| Legal action 19:45 - Aug 31 with 9059 views | cwmdonkinjack |
Whilst on and off the field matters are separate to some extent, do we really want to drag the club through the courts and create the impression of disharmony. Sometimes in life you just have to take things on the chin and move on. I see the only winners of this action to be the lawyers and a media who would be more than delighted to stick the knife in. Let’s keep the positivity of a great start to the season and build on the momentum of our new management and eager squad involving many products of the investment in our academy. Several key decisions including the appointments of chairman, manager and transfer team are looking spot on and we have managed to move on some of the right players and get decent value for others we would have wanted to keep. C’mon you Whites! | | | |  |
| Legal action on 22:42 - Aug 31 with 1506 views | exiledclaseboy |
Legal action would be about protecting the future of the club, not impacting on the present. Short termism is what got us to where we are. | |
| |
| Legal action on 22:59 - Aug 31 with 1480 views | monmouth |
I'm sure someone will correct this if wrong, but money for the share purchase cannot come from the club. Americans or sellouts depending on the court judgement if the Trust win. Arses will be twitching, so your mind can stay at rest..............or can it...... | |
| |
| Legal action on 23:09 - Aug 31 with 1470 views | Pegojack |
This.
Current team and management have made a dream start to the season and we're all immensely proud of them.
That has no bearing on what the sellouts did to us, and by feck they are going to pay for it. | | | |
| Legal action on 23:17 - Aug 31 with 1464 views | Swanseajill |
We did have some laughs with him though.
I would be in the chat room in the early hours after one of those "away days" | | | |
| Legal action on 23:26 - Aug 31 with 1441 views | Highjack |
We’ve seen what’s happened to Bury and what nearly happened to Bolton. If that ever happens to us we’ll have a group with twenty odd million ready to step in immediately. It’s a no brainer. | |
| |
| Legal action on 23:36 - Aug 31 with 1432 views | NeathJack |
Correct.
This NortBankBoy character has been spewing this bile for a while. | | | |
| Legal action on 23:45 - Aug 31 with 1417 views | longlostjack |
This. | |
| |
| Legal action on 23:59 - Aug 31 with 1392 views | jacks777 |
And what happens if the debt is £50 million ?
Also we have the trust with 21 % of shares bringing nothing to the party.
How much is the trust worth ? Virtually nothing. | | | |
| Legal action on 02:01 - Sep 1 with 1351 views | NotLoyal |
Like your brain, or should I say the splattering of mince inside your piss bag of a head. | |
| |
| Legal action on 02:58 - Sep 1 with 1340 views | DJack |
Well done Gary. You are living proof that sometimes you should listen to the nutter...  | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Legal action on 07:38 - Sep 1 with 1301 views | jacks777 |
Your head is full of that sniff that you think is cool to take.
How is your war on the previous owners going 😂 | | | |
| Legal action on 07:53 - Sep 1 with 1296 views | pikeypaul |
Causing disharmony on the pitch was one of Uxbridges many desperate arguments to stop legal action first time around.
We all know now what a huge mistake that was.3 years down the line with the sellout coonts and present owners going back on everything they said would happen if the trust did not go ahead with legal action their contempt for the fans has not changed.
Just remember the stinking yanks have invested nothing in our club and have siphoned off huge amounts but we still have some pricks defending them. | |
| |
| Legal action on 08:00 - Sep 1 with 1291 views | jack247 |
Totally agree with the general gist of this thread. On pitch success, as brilliant and galvanising as it is, is short term and should have no bearing on legal action at all.
The sellouts may get lucky if we go up, but as it stands, the shares are worth far less than we should have been able to sell them for. Let’s get it done and get a slush fund in the bank, just to cover any future doomsday scenarios. | | | |
| Legal action on 08:02 - Sep 1 with 1289 views | waynekerr55 |
Great post, Pike | |
| |
| Legal action (n/t) on 08:04 - Sep 1 with 1287 views | jack247 |
[Post edited 1 Sep 2019 8:05]
| | | |
| Legal action on 08:40 - Sep 1 with 1245 views | AguycalledJack |
Because the sale of the club/ shares to the yanks involves a club that we all love, there is a certain amount of emotional blackmail used to try and prevent legal action, or dissuade people from taking legal action eg the team is now playing well, legal action will impact on the team etc.
Let’s set aside the emotions, at the end of the day the sale of shares was no more than a business transaction.
I voted for legal action, And I looked at it this way, if I owned circa 20% of any sized business ( whether that have been the local bakers or a multi million pound company) and my fellow shareholders then sold that business behind my back, I, as an individual would want redress and what I was entitled to. We all would.
You can bet your bottom dollar if the roles were reversed the yanks/ sellouts would not have waited this long to get the trust into court. | | | |
| Legal action on 09:10 - Sep 1 with 1209 views | Uxbridge |
That's not necessarily correct. If the judgement was to buy out the Trust, they then owned 100% of the club, they'd have more scope to do what they want with the club, such as leverage it.
Worth noting this was covered in the consultation docs too, as I'm sure someone will say we didn't cover any potential eventuality. | |
| |
| Legal action on 09:35 - Sep 1 with 1186 views | perchrockjack |
I seem to disagree with just about everyone but that is fine by me. | |
| |
| Legal action on 09:37 - Sep 1 with 1181 views | waynekerr55 |
On a serious note, I've almost finished reading The Secret Barrister. I know you have no time for their ilk but it does make very good reading. | |
| |
| Legal action on 09:44 - Sep 1 with 1172 views | swancity |
Strangely you bury your head in the sand on this subject though which is unusual for someone who likes to see justice. Or does that only apply to drink drivers? Are dodgy business deals immune from your thoughts and ones that involve a Club that you try to portray to love ? | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Legal action on 09:47 - Sep 1 with 1169 views | perchrockjack |
Nige
No.
Not sure what drink drivers have to do with this subject.
Could you explain that,or is it just another return to old spats 10 feck years old,man.
I fail to see how legal action helps us at this stage in the season.
that s all,son | |
| |
| Legal action on 09:51 - Sep 1 with 1165 views | swancity |
Oh come on you’re not thick
I don’t need to state the obvious
And who says it’ll be at this stage of the season? Even so the playing side won’t be affected imo. | |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Legal action on 09:55 - Sep 1 with 1148 views | Darran |
More Perch cock sucking. Any chance of putting it on the non football board if you’ve got to gobble him off. | |
| |
| Legal action on 09:59 - Sep 1 with 1139 views | jack247 |
It doesn’t help us ‘at this stage in the season’, it doesn’t hinder us either, unless you think Cooper and his players are going to take it down a notch or two because the trust are suing Huw Jenkins.
It helps ensure the long term future of the club. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
