| Clucas 18:53 - Feb 11 with 10001 views | max936 |
he looked surprised being hooked back to left back yesterday, I think he's been playing really well further forward surely its best to keep him up there, Thoughts? | |
| |  |
| Clucas on 19:36 - Feb 13 with 2842 views | caerleon_jack |
So the fact he's our only recognised left back, who was being targeted by their players and fans, and was on a yellow didn't come into the decision at all?
I agree Carlos wanted to bring on another attacking option, but the decision to hook Olsson rather than Naughton would certainly have been influenced by Olsson being on a yellow. | |
| Insert something witty here |
| |
| Clucas on 22:55 - Feb 13 with 2786 views | harryhpalmer |
if you thought Clucas was surprised...he was not as shocked as Olsson was! | |
| |
| Clucas on 22:59 - Feb 13 with 2783 views | max936 |
Yep he looked around as if to say "Who me"  | |
| |
| Clucas on 23:26 - Feb 13 with 2770 views | LeonWasGod |
About time too. He needs some competition as he's been coasting this year imo. | | | |
| Clucas on 23:46 - Feb 13 with 2760 views | TheResurrection |
Nope, not at all. Clucas couldn't have gone to right wing back could he.
Also just before getting subbed Olsson put a terrible cross over and Carlos looked fed up.
And lastly, as Carlos said it was all about getting all the meat on the barbeque, so that meant Clucas still in an attacking role along with our other big guns.
The yellow was mostly irrelevant in that decision. | |
| |
| Clucas on 23:48 - Feb 13 with 2755 views | TheResurrection |
On Saturday it was the least important factor in him coming off. He just wanted to get better attacking options whilst keeping our balance. | |
| |
| Clucas on 08:37 - Feb 14 with 2697 views | Akinfenwa |
I would assune it was because Olsson had been booked. | | | |
| Clucas on 12:05 - Feb 14 with 2650 views | caerleon_jack |
Sometimes you talk sense, sometimes you talk bollocks.
This time it's the latter. No point saying anything else really. | |
| Insert something witty here |
| |
| Clucas on 12:09 - Feb 14 with 2643 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Of course Roberts should really have been on the bench to replace Olsson, which would have left Clucas in his best position. | | | |
| Clucas on 12:44 - Feb 14 with 2618 views | TheResurrection |
I don't have a clue who you are to make a past judgement but going by your posts on here I'll have to assume you talk permanent bollox.
Let's look at it a different way..... Olsson has been booked 16 times in the EPL. How many of those games do you think he was subbed in?
As guttting as it is to see one of our players go in the book, especially when they're a defender, rarely do they get hooked because of it.
But Carlos has already bloody said what happened and that is he wanted to have all the meat on the barbeque. It was nothing to do do with being cautious and wanting to protect our full back staying on the pitch.
Gee facking god, the level of intelligence on this site is frightening. | |
| |
| Clucas on 12:46 - Feb 14 with 2612 views | TheResurrection |
No it wouldn't FFS.......
Because then we would've had another full back on the pitch when Carlos wanted to be more adventurous.
He sacrificed a more traditional full back for an attacking player in that position.
Honest a facking god. | |
| |
| Clucas on 12:49 - Feb 14 with 2604 views | Whiterockin |
I've only seen Roberts on the right, is he any good on the left. | | | |
| Clucas on 13:02 - Feb 14 with 2592 views | jasper_T |
He played there in the Notts County game. | | | |
| Clucas on 23:49 - Feb 17 with 2469 views | Tummer_from_Texas |
Naughton can, and Roberts can take his place. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
