not, i hope the club have learned from this, and included it as part of the Luke Matheson deal. If he's still with Wolves in 3 years time, they'll be getting more player than what they paid for. It's not fair [Post edited 1 Mar 2020 15:32]
| |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 16:20 - Mar 1 with 3898 views | Toffeemanc |
Funny how financially for the club his sale won't be one of the better deals we have done, yet for me he is the best player our academy has produced in the last 10 years. | |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 17:25 - Mar 1 with 3798 views | boromat |
Agree I'm a big fan of Jamie. Technically the best player we've produced. Great assist from him today. Easily Coventry's man of the match. | |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 19:34 - Mar 1 with 3624 views | mightydale |
Play the player in his correct position , and fcuking erm see erm what erm happens. Jamie Allen should of been our first million pound player.
typical rochdale to fcuk it up [Post edited 1 Mar 2020 19:42]
| |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 19:37 - Mar 1 with 3608 views | rochdaleriddler |
I’m not a fan of always looking to recruit former players, some obviously leave to go on to better things, but if this doesn’t work out why do we always seem to welcome them back? It’s as though we don’t seem to be looking elsewhere . | |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 19:49 - Mar 1 with 3565 views | boromat |
Don't think anyone has mentioned signing him back. Mainly because we couldn't afford him in a million years 😂. | |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 20:04 - Mar 1 with 3527 views | TVOS1907 |
I think Bart was referring to some sort of sell-on clause, which is the usual question from someone in cases like this. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 08:26 - Mar 2 with 3228 views | sweetcorn |
Literally no mention of signing him back anywhere in the thread.
Not sure why you’d be so against it if we did? He was our best midfielder when we had him and would stroll back into this side. | |
| Leader of the little gang of immature cretins. |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 13:02 - Mar 2 with 3030 views | Shun |
I still get happy thoughts when I think of that midfield of Allen, Lund and Dawson. | | | |
| Jamie Allen on 13:09 - Mar 2 with 3012 views | James1980 |
What is the definitive answer re extra money from the career of Mr Allen? | |
| |
| Jamie Allen on 19:12 - Mar 2 with 2859 views | jokerthief |
He should have played in central midfield with Joe Rafferty for Dale...
Hill was clueless with players best positions.... | | | |
| Jamie Allen on 20:13 - Mar 2 with 2802 views | James1980 |
Did he play them in a plethora of position to increase their market value? Player X is a great CB but can do a job at LB, CAM, CDM and if the bar is short can pull an excellent pint | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
