| Thank you Harry Kane 20:59 - Jun 18 with 9032 views | smegma |
Ten goals in last eight England games. Keep on doing what you're doing. | | | |  |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 21:01 - Jun 18 with 6318 views | bosh67 |
Yup. At least we have one player who knows where the net is. | |
| |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 21:07 - Jun 18 with 6292 views | ted_hendrix |
HK was nearly murdered in the penalty box in the second half, not by one player but by two at the same time, absolutely hauled to the ground.
Blatant penalty FWIW. | |
| My Father had a profound influence on me, he was a lunatic. |
| |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 21:24 - Jun 18 with 6238 views | CiderwithRsie |
Pisspoor refereeing. Didn't mind Tunisia's penalty, you think: that's the modern game, can't go near a player in the box yada yada, then apparently it's alright to jump all over the guy if he's English. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 21:26 - Jun 18 with 6223 views | smegma |
I'd go further and say the ref was bent.
Two blatant rugby tackles on Kane, nothing.
They make a sub near the end and the player took ages to walk off , ref does nothing. Lingard gets subbed on 87 and the ref more or less frog marches him off. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 21:49 - Jun 18 with 6160 views | londonscottish |
Looked bent to me. | |
| |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 21:52 - Jun 18 with 6147 views | BlackCrowe |
What i have learnt.
Rashford not Sterling
Loftus-Cheek not Alli.
Lingard -shocker. Ashley Young - c u next tuesday.
das ist alles. | |
| |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 21:53 - Jun 18 with 6144 views | davman |
As Lineker said in his never been booked way, there are so many decisions that go against the English on and off the pitch that you have to wonder...
...and how shit is Ashley Young. Can' t defend and can't cross; fantastic combination for a wing back! | |
| |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 21:56 - Jun 18 with 6127 views | Hunterhoop |
Agree. Columbian ref officiating Eng in Russia in the current diplomatic climate and puts in a display like that. Questionable to say the least. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 22:01 - Jun 18 with 6107 views | brokenframe1982 |
Is it true that Harry Kane was joining QPR on loan in recent years?? | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 22:09 - Jun 18 with 6070 views | CiderwithRsie |
Give Sterling, Alli and Lingard more time. They can get better.
There's going to be better teams, sides that'll have us under the cosh and where we can't get Kane in the box, a bit of magic from Sterling or Alli could do the job when direct play from Rashford won't.
But I liked what Loftus-Cheek and Rashford did, it was exactly what the match was crying out for and they should have come on earlier. I like them as impact subs. And yeah, Sterling especially needs to impose himself more. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 22:32 - Jun 18 with 5982 views | thame_hoops |
But what are the VAR people doing? Confusing | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 22:56 - Jun 18 with 5937 views | kensalriser |
No. | |
| |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 00:49 - Jun 19 with 5795 views | kensalriser |
At no point was Kane coming to QPR. That's even if you believe Redknapp's story, which I'm sorry to say that many QPR fans wouldn't. | |
| |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 04:18 - Jun 19 with 5752 views | timcocking |
Thank you Harry Kane indeed. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 04:58 - Jun 19 with 5745 views | smegma |
Give Sterling more time ?? He made his debut SIX years ago, he's hardly a newcomer. Hardly ever completes a game and hardly ever plays well for England. Even all the pundits and press are in agreement on him. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 07:53 - Jun 19 with 5634 views | GroveR |
I make you right, the sink-buying easyjet-flying greggs-sausage-roll-munching SCUMBAG. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 08:10 - Jun 19 with 5604 views | ElHoop |
I think that Southgate will probably keep Sterling in the starting line-up against Panama - we won the game and he'll try to keep everybody up and available. If he drops Sterling then he'll probably deflate him completely - if he starts and scores against Panama then he'll be on the up. If he doesn't score or play well then he can bring on Loftus-Cheek and Rashford (and Vardy hopefully) for half an hour this time and they may well tear a new one for the tiring Panama. Either way Southgate will have done his best to keep everybody happy.
Kane is still improving - he's still quite young for a striker - they tend to get better with age. The way that he took the two goals made it look very easy indeed, but i'm not sure that it was quite so easy. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 09:19 - Jun 19 with 5541 views | Toast_R |
Looked like John Stones got the first goal and the keepers clawed it back out from behind the line. | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 09:45 - Jun 19 with 5496 views | BasingstokeR |
You're not suggesting Kane's claimed someone else's goal?  | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 09:56 - Jun 19 with 5485 views | robith |
I was saying this last night - people might joke cos it was so close in, but the finish on the second given the speed it came at him, the angle of it, and the match situation, was exceptional | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 10:52 - Jun 19 with 5409 views | londonscottish |
Listened to the R5 World Cup Daily podcast on the way in this morning.
Rob Green claimed that Kane was pencilled in for a loan move to Rangers but it got pulled when Spurs decided that they were a striker short. Kane went on to score 20 in 25.
I reckon that would have been the 2011/12 season.
Not sure why Ron Green would make something like that up. | |
| |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 11:48 - Jun 19 with 5311 views | LunarJetman |
are Rob and Ron brothers? | | | |
| Thank you Harry Kane on 11:52 - Jun 19 with 5298 views | SydneyRs |
Agreed, it was very coolly taken given the circumstances. Deliberately placed it away from the keeper near the post. It was in contrast to some of our awful finishing early in the game. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
